Table 2.
AMB IFA supplementation coverage index values for seven beneficiary groups, 2017–18 to 2019–20
| States | AMB index 2017–18 | AMB Index 2019–20 | Change (2017–18 to 2019–20) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andaman & Nicobar Islands | NA | 86.6 | NA |
| Puducherry | 52.1 | 70.9 | 18.8 |
| Gujarat | 51 | 63.1 | 12 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 17.7 | 62.4 | 44.7 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 60.4 | 61.3 | 0.9 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 46.7 | 60 | 13.3 |
| Goa | NA | 59.4 | NA |
| Maharashtra | 49.3 | 58.2 | 8.9 |
| Assam | 45.6 | 58 | 12.4 |
| Haryana | 29.4 | 56.8 | 27.4 |
| Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 27.3 | 52.2 | 24.9 |
| Karnataka | 42.2 | 49.3 | 7.1 |
| West Bengal | 27 | 49.1 | 22.1 |
| Chhattisgarh | NA | 46.2 | NA |
| Tamil Nadu | 50.8 | 44.7 | −6.1 |
| Orissa | 29.6 | 44.5 | 15 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 17.2 | 41.7 | 24.5 |
| Telangana | 30.5 | 41.4 | 11 |
| Daman & Diu | 33.6 | 36.3 | 2.7 |
| Uttarakhand | 9.2 | 35.3 | 26.1 |
| Bihar | 9.7 | 35.2 | 25.5 |
| Jharkhand | 24.3 | 35.1 | 10.8 |
| Sikkim | 54 | 35.1 | −19 |
| Punjab | 46.9 | 33.1 | −13.8 |
| Chandigarh | NA | 31.5 | NA |
| Mizoram | 32 | 27.1 | −4.9 |
| Rajasthan | 18.5 | 24.6 | 6.1 |
| NCT of Delhi | NA | 21.7 | NA |
| Kerala | 29.1 | 19.1 | −10 |
| Jammu & Kashmir | 16.3 | 17.7 | 1.4 |
| Lakshadweep | 21.9 | 17.1 | −4.8 |
| Meghalaya | 18.8 | 17.1 | −1.8 |
| Manipur | 13.6 | 13.2 | −0.4 |
| Tripura | 15.9 | 9.9 | −6 |
| Nagaland | 3.5 | 7.9 | 4.4 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 10.7 | NA | NA |
| India | 25.2 | 41.2 | 15.9 |
Source: Authors based on HMIS and AMB dashboard (www.anemiamuktbharat.info).