Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;10:878703. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.878703

Table 7.

The assessment of health education and health promotion activities (n = 122).

Variable n Assessment of health education and health promotion (%) Have you ever been informed about cancer prevention at a primary care clinic in the commune? (%)
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very good p No Yes p
Total 122 41 21.3 19.7 3.3 64.8 20.5
Age <25 9 33.3 11.1 22.2 11.1 0.882a 44.4 33.3 0.6297b
25–44 39 43.6 25.6 15.4 0 74.4 17.9
45–64 50 42 20 26 4 r = 0.015 60 22
65 or older 24 37.5 20.8 12.5 4.2 66.7 16.7
Gender F 88 43.2 15.9 22.7 3.4 0.8145b 59.1 25 0.0329d
M 34 35.3 35.3 11.8 2.9 79.4 8.8
Education Primary 21 23.8 19 28.6 9.5 57.1 14.3 0.232b
Lower secondary 2 50 0 50 0 0.202a 0 50
Vocational 32 40.6 31.3 6.3 3.1 r = −0.13 75 9.4
Secondary 43 48.8 11.6 25.6 2.3 67.4 23.3
Higher 24 41.7 29.2 16.7 0 58.3 33.3
Professional status Employed 67 35.8 29.9 17.9 1.5 0.6357c 65.7 19.4 0.3574e
Retired 46 47.8 10.9 19.6 4.3 31 67.4 21.7
Unemployed 4 50 125 25 0 75 0
Students 5 40 0 40 20 20 40
Occupation Farmers 65 50.8 20 13.8 1.5 0.1056c 73.8 10.8 <0.0001e
Other manual workers 20 30 25 5 10 80 5
Office workers or other specialists 13 38.5 15.4 38.5 0 53.8 38.5
Health professionals 8 12.5 25 50 0 12.5 87.5
Teachers / educators 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 0 42.9 42.9
Unemployed 9 44.4 11.1 33.3 11.1 44.4 22.2
Economic status Bad 5 0 40 20 0 40 40 0.7379b
Average 40 37.5 20 20 5 0.2588a 65 12.5
Good 71 45.1 21.1 19.7 2.8 r = −0.11 66.2 22.5
Very good 6 50 16.7 16.7 0 66.7 33.3
Attitude to screening Does not attend 60 41.7 25 13.3 3.3 0.2069b 73.3 11.7 0.0043d
Attends 53 37.7 17 28.3 3.8 52.8 34
Family history of cancer No 45 40.5 26.2 21.4 0 0.7456b 61.9 21.4 0.8645d
Yes 66 41.2 20.6 19.1 4.4 64.7 20.6

n, group size;

a

Spearman's rank correlation coefficient;

b

Chi-squared test for trend;

c

Kruskal-Wallis;

d

Pearson's chi-squared test;

e

Fisher's exact test.