Skip to main content
. 1999 Feb;65(2):795–801. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.2.795-801.1999

TABLE 3.

Sequence similarities of the excised bacterial bands that appear in Fig. 1a

Band
Closest relative
No. % Simi-larity Species Accession no. Taxonomic description
1 96.5 Flavobacterium sp. U63936 Cytophagales
2 86.6 Flexibacter sancti M62795 Cytophagales
3 97.4 Unidentified bacterium LD28 Z99999 β-Proteobacteria
4 97.4 Flavobacterium sp. U63936 Cytophagales
5 98.8 Blastobacter sp. U20772 β-Proteobacteria
5 98.8 Unidentified bacterium AJ223452 β-Proteobacteria
6 100 Blastobacter sp. U20772 β-Proteobacteria
6 100 Unidentified bacterium AJ223452 β-Proteobacteria
7 96.8 Flavobacterium aquatile M62797 Cytophagales
8a 100 Sphingomonas adhaesiva X72720 β-Proteobacteria
8b 96.4 Hyphomicrobium vulgare X53182 α-Proteobacteria
9 96.4 Hyphomicrobium vulgare X53182 α-Proteobacteria
10 98.3 Unidentified bacterium U85190 Actinomycetes
11 97.1 Unidentified bacterium U85190 Actinomycetes
12 99.4 Mycobacterium sp. U46146 Actinomycetes
a

Sequences were aligned to the closest relatives from the EMBL database. The similarity was calculated with gaps and ambiguities not taken into account.