Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;41(16):3076–3089. doi: 10.1002/sim.9405

TABLE 2.

Simulated performance of surveillance anchored sieve analysis for an idealized two period deferred vaccination design

Ancestral strain Variant strain Test H0(W) Test H0(S)
Scenario VE10 VE20 VE11 VE21
S=0
S=1
Period 1 Period 2
1. Reference 0.8998 0.8955 0.8955 0.8958 0.0499 0.0451 0.0475 0.0460
(0.0105) (0.0336) (0.0337) (0.0337)
2. Waning VE 0.9000 0.7909 0.7902 0.5814 0.8235 0.9856 0.8055 0.9709
(0.0105) (0.0598) (0.0609) (0.1143)
3. p20=0.80 0.8999 0.8868 0.8868 0.8870 0.0415 0.0496 0.0373 0.0438
(0.0105) (0.0626) (0.0540) (0.0546)
4. p20/p21=1.50 a 0.8998 0.8954 0.8429 0.8425 0.0469 0.0477 0.2856 0.2840
(0.0104) (0.0332) (0.0519) (0.0513)
5. p20/p21=0.67 a 0.9000 0.8952 0.9298 0.9298 0.0454 0.0470 0.2793 0.2804
(0.0105) (0.0336) (0.0230) (0.0228)

Note: During period 1 (period 2) the expected actual (counterfactual) placebo case count is 1000 (500). The true VEKS=0.90 except for scenario 2 with VE11, VE20, VE21 = 0.80, 0.80,0.60. The VE columns report the Monte Carlo means and (standard deviations). The right columns report the rejection rates for H0(W):VE1S=VE2S and H0(S):VEK0=VEK1, respectively, based on a Wald test. 10 000 trials are simulated per row.

a

True ratio is as given but offsets incorrectly use ratio of 1.00.