Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;11:29. doi: 10.1186/s40164-022-00282-1

Table 2.

The clinical characteristics of 20 cases diagnosed with de novo or R/R AML

Patient No Age (yrs) Gender WBC (× 109) LDH (U/L) Blasts (%) Karyotype Molecular features
1 68 F 4.85 Normal 24 Normal /
2 66 M 48.34 High 36 46, XY, t (2;22) TET2
3 55 F 21.38 High 69 Complex NPM1, TET2, ASXL1
4 57 M 47.34 High 74 46, XY, t (8;21) AML-ETO
5 32 M 324.4 High 92 46, XX, inv (16) CBFB-MYH11
6 60 M 52.12 Normal 43 Normal CEBPA, TET2
7 64 F 16.12 High 62 Normal IDH, Runx1
8 28 F 15.63 High 52 46, XY, inv (16) CBFB-MYH11, ASXL1, CEBPA
9 44 M 23.56 Normal 46 Normal /
10 9 F 581.8 High 92 ND /
11 11 M 48.65 High 57 Normal /
12 6 F 231.2 High 78 Complex FLT3-ITD
13 5 M 180.3 High 43 46, XX, del (14) (q32) /
14 10 F 53.1 High 64 Normal c-KIT
15 58 M 45.3 Normal 36 45, XY, − 7 TP53
16 46 F 153.2 High 76 Complex FLT3-ITD
17 32 F 201.2 High 91 46, XX ASXL1
18 40 M 53.4 High 45 45, XY, − 5 /
19 19 M 75.3 High 58 46, XY DNMT3A
20 23 F 121.5 Normal 48 Normal CEBPA