Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;16:26323524221095102. doi: 10.1177/26323524221095102

Table 1.

Data collection overview.

Baseline 6 months 12 months
Key informants:
Interviews of feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability (n = 26)
Key informants:
Postimplementation interviews of feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability (n = 16)
Nav-CARE volunteers:
Self-perceived efficacy in navigation questionnaire (n = 86/87)
Volunteer QOL using SF12v2 (n = 86/87)
Nav-CARE volunteers:
Self-perceived efficacy in navigation questionnaire (n = 50/38/70)
Volunteer QOL using SF12v2 (n = 49/38/70)
Volunteer satisfaction questionnaire. (n = 55/38/70)
Semi-structured interview (n = 58/38/70)
Nav-CARE volunteers:
Self-perceived efficacy in navigation questionnaire (n = 33/27/62)
Volunteer QOL using SF12v2 (n = 33/37/62)
Volunteer satisfaction questionnaire. (n = 32/37/62)
Semi-structured interview (n = 30/37/62)
Nav-CARE clients:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 50/50)
Engagement questionnaire (n = 50/50)
Nav-CARE client:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 28/36)
Engagement questionnaire (n = 29/36)
Semistructured interview (n = 32/36)
Nav-CARE client:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 27/29)
Engagement questionnaire (n = 27/29)
Nav-CARE family caregivers:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 7/7)
Nav-CARE family caregivers:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 3/6)
Semistructured interview (n = 3/6)
Nav-CARE family caregivers:
QOL using SF12v2 (n = 3/6)

Volunteer n = number of responses/number of volunteers with a client/ all active volunteers at a time point.