Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 23;142(6):1009–1030. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03767-6

Table 5.

Results of the systematic review for double plating of periprosthetic fractures

Title Authors Journal Year Level of evidence Number of cases Treatment Mean follow-up (months) Fracture healing Complications Functional outcome at final follow-up
Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with orthogonal double plating for periprosthetic femoral fractures Müller et al. International Orthopaedics 2014 IV

n = 10

n = 5 fractures around a total hip prosthesis

n = 1 fracture around a total knee prosthesis

n = 1 interprosthetic fracture

n = 3 implant failure after the stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures around a total hip prosthesis n = 1 or total knee prosthesis n = 2

mean age: 79.5 years

range 55–91 years

Double plating

lateral plating: 13–20 holes: LISS, LCP, NCB

Anterior plating: 8–14 holes: LCP

22.6

SD [6–42]

2 patients lost due to dead not related to surgery

7 of 8 fractures healed

within follow-up

n = 1

1 implant failure

7 patients presented with radiologically confirmed bony consolidation with the repaired extremity bearing their full weight

All patients were subjectively satisfied with their clinical outcome

Therefore, 7 out 10 patients showed excellent results according to Beals and Tower

A double-plating approach to distal femur fracture: A clinical study Steinberg et al. Injury 2017 IV

n = 32

n = 8 periprosthetic fractures

n = 24 femoral fractures including 2 non-unions and 1 open fracture

mean age: 76 years

range of age: 44–101 years

Lateral locking plate and medial plate

12

SD [8–20]

30 of 32 fractures healed

within 12 weeks (range 6–21 weeks)

n = 5

1 delayed union

1 a shaft fracture

2 superficial wound infections

1 deep infection after union

All fractures, excluding 1 that needed bone grafting and 1 refracture, healed radiographically within a mean of 12 weeks (range 6–21 weeks) and clinically within 11 weeks (range 6–17 weeks)

Axial alignment was good in all cases, but 1 fracture had a valgus of 8°. Range of motion were for extension 0°-20° and for flexion 85°–120°

An alternative treatment for osteoporotic Su Type III periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: Double locking plate fixation Çiçek et al. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2018 IV

n = 22 distal femur periprosthetic

fractures following total knee arthroplasty

Su Type 3

mean age: 73 years

range of age: 68–82 years

Medial and lateral locking plate (LCP)

n = 18 spongious autograft

69

SD[53–85]

20 of 22 fractures healed within 18.5 weeks (range 14.2–22.8 weeks)

n = 3

1 non-union

1 loss of reduction

1 superficial infection

Union was observed in 20 patients

KSS was 81.8 ± 7.8 (range 56–90)

WOMAC score was 78.1 ± 5.3 (range 62–88)

ROM was 98.1° ± 8.2° (range 70°–110°)

Mean time to pain-free weight bearing was 4.9 ± 1.1 (range 4–8) months

Dual plate fixation results in improved union rates in comminuted distal femur fractures compared to single plate fixation Bologna et al. Journal of Orthopaedics 2019 IV

n = 21 distal femoral fractures

n = 13 treated with lateral distal femoral locking plate (single plate)

n = 8 treated with precontoured distal femoral locking plate lateral and straight locking plate anteromedial (double plating)

Mean age: 61 years

Range of age: n.a

Standard lateral approach

Lateral distal femoral locking compression plate (single plate)

Extensile parapatellar approach (double plating)

Precontoured distal femoral locking plate was placed along the lateral distal femur, a straight locking plate was placed to the anteromedial surface of the distal femur

12

[6–29]

Single plate: 4 of 13 healed

Dual plate: 8 of 8 healed

Single plate: n = 10

6 non-unions

3 delayed unions

1 infection

Dual plate: n = 4

2 significant knee stiffness

2 mild anterolateral heterotopic ossifications

Single plate: knee range of motion 100° (92.5–115º)

Dual plate: knee range of motion 90° (70.0–90.0°)

Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures Park et al. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2020 IV

n = 21 distal femur periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty

Su Type 3

Mean age: 76 years

range of age: 56–90 years

Lateral: LCP

Medial: LCP and Philos to the distal femur

12 20 of 21 fractures healed within 14 weeks (range 10–21 weeks)

n = 8

1 non-union

3 superficial infection

4 soft tissue healing

Of the 21 fractures, 20 (95%) healed primarily within 14 weeks (range 10–21 weeks). All cases achieved satisfactory limb alignment, with an m-LDFA of 89.6º (range 85–92°) and m-PDFA of 86.5º (range 70–130°) on average

Average ROM: 114° (range 70–130°)

The mean Knee Society knee and function scores were 94 (range 83–100) and 89.5 (range 76–99), respectively