Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;10(1):coac021. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coac021

Table 2.

Summary table for the generalized linear model and marginal means describing the catch abundances of species within the deterrent-integrated trap

Species scientific name Species common name Treatment Estimate Lower confidence level Upper confidence level Standard error Z score P value
C. carpio common carp AmbientDeterrent 32.73224.1763 313 357 0.82410520.9132893 9.367 <.0001
A. nebulosus brown bullhead AmbientDeterrent 1.36363.2709 12 25 0.19429010.6154188 −5.272 <.0001
Aggregate of species below AmbientDeterrent 6.24122.6514 62 51 0.36752150.693775 3.232 0.0012
C. auratus goldfish AmbientDeterrent 1.67750.7096 10 22 0.19977880.3258645 1.871 0.0614
C. carpio x C. auratus common carp x goldfish hybrid AmbientDeterrent 2.21181.4162 21 33 0.2237820.4862134 1.285 0.1989
Ictalurus punctatus channel catfish AmbientDeterrent 1.76760 10 2Inf 0.18982370.0000088 0.002 0.9982
Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad AmbientDeterrent 0.12970 00 0Inf 0.05368490.0000077 0.002 0.9981
Aplodinotus grunniens freshwater drum AmbientDeterrent 0.07810 00 0Inf 0.04066110.0000089 0.002 0.9985
Amia calva bowfin AmbientDeterrent 0.03980 00 0Inf 0.02877760.0000086 0.002 0.9984
Micropterus salmoides largemouth bass AmbientDeterrent 0.02520 00 0Inf 0.02681440.0000049 0.002 0.998
Lepomis gibbosus pumpkinseed AmbientDeterrent 00.0711 00 Inf46 0.00000060.2051705 −0.006 0.995
Oncorhyncus mykiss rainbow trout AmbientDeterrent 0.02010 00 0Inf 0.02035040.0000083 0.002 0.9985

The marginal means were estimated from the general linear model reported in the results using the R package ‘emmeans’. The predicted catch abundances of each species were allowed to independently vary across time within the general linear model, so the marginal means presented here were predicted for the median date of the study, 13 June 2019. The catch abundance of each species in each trial was also standardized across trap exposure time; therefore, the catch abundances were predicted for the median trap exposure time of 12.6 hours. Catch rates between each treatment were compared for each species in a pairwise post hoc Tukey–Kramer test. An estimated marginal mean was also predicted for the aggregation of all low abundance species (per species)