Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;18:1013–1026. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S360967

Table 3.

Ongoing Trials of TNK in Ischemic Strokes

Abbreviation Study Name Study ID Time Window Target Imaging Mismatch Intervention Sample Size Study Design Study Time Primary Endpoints
TWIST Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial NCT03181360 4.5h from awakening 0.25mg/kg TNK vs best standard treatment 600 PROBE 2017–2022 90d mRS score
NOR-TEST 2 The Norwegian
Tenecteplase Stroke Trial 2
NCT03854500 4.5h from onset/awakening 0.4mg/kg TNK vs 0.9mg/kg alteplase 1342 PROBE, non-inferiority 2019–2024 90d mRS 0–1
ROSE-TNK MRI-guided thrOmbolysis for Stroke bEyond Time Window by TNK NCT04752631 4.5–24h DWI-FLAIR mismatch 0.25mg/kg TNK vs best standard treatment 80 PROBE 2021–2022 90d mRS 0–1
TIMELESS Tenecteplase in Stroke Patients Between 4.5 and 24 Hours NCT03785678 4.5–24h CT/MR perfusion mismatch (ischemic core volume <70 mL, mismatch ratio is ≥1.8 and mismatch volume is ≥ 15 mL) 0.25mg/kg TNK vs placebo 456 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 2019–2022 90d mRS score
TRACE III Teneteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-III NCT05141305 4.5–24h CT perfusion or MRI_perfusion weighted imaging mismatch (ischemic core volume <70 mL, mismatch ratio≥1.8 and mismatch volume≥15 mL) 0.25mg/kg TNK vs best standard treatment 516 PROBE 2022–2023 90d mRS 0–1
CHinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke -Tenecteplase II NCT04516993 4.5–24h Perfusion lesion volume (DT > 3 s) to infarct core volume ratio (rCBF<30% or diffusion-weighted imaging lesion) >1.2, absolute difference >10 mL, and ischemic core volume <70mL 0.25mg/kg TNK vs nonthrombolysis drug 224 PROBE 2021–2022 90d mRS change
TEMPO-2 A Randomized Controlled Trial of TNK-tPA Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion NCT02398656 12h 0.25mg/kg TNK vs best standard treatment 1274 PROBE 2015–2023 90d mRS score
CHABLIS-T CHinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke -Tenecteplase NCT04086147 4.5–24h Perfusion lesion volume (DT > 3 s) to infarct core volume ratio (rCBF<30% or diffusion-weighted imaging lesion) >1.2, absolute difference >10 mL, and ischemic core volume <70mL 0.25mg/kg TNK vs 0.32mg/kg TNK 86 PROBE 2019–2021 Patients without endovascular therapy obtained >50% reperfusion at 4–6 hours; Patients with endovascular therapy: mTICI score 2b or better at initial angiogram; No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24–36 hours
ETERNAL-LVO Extending the Time Window for Tenecteplase by Effective Reperfusion in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion NCT04454788 24h CT/MR perfusion mismatch (ischemic core of <70mL, penumbra of >20mL and an ischemic core to perfusion lesion ratio of >1.8) 0.25mg/kg TNK vs best standard treatment 740 PROBE 2020–2025 90d mRS 0–1 or return to baseline mRS
TASTEa Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation Trial in the Ambulance NCT04071613 4.5h 0.25mg/kg TNK vs 0.9mg/kg alteplase 80 PROBE 2019–2021 The volume of the perfusion lesion on CTP performed on arrival at the receiving hospital
ATTEST2 Alteplase-Tenecteplase Trial Evaluation for Stroke Thrombolysis NCT02814409 4.5–24h 0.9mg/kg alteplase vs 0.25mg/kg TNK 1870 Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled 2016–2019 90d mRS score

Abbreviations: TNK, tenecteplase; PROBE, prospective, randomised open-label blinded endpoint; DT, delay time; rCBF, relative cerebral flow; mTICI, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.