Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 3;92(5):1007–1014. doi: 10.1111/ans.17667

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Country Setting Design Sample size Case Follow‐up Source of funding Risk of bias (percentage)
Fukuhara (2020) 15 United States Hospital Case study 1 Aortic dissection repair Short term (to clinic) None 59.38
Fukuhara (2020) 16 United States Hospital Case series 24 Aortic dissection repair Hospital Admission None 67.19
Hussain (2020) 17 United Kingdom Hospital Case study 1 AVR Hospital Admission None 62.50
Rescigno (2020) 18 United Kingdom Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 62.50
Salna (2020) 19 United States Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 65.63
Silveira (2020) 20 Brazil Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 65.63
Varela Barca (2020) 21 Spain Hospital Case study 1 AVR Hospital Admission None 59.38
Yandrapalli (2020) 22 United States Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 65.63
Farsky (2021) 23 Brazil Hospital Case series 3 CABG Hospital Admission None 62.50
Romiti (2020) 24 Italy Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 62.50
Farina (2020) 25 Italy Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 60.94
Montandrau (2020) 26 France Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission None 64.06
Schwerzmann (2021) 27 Switzerland Hospital Cohort 1 AVR + Ascending Aorta Replacement Hospital Admission Internal research funding 65.63
Soetisna (2021) 28 Indonesia Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission Not stated 64.06
Darvishi (2021) 29 Iran Hospital Case study 1 CABG + Pericardiotomy Hospital Admission Not stated 56.25
Lopez‐Marco (2021) 30 UK Hospital Cohort 3 Aortic Dissection Repair Hospital Admission None 64.06
Keaton‐Nasser (2021) 31 USA Hospital Case study 1 CABG Hospital Admission Not stated 53.13
Omar(2021) 32 Qatar Hospital Case Series 3 CABG Hospital Admission Corporate 62.50

Average score on downs and black checklist. 28