Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Macro Lett. 2022 Mar 2;11(3):394–401. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00056

Internal and External Catalysis in Boronic Ester Networks

Boyeong Kang 1, Julia A Kalow 1,*
PMCID: PMC9110869  NIHMSID: NIHMS1791672  PMID: 35575361

Abstract

In dynamic materials, the reversible condensation between boronic acids and diols provides adaptability, self-healing ability, and responsiveness to small molecules and pH. The thermodynamics and kinetics of bond exchange determine the mechanical properties of dynamic polymer networks. Here, we investigate the effects of diol structure and salt additives on the rate of boronic acid–diol bond exchange, binding affinity, and the mechanical properties of the corresponding polymer networks. We find that proximal amides used to conjugate diols to polymers and buffering anions induce significant rate acceleration consistent with internal and external catalysis, respectively. This rate acceleration is reflected in the stress relaxation of the gels. These findings contribute to the fundamental understanding of the boronic ester dynamic bond and offer molecular strategies to tune the macromolecular properties of dynamic materials.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1791672-f0005.jpg


The reversible condensation between boronic acids and diols has been applied to sensors,16 drug delivery,3, 69 and dynamic hydrogels3, 6, 8, 10 due to its biocompatibility, selectivity, and reactivity under ambient-temperature aqueous conditions. Among dynamic covalent chemistries1113, boronic acid–diol exchange offers the fastest uncatalyzed rates, enabling rapid responses to physical and chemical stimuli.1, 14, 15 Within polymer networks, boronic esters endow self-healing behavior, stimuli responsiveness, and viscoelasticity. Experiment, simulations, and theory have revealed that the macroscopic properties of dynamic networks are highly dependent on the thermodynamics and kinetics of the reversible crosslink.1627 Specifically, the equilibrium constant (Keq) of the dynamic reaction determines crosslink density in networks, and thus the stiffness of the polymer network (frequency-independent plateau modulus, Gp) (Figure 1a). On the other hand, important dynamic behaviors such as self-healing and viscoelasticity are governed by the kinetics of the reversible reaction. In dynamic networks that undergo exchange through dissociative mechanisms, the rate of dissociation (kr) is thought to determine the viscoelasticity of the network, which is characterized by the crossover frequency (ωc) at which material transition occurs from solid-like to liquid-like behavior (Figure 1a). Therefore, to better control and design boronic ester-based materials for specific applications, it is essential to understand the molecular factors that influence both kinetics and thermodynamics of this dynamic bond.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Translation of molecular parameters into macroscopic network properties. Solid lines and dashed lines represent storage modulus (G’) and loss modulus (G”) of each material with distinct molecular parameter, respectively. The binding constant (Keq) relates to the stiffness (plateau modulus, Gp) while the rate of dissociation (kr) determines the viscoelasticity in dissociative networks. (b) Summary of factors affecting the boronic acid–diol reversible condensation and focus of this study (in bold). (c) This work uncovers internal catalysis in boronic ester networks by the linker used for diol conjugation, and external catalysis by buffering anions.

The dynamic reaction between boronic acids and diols occurs via multi-step mechanisms and are sensitive to many factors: pKa of the boronic acid and diol, sterics and dihedral angle of the diol, pH of the solution, and buffer composition and concentration (Figure 1b).10, 28, 29 As a result, the reaction landscape varies significantly depending on the choice of boronic acid, diol partner, and reaction conditions. Efforts to understand how these factors affect the thermodynamics of the dynamic bond have focused on maximizing the binding affinity (Keq) at physiological pH.10, 28, 3034 Those studies have introduced new classes of boronic acids with high binding affinities, such as Wulff-type boronic acids and benzoxaboroles, and identified diols and polyols with high hydrolytic stability (e.g. nopoldiol and salicylhydroxamic acid).3540 In contrast, design principles to tune the kinetics of the reaction have not been systematically developed (see Supporting Information (SI), Table S1 for a summary of kinetic studies).4149 Furthermore, factors of particular relevance to polymer networks, such as the conjugation chemistry used to attach the dynamic bond to polymers or commonly used buffers for hydrogels, are not typically included in small-molecule model studies.

Here, we report the effect of diol structure and salt additives on both kinetics and thermodynamics of the reversible boronic acid–diol condensation and their impact on the mechanical properties of boronic ester networks. We measured the exchange kinetics and binding affinity between different diols/polyols and phenylboronic acid (PBA) by one-dimensional selective exchange spectroscopy (1D EXSY) and 1H NMR. We then synthesized star polymers with analogous diol/polyol and boronic acid end groups and measured the mechanical properties of the resulting gels using shear rheology. Through these measurements, we uncovered two new factors that affect the mechanics of boronic ester networks: the presence of amide groups proximal to the diol, and the composition of the buffer (Figure 1c). We showed that amide groups used to conjugate diols to polymers act as internal catalysts via a solvent-insertion mechanism,50 accelerating both esterification and hydrolysis. Additionally, we observed salt-dependent rate constants correlated to the pKa of the anion’s conjugate acid. These changes in molecular thermodynamics and kinetics are translated into gels with a wide range of mechanical properties, with shear moduli ranging from 1.8 kPa to 27 kPa and relaxation times from 0.1 s to 571 s, based only on changes in diol structure or salt additive. Our results inform new design parameters that can be used to tune boronic ester-based dynamic materials and complement existing studies that have focused on the boronic acid partner. Furthermore, these findings emphasize the importance of designing small-molecule model systems that capture essential components of the polymer network when relating molecular parameters to network properties.

To study the effect of diol structure on boronic ester formation and hydrolysis, we selected a representative 1,2-diol, 1,3-diol, triol, and polyol with varying degrees of flexibility and steric encumbrance (Figure 2a, “simplified alcohols”). The reaction kinetics of the reversible condensation between PBA and each alcohol were studied by using 1D EXSY. EXSY NMR detects magnetization transfer via chemical exchange, allowing quantitative measurement of the rate of dynamic processes occurring slower than the NMR time scale. In 1D EXSY, a peak of interest is selectively excited, and the intensities of the irradiated and exchanged peaks are monitored as a function of mixing time.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) The reversible condensation between PBA and alcohols, and the structures of the alcohols used in this study. (b) Representative 1H NMR (top, at equilibrium) and 1D EXSY with different mixing times (bottom) with PBA and NP at 25 °C. The peak at 7.97 ppm (ortho-proton of PBA) is selectively irradiated. (c) Analysis of 1D EXSY data. The concentration change of PBA over mixing time was fit with a first-order reversible rate law. (d) Arrhenius plot for pseudo-first-order rate constants at different temperatures; activation energies were calculated from the slope.

The dynamic reaction was studied under pseudo-first order conditions (see SI for details). Under these conditions, the ortho-protons of the boronic acid and ester can be selectively irradiated in the 1D EXSY experiment (Figure 2b). The decrease in acid concentration following irradiation with respect to mixing time was fit to a first-order reversible rate law to obtain pseudo-first-order rate constants for the forward (esterification, kobs,f) and reverse (hydrolysis, kobs,r) reactions (Figure 2c).51 These measurements were repeated at several temperatures to determine the activation energies for esterification and hydrolysis (Figure 2d).

The measured kinetic parameters and equilibrium constants for each alcohol are summarized in Table 1; activation energies (Ea,f for esterification and Ea,r for hydrolysis) are reported in Table S3. Consistent with previous work,29 the flexible 1,3-diol neopentylglycol (NP) exhibited a significantly lower binding affinity to PBA compared to cis-1,2-cyclopentanediol (CP), which has a locked geometry that favors ester formation but slows kinetics dramatically. Increasing the number of OH groups also enhanced the binding affinity (NP < Tris < Sorb). As the functionality increases, the rate of esterification increases, and the rate of hydrolysis decreases, albeit to a lesser extent.

Table 1.

Equilibrium and rate constants for the reversible esterification/hydrolysis of PBA with various alcohols.

Alcohols K eq kobs,f (s−1) kobs,r (s−1) k rel,f c krel,rc°
NP 0.577 (±0.009) 0.0473 (±0.0004) 0.082 (±0.001)
Tris 1.389 (±0.006) 0.1100 (±0.0003) 0.0792 (±0.0003)
Sorb 7.4 (±0.6) 0.23 (±0.01) 0.031 (±0.002)
CP 15a (±2) 0.0216 (±0.0004) 0.0014b (±0.0002)
Tris-amide 0.182 (±0.006) 2.20 (±0.04) 12.1 (±0.3) 20 150
NP-amide 0.877 (±0.005) 0.327 (±0.001) 0.373 (±0.002) 6.9 4.5
(syn)-CP-amide 1.45 (±0.02) 0.210 (±0.002) 0.145 (±0.002) 9.7 100
(anti)-CP-amide 5.4 (±0.4) 0.107 (±0.006) 0.020 (±0.001) 5.0 14
Glu-amide 6.4 (±0.5) 0.70 (±0.03) 0.110 (±0.008) 3.0 3.5
a

Estimated using Keq = ([ester][H2O]2)/([acid][diol]) because hydrolysis was too slow for the rate constant to be extracted by fitting; see SI for details.

b

Estimated from Keq using kobs,r = kobs,f/Keq.

c

Calculated by kobs (amide derivatives)/kobs (simplified alcohols).

We next synthesized star polymers with end groups that contain the structures of the simplified alcohols (Figure 3a; see SI for synthetic details). A mixture of anti and syn diastereomers was used to prepare PEG-CP; as a result, its end groups represent a 4:1 ratio of anti and syn diastereomers in all cases unless otherwise noted (see SI for assignment). Each alcohol-terminated polymer was mixed with PEG-PBA in a 1:1 ratio to form a 10 w/v% solution in propylene carbonate containing 1% (v/v) D2O. This solvent mixture was required based on the low binding constants of some of the alcohols tested, which preclude gelation in fully aqueous environments. The gels were characterized by oscillatory shear rheology within the linear viscoelastic regime to determine the frequency-independent plateau modulus (Gp) (Figure 3b; see SI for amplitude sweeps).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mechanical and self-healing properties of the gels formed from 4-arm PEG-PBA and PEG-alcohol (1:1, 10 w/v% in propylene carbonate with 1% D2O). (a) Chemical structures of modified PEG polymers. PEG-CP end groups represent a mixture of diastereomers (4:1 anti:syn; see SI for assignment). (b) Frequency sweeps at 5% strain obtained by oscillatory shear rheology. (c) Normalized stress relaxation profiles following 5% shear step strain. (d) Calculated τ for the different gels (bar graph, left axis) and their plateau moduli, Gp (black dot, right axis). Mechanical data are the average of 3 samples; error is the standard deviation of the mean. (e) Photographs of PEG-Tris, PEG-Glu and PEG-CP gels undergoing self-healing.

In a dynamic network, the number of elastically active polymer strands, which determines Gp, is dictated by Keq of the crosslink. Tibbitt recently modified the phantom network model to directly relate Gp to Keq in dynamic networks and demonstrated the validity of this model in a boronic ester hydrogel.21 Based on the Keq values obtained for the simplified alcohol in Table 1, we expected the relative plateau moduli of the corresponding gels to follow the trend PEG-NP < PEG-Tris < PEG-Glu < PEG-CP. However, we observed that the moduli followed the trend PEG-Tris << PEG-NP < PEG-CP < PEG-Glu (Figure 3d).

To relate the kinetics of the dynamic bond and the viscoelasticity of the gels, we applied a step strain (5%) to the gels and measured the stress relaxation over time (Figure 3c). These data were fit to a Maxwell model to obtain the characteristic relaxation time τ, the time required for the material to relax stress to 1/e of its initial value. The theoretical foundation established by Semenov and Rubinstein revealed an inverse relationship between τ and the dissociation rate of the crosslink (τ ∝ 1/ kobs,r),23, 24 and experimental studies have confirmed this relationship.1721, 26, 5254 Based on the measured kobs,r values of the simplified alcohols, we expected to observe the trend PEG-NP ~ PEG-Tris < PEG-Glu << PEG-CP. However, the trend in relaxation times was PEG-Tris < PEG-Glu < PEG-NP << PEG-CP (Figure 3d).

Analogously, the rate of self-healing ability in the network should be determined by the rate of crosslink formation (kobs,f).26, 27, 55 We qualitatively compared self-healing of PEG-Tris, PEG-Glu and PEG-CP gels by cutting and re-forming the gels, and observed the fastest self-healing in PEG-Tris (Figure 3e). Based on the measured kobs,f trend, we expect self-healing to occur fastest for PEG-Glu. Taken together, the discrepancies between the small-molecule parameters and the mechanical properties of the networks led us to re-evaluate the use of simplified alcohols as model compounds.

The key structural difference between the simplified alcohols in Figure 2a and the crosslinkers in the gel is the presence of amide groups used for conjugation. Previously, our lab has taken advantage of photoswitchable Lewis basic groups proximal to the boronic ester to modulate the kinetics and thermodynamics of its dynamic covalent reactions.5658 Anslyn has shown that the basic aminomethyl group in Wulff-type boronic acids catalyzes the addition and elimination of alcohols and water.42, 59 However, analogous internal catalytic effects for the diol component of this dynamic covalent reaction are far less studied. Hall showed that the proximity of an ether linkage to nopoldiol had a 1.4–1.8-fold effect on esterification rate,36 but the effect on hydrolysis rate was not quantified. We hypothesized that the amide groups introduced for polymer functionalization perturb the rate and equilibrium constants of the esterification and hydrolysis reactions, through inductive effects, direct coordination to the boron center,60, 61 or internal catalysis.62, 63

Therefore, we synthesized amide derivatives of each alcohol (Figure 1a, “amide derivatives”) and measured the kinetics of their dynamic reactions with PBA using 1D EXSY (Table 1). Indeed, we observed dramatic increases in both esterification and hydrolysis rates for the amide derivatives compared to their simplified alcohol counterparts. These increases ranged from a factor of 3 (Sorb vs. Glu-amide) to greater than an order of magnitude (Tris vs. Tris-amide, 20-fold increase in kobs,f and 150-fold increase in kobs,r). With Glu-amide, we observed an additional peak that undergoes exchange with both acid and ester (Figure S18). We propose this peak is an intermediate species as multiple binding modes can exist with ring-opened gluconolactone.18

To obtain insight into the relative contributions of inductive and neighboring-group effects, we prepared the anti and syn diastereomers of CP-amide and separately measured their reaction kinetics with PBA. Relative to unfunctionalized CP, the minor isomer of CP-amide (syn) experiences more significant rate acceleration (9.7-fold for esterification and 100-fold for hydrolysis) than the major isomer (anti, 5.0-fold and 14-fold, respectively) (Table 1). We propose that (syn)-CP-amide experiences greater rate acceleration than the anti diastereomer because the amide carbonyl is on the same face of the cyclopentane ring as the diol and is thus well positioned to activate incoming nucleophiles (Figure S19). Furthermore, using 11B NMR, we obtained evidence that the boronic ester of NP-amide forms a solvent-inserted tetrahedral species in methanol-d4, which is not observed with NP (Figure S20).50, 64 These results suggest that internal catalysis occurs via a solvent-assisted mechanism, wherein the amide carbonyl facilitates proton transfer when water or alcohol attacks the boron center.

The amide derivatives exhibited more pronounced rate acceleration for hydrolysis than for esterification, except for NP-amide. As a result, the binding constants for Tris-amide, CP-amide, and Glu-amide with PBA are lower than those of their simplified alcohol counterparts. Therefore, when the amide effect is considered, the trend in binding affinities for the amide model systems (Tris-amide < NP-amide < CP-amide < Glu-amide) is consistent with the trend in plateau modulus observed for the gels. Furthermore, the self-healing trends for the networks are qualitatively consistent with the kobs,f trends for the amide derivatives, with Tris-amide and PEG-Tris displaying the highest kobs,f and self-healing rate, respectively.

The kobs,r values predict a trend in bulk relaxation times (Tris-amide < NP-amide < Glu-amide < (anti)-CP-amide) that more closely resembles the gel data. The ratio of anti:syn isomers in PEG-CP affects the relaxation time, with a greater fraction of syn isomer (anti:syn = 1.5:1 vs. 4:1) corresponding to faster stress relaxation (τ = 355 vs. 571 s), again providing evidence for the relevance of internal catalysis in the mechanism by which the network relaxes stress (Figure S38). While the measured rate constant for Glu-amide hydrolysis is ~3-fold slower than NP-amide hydrolysis based on our EXSY experiments, PEG-Glu relaxes stress ~2-fold faster than PEG-NP. However, this discrepancy is ascribed in part to the buildup of an intermediate in the dynamic reaction of Glu-amide, which may affect the rate constants measured by EXSY.

Overall, our data agree with the paradigm first articulated by Craig for dynamic networks: “strong means slow”, meaning that the gels that resist flow have slower kinetics for the crosslink-breaking step.53 Previous studies of supramolecular networks have shown that the frequency sweeps for chemically distinct networks can be superimposed when scaled to a molecular parameter such as kr or Ea,r (“time-crosslinker superposition”).17, 65 However, those systems undergo flow through single-step, dissociative mechanisms. For our boronic ester networks, it was not possible to superimpose the frequency sweep data by scaling to 1/kobs,r (Figure S37). We ascribe these differences to the complexity of boronic ester hydrolysis, a multi-step mechanism in which the dominant pathway and speciation can change depending on the structure of the boronic acid and diol, and environmental factors like solvent and pH.41, 48, 66 Consistent with changes in mechanism or rate-limiting step, the small-molecule activation energies are not consistently lowered by the presence of an internal catalyst (e.g. Ea,r is 20 kJ/mol for Tris and 36 kJ/mol for Tris-amide; see Table S3).

Many boronic ester-based hydrogels are designed for biomedical applications, so are typically formed and studied in the presence of buffers or media containing inorganic salts, amino acids, glucose, and vitamins. While previous studies have focused on the pH of the medium rather than the buffer itself, Springsteen and Wang showed that the binding affinity of a catechol dye to PBA is sensitive to buffer composition and concentration.30, 67 Furthermore, London and Gabel showed that the presence of phosphate anion increased the dissociation rate of 4-fluorophenylboronic esters.68 In the course of our studies, we also observed significant changes in viscoelasticity of gels based on the identity and concentration of buffer salts. Therefore, we used 1D EXSY to systematically determine the effect of ions on the rate of boronic ester exchange. NP was used as the model diol for this study, and various salts were introduced to the solution. To rule out any changes in rate due to pH, the pH of each solution was adjusted to 7 using either DCl or NaOD.

The pseudo-first-order rate constants for esterification and hydrolysis in the presence of various salts are shown in Table 2. Using a common buffer, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), we observed two orders of magnitude increase of the rate constants for both the forward and reverse reactions. The effect of phosphate anion was further confirmed with NBu4H2PO4, which revealed similar rate acceleration. London and Gabel proposed that phosphate anions catalyze proton transfer from water during hydrolysis.68 We further observed that the extent of acceleration was correlated with the pKa of the conjugate acid: KOAc provides ~7-fold acceleration, compared to D2O alone, and NBu4PF6 shows no effect (see Table S4 for additional salts). Keq was not affected by salt in acetone (Table 2), but a two-fold change was observed in propylene carbonate (Figure S43).

Table 2.

Rate constants for the reversible esterification/hydrolysis of PBA with NP in the presence of different salts at pH 7.

Salt pKaa kobs,f (s−1) kobs,r (s−1)
No salt - 0.0473 (±0.0004) 0.082 (±0.001)
PBS (NaH2PO4 + Na2HPO4) H2PO4 = 7.21 5.59 (±0.07) 8.2 (±0.1)
NBU4H2PO4 4.90 (±0.06) 7.9 (±0.1)
KOAc CH3COOH = 4.76 0.371 (±0.002) 0.574 (±0.005)
NBU4PF6 - 0.0587 (±0.0006) 0.095 (±0.001)
a

From pKa data compiled by R. Williams.69

We anticipated that the dramatic effects on hydrolysis rate would also translate to the viscoelasticity of boronic ester gels. Indeed, compared to the PEG-NP gel without salts, relaxation times are 10 and 1000 times faster in the presence of 0.01 M KOAc and 0.01 M NBu4H2PO4, respectively (Figure 4a). This 1000-fold range in relaxation times is visually apparent and is achieved solely through the addition of salts, without any change in pH (Figure 4b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects of anion coordination on the mechanical properties of the PEG-NP gels (10 w/v% in propylene carbonate with 1% 1M salt in D2O) formed with solution containing different salts (final concentration of salt: 0.01M). pH of the 1M stock solution of the salt in D2O was adjusted to 7 with either DCl or NaOD. (a) Frequency sweep with 5% strain. (b) Photographs of PEG-NP gels at pH 7 in the absence and the presence of 0.01M NBu4H2PO4 salts.

Small-molecule model studies, including our own,58 are often performed with simple diols like ethylene glycol or fructose in organic solvents such as DMSO, which simplifies analysis. In comparison, the attachment of diols to polymers requires the installation of Lewis basic functional groups like amides, triazoles,70 and oximes.71 Furthermore, the resulting materials are often studied in complex aqueous environments like buffer or media. Our findings suggest that small-molecule model studies based on simple diols in organic solvents do not sufficiently capture the behavior of materials, particularly in the translation from molecular kinetics to dynamic mechanical properties.

By comparing the small-molecule kinetics of dynamic covalent reactions to the macroscopic properties of covalent adaptable networks, we have discovered two factors that affect gel mechanics by accelerating boronic acid esterification and hydrolysis: proximal amides commonly used to conjugate crosslinkers to polymers, and anions found in buffers and media. The extent of this rate acceleration can be precisely tuned through the position of the amide relative to the diol and the pKa of the anion’s conjugate acid, and therefore can be viewed as tunable design parameters for dynamic materials. The internal catalysis effect may extend to other Lewis basic groups used for polymer modification, with both distance and three-dimensional structure influencing the magnitude of this effect36, 70, 71, or to other classes of boronic acids such as benzoxaboroles and Wulff-type boronic acids. These effects could be exploited in the design of dynamic materials that change physical properties in response to anions or diols. We envision this work will contribute to a growing understanding of the boronic ester dynamic bond and provide strategies to molecularly engineer dynamic materials.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The small-molecule studies in this work were supported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER award CHE-1847948, and the network studies were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01GM132677. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Science Foundation or National Institutes of Health. J.A.K. is supported by a Sloan Research Fellowship and a Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award. This work made use of NMR and MS instrumentation at the Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Center (IMSERC) at Northwestern, which has received support from the NSF (NSF CHE-9871268); Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205); the State of Illinois and International Institute for Nanotechnology. Rheological measurements were performed at the MatCI Facility, which receives support from the MRSEC Program (NSF DMR-1720139) of the Materials Research Center at Northwestern University.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Synthetic procedures, EXSY NMR spectra and fitting, rheology data, 11B, 1H, and 13C NMR spectra.

References

  • 1.Wu X; Li Z; Chen XX; Fossey JS; James TD; Jiang YB, Selective sensing of saccharides using simple boronic acids and their aggregates. Chem. Soc. Rev 2013, 42 (20), 8032–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bian Z; Liu A; Li Y; Fang G; Yao Q; Zhang G; Wu Z, Boronic acid sensors with double recognition sites: a review. Analyst 2020, 145 (3), 719–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brooks WL; Sumerlin BS, Synthesis and Applications of Boronic Acid-Containing Polymers: From Materials to Medicine. Chem. Rev 2016, 116 (3), 1375–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cambre JN; Sumerlin BS, Biomedical applications of boronic acid polymers. Polymer 2011, 52 (21), 4631–4643. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Galbraith E; James TD, Boron based anion receptors as sensors. Chem. Soc. Rev 2010, 39 (10), 3831–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guan Y; Zhang Y, Boronic acid-containing hydrogels: synthesis and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev 2013, 42 (20), 8106–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stubelius A; Lee S; Almutairi A, The Chemistry of Boronic Acids in Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery. Acc. Chem. Res 2019, 52 (11), 3108–3119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ryu JH; Lee GJ; Shih YV; Kim TI; Varghese S, Phenylboronic Acid-polymers for Biomedical Applications. Curr. Med. Chem 2019, 26 (37), 6797–6816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marco-Dufort B; Willi J; Vielba-Gomez F; Gatti F; Tibbitt MW, Environment Controls Biomolecule Release from Dynamic Covalent Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (1), 146–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marco-Dufort B; Tibbitt MW, Design of moldable hydrogels for biomedical applications using dynamic covalent boronic esters. Mater. Today Chem 2019, 12, 16–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang W; Jin Y, Dynamic Covalent Chemistry: Principles, Reactions, and Applications; WileyVCH, Print. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jin Y; Yu C; Denman RJ; Zhang W, Recent advances in dynamic covalent chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev 2013, 42 (16), 6634–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rowan SJ; Cantrill SJ; Cousins GRL; Sanders JKM; Stoddart JF, Dynamic Covalent Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2002, 41 (6), 898–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tang S; Richardson BM; Anseth KS, Dynamic covalent hydrogels as biomaterials to mimic the viscoelasticity of soft tissues. Prog. Mater. Sci 2021, 120, 100738. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Robinson LL; Self JL; Fusi AD; Bates MW; Read de Alaniz J; Hawker CJ; Bates CM; Sample CS, Chemical and Mechanical Tunability of 3D-Printed Dynamic Covalent Networks Based on Boronate Esters. ACS Macro Lett. 2021, 10 (7), 857–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kloxin CJ; Bowman CN, Covalent adaptable networks: smart, reconfigurable and responsive network systems. Chem. Soc. Rev 2013, 42 (17), 7161–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yount WC; Loveless DM; Craig SL, Small-molecule dynamics and mechanisms underlying the macroscopic mechanical properties of coordinatively cross-linked polymer networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127 (41), 14488–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Figueiredo T; Cosenza V; Ogawa Y; Jeacomine I; Vallet A; Ortega S; Michel R; Olsson JDM; Gerfaud T; Boiteau JG; Jing J; Harris C; Auzely-Velty R, Boronic acid and diol-containing polymers: how to choose the correct couple to form “strong” hydrogels at physiological pH. Soft Matter 2020, 16 (15), 3628–3641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang S; Olsen BD, Relaxation Processes in Supramolecular Metallogels Based on Histidine–Nickel Coordination Bonds. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (23), 9163–9175. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tan CSY; Agmon G; Liu J; Hoogland D; Janeček E-R; Appel EA; Scherman OA, Distinguishing relaxation dynamics in transiently crosslinked polymeric networks. Polym. Chem 2017, 8 (35), 5336–5343. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marco-Dufort B; Iten R; Tibbitt MW, Linking Molecular Behavior to Macroscopic Properties in Ideal Dynamic Covalent Networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142 (36), 15371–15385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parada GA; Zhao X, Ideal reversible polymer networks. Soft Matter 2018, 14 (25), 5186–5196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Semenov AN; Rubinstein M, Thermoreversible Gelation in Solutions of Associative Polymers. 1. Statics. Macromolecules 1998, 31 (4), 1373–1385. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rubinstein M; Semenov AN, Thermoreversible Gelation in Solutions of Associating Polymers. 2. Linear Dynamics. Macromolecules 1998, 31 (4), 1386–1397. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Van Herck N; Maes D; Unal K; Guerre M; Winne JM; Du Prez FE, Covalent Adaptable Networks with Tunable Exchange Rates Based on Reversible Thiol-yne Cross-Linking. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59 (9), 3609–3617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cromwell OR; Chung J; Guan Z, Malleable and Self-Healing Covalent Polymer Networks through Tunable Dynamic Boronic Ester Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137 (20), 6492–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.FitzSimons TM; Oentoro F; Shanbhag TV; Anslyn EV; Rosales AM, Preferential Control of Forward Reaction Kinetics in Hydrogels Crosslinked with Reversible Conjugate Additions. Macromolecules 2020, 53 (10), 3738–3746. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yan J; Springsteen G; Deeter S; Wang B, The relationship among pKa, pH, and binding constants in the interactions between boronic acids and diols—it is not as simple as it appears. Tetrahedron 2004, 60 (49), 11205–11209. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roy CD; Brown HC, Stability of boronic esters – Structural effects on the relative rates of transesterification of 2-(phenyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane. J. Organomet. Chem 2007, 692 (4), 784–790. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bosch LI; Fyles TM; James TD, Binary and ternary phenylboronic acid complexes with saccharides and Lewis bases. Tetrahedron 2004, 60 (49), 11175–11190. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peters JA, Interactions between boric acid derivatives and saccharides in aqueous media: Structures and stabilities of resulting esters. Coord. Chem. Rev 2014, 268, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brooks WLA; Deng CC; Sumerlin BS, Structure-Reactivity Relationships in Boronic AcidDiol Complexation. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (12), 17863–17870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cheng Y; Ni N; Yang W; Wang B, A new class of fluorescent boronic acids that have extraordinarily high affinities for diols in aqueous solution at physiological pH. Chem. Eur. J 2010, 16 (45), 13528–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martínez-Aguirre MA; Flores-Alamo M; Yatsimirsky AK, Thermodynamic and structural study of complexation of phenylboronic acid with salicylhydroxamic acid and related ligands. Appl. Organomet. Chem 2018, 32 (8). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Deng CC; Brooks WLA; Abboud KA; Sumerlin BS, Boronic Acid-Based Hydrogels Undergo Self-Healing at Neutral and Acidic pH. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4 (2), 220–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akgun B; Hall DG, Fast and Tight Boronate Formation for Click Bioorthogonal Conjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55 (12), 3909–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roberts MC; Hanson MC; Massey AP; Karren EA; Kiser PF, Dynamically Restructuring Hydrogel Networks Formed with Reversible Covalent Crosslinks. Adv. Mater 2007, 19 (18), 2503–2507. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wulff G, Selective binding to polymers via covalent bonds. The construction of chiral cavities as specific receptor sites. Pure Appl. Chem 1982, 54 (11), 2093–2102. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stolowitz ML; Ahlem C; Hughes KA; Kaiser RJ; Kesicki EA; Li G; Lund KP; Torkelson SM; Wiley JP, Phenylboronic acid-salicylhydroxamic acid bioconjugates. 1. A novel boronic acid complex for protein immobilization. Bioconjug. Chem 2001, 12 (2), 229–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dowlut M; Hall DG, An improved class of sugar-binding boronic acids, soluble and capable of complexing glycosides in neutral water. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128 (13), 4226–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Furikado Y; Nagahata T; Okamoto T; Sugaya T; Iwatsuki S; Inamo M; Takagi HD; Odani A; Ishihara K, Universal reaction mechanism of boronic acids with diols in aqueous solution: kinetics and the basic concept of a conditional formation constant. Chem. Eur. J 2014, 20 (41), 13194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Collins BE; Metola P; Anslyn EV, On the Rate of Boronate Ester Formation in ortho-Aminomethyl Functionalized Phenyl Boronic Acids. Supramol. Chem 2013, 25 (2), 79–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tomsho JW; Benkovic SJ, Elucidation of the mechanism of the reaction between phenylboronic acid and a model diol, Alizarin Red S. J. Org. Chem 2012, 77 (5), 2098–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pizer R; Tihal C, Equilibria and Reaction Mechanism of the Complexation of Methylboronic Acid with Polyols. Inorg. Chem 1992, (31), 3243–3247. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Monajemi H; Cheah MH; Lee VS; Zain SM; Tajuddin Wan Abdullah WA, On the kinetics and reaction mechanisms of boronic acid in interaction with diols for non-enzymatic glucose monitoring applications: a hybrid DFT study. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (21), 10505–10513. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pizer RD; Tihal CA, Mechanism of boron acid/polyol complex formation. Commnets on the Trigonal/tetrahedral interconversion on boron. Polyhedron 1996, 15 (19), 3411–3416. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ni N; Laughlin S; Wang Y; Feng Y; Zheng Y; Wang B, Probing the general time scale question of boronic acid binding with sugars in aqueous solution at physiological pH. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2012, 20 (9), 2957–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Suzuki Y; Kusuyama D; Sugaya T; Iwatsuki S; Inamo M; Takagi HD; Ishihara K, Reactivity of Boronic Acids toward Catechols in Aqueous Solution. J. Org. Chem 2020, 85 (8), 5255–5264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pizer R; Babcock L, Mechanism of the complexation of boron acids with catechol and substituted catechols. Inorg. Chem 1977, 16 (7), 1677–1681. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhu L; Shabbir SH; Gray M; Lynch VM; Sorey S; Anslyn EV, A structural investigation of the N-B interaction in an o-(N,N-dialkylaminomethyl)arylboronate system. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128 (4), 1222–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Swartjes A; White PB; Lammertink M; Elemans J; Nolte RJM, Host-Guest Exchange of Viologen Guests in Porphyrin Cage Compounds as Studied by Selective Exchange Spectroscopy (1D EXSY) NMR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60 (3), 1254–1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sheridan RJ; Bowman CN, A Simple Relationship Relating Linear Viscoelastic Properties and Chemical Structure in a Model Diels–Alder Polymer Network. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (18), 7634–7641. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yount WC; Loveless DM; Craig SL, Strong means slow: dynamic contributions to the bulk mechanical properties of supramolecular networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2005, 44 (18), 2746–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuang X; Liu G; Dong X; Wang D, Correlation between stress relaxation dynamics and thermochemistry for covalent adaptive networks polymers. Mater. Chem. Front 2017, 1 (1), 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McKinnon DD; Domaille DW; Cha JN; Anseth KS, Bis-Aliphatic Hydrazone-Linked Hydrogels Form Most Rapidly at Physiological pH: Identifying the Origin of Hydrogel Properties with Small Molecule Kinetic Studies. Chem. Mater 2014, 26 (7), 2382–2387. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Barsoum D; Kalow J, Remote-controlled exchange rates by photoswitchable internal catalysis of dynamic covalent bonds. ChemRxiv. 2021, DOI: 10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-lwk72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Accardo JV; Kalow JA, Reversibly tuning hydrogel stiffness through photocontrolled dynamic covalent crosslinks. Chem. Sci 2018, 9 (27), 5987–5993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Accardo JV; McClure ER; Mosquera MA; Kalow JA, Using Visible Light to Tune Boronic Acid-Ester Equilibria. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142 (47), 19969–19979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sun X; Chapin BM; Metola P; Collins B; Wang B; James TD; Anslyn EV, The mechanisms of boronate ester formation and fluorescent turn-on in ortho-aminomethylphenylboronic acids. Nat. Chem 2019, 11 (9), 768–778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yoshino J; Kano N; Kawashima T, Synthesis of organoboron compounds bearing an azo group and substituent effects on their structures and photoisomerization. Tetrahedron 2008, 64 (33), 7774–7781. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kano N; Yoshino J; Kawashima T, Photoswitching of the Lewis acidity of a catecholborane bearing an azo group based on the change in coordination number of boron. Org. Lett 2005, 7 (18), 3909–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen H; Ye H; Hai Y; Zhang L; You L, n --> pi* interactions as a versatile tool for controlling dynamic imine chemistry in both organic and aqueous media. Chem. Sci 2020, 11 (10), 2707–2715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Delahaye M; Winne JM; Du Prez FE, Internal Catalysis in Covalent Adaptable Networks: Phthalate Monoester Transesterification As a Versatile Dynamic Cross-Linking Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (38), 15277–15287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Collins BE; Sorey S; Hargrove AE; Shabbir SH; Lynch VM; Anslyn EV, Probing intramolecular B-N interactions in ortho-aminomethyl arylboronic acids. J. Org. Chem 2009, 74 (11), 4055–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Appel EA; Forster RA; Koutsioubas A; Toprakcioglu C; Scherman OA, Activation energies control the macroscopic properties of physically cross-linked materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53 (38), 10038–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wulff G; Lauer M; Böhnke H, Rapid Proton Transfer as Cause of an Unusually Large Neighboring Group Effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 1984, 23 (9), 741–742. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Springsteen G; Wang B, A detailed examination of boronic acid–diol complexation. Tetrahedron 2002, 58 (26), 5291–5300. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.London RE; Gabel SA, Fluorine-19 NMR Studies of Fluorobenzeneboronic Acids. 1. Interaction Kinetics with Biologically Significant Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 2562–2569. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.American Chemical Society, Division of Organic Chemistry, pKa Values in Water Compilation (by R. Williams). https://organicchemistrydata.org/hansreich/resources/pka/pka_data/pka-compilation-williams.pdf.
  • 70.Lin M; Sun P; Chen G; Jiang M, The glyco-stereoisomerism effect on hydrogelation of polymers interacting via dynamic covalent bonds. Chem. Commun 2014, 50 (68), 9779–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tarus D; Hachet E; Messager L; Catargi B; Ravaine V; Auzely-Velty R, Readily prepared dynamic hydrogels by combining phenyl boronic acid- and maltose-modified anionic polysaccharides at neutral pH. Macromol. Rapid. Commun 2014, 35 (24), 2089–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

RESOURCES