Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 9;32(10):2095–2111. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab340

Table 2.

Functional properties of L6A E⟶I synaptic connections

CT⟶FS (n = 4) CC⟶FS (n = 9) CCla⟶FS (n = 3) CT⟶nFS (n = 5) CC⟶nFS (n = 10) CCla⟶nFS (n = 2) Kruskal–Wallis test CT⟶FS versus CC⟶FS CT⟶nFS versus CC⟶nFS CT⟶FS versus CT⟶nFS CC⟶FS versus CC⟶nFS
Amplitude (mV) 0.22 ± 0.10 1.13 ± 0.78 2.84 ± 1.48 0.07 ± 0.06 0.16 ± 0.18 2.17, 1.03 * * *4.4E-07 * *0.0040 0.2522 0.3095 * * *0.0002
PPR (second/first) 3.47 ± 3.83 0.99 ± 0.21 0.85 ± 0.20 3.72 ± 1.58 2.32 ± 0.72 1.15, 1.38 * * *1.3E-06 * *0.0020 0.1535 0.3429 * * *9.1E-05
CV 1.50 ± 0.68 0.62 ± 0.26 0.30 ± 0.10 1.62 ± 0.62 1.22 ± 0.28 0.86, 0.57 * * *1.5E-05 * *0.0070 0.2828 0.6857 * * *0.0003
Failure rate (%) 57.7 ± 18.7 20.7 ± 20.6 0.0 ± 0.0 70.2 ± 9.7 59.0 ± 24.3 27.7, 12.5 * * *4.8E-04 *0.0130 0.6485 0.3429 *0.0195
Rise time (ms) 0.50 ± 0.28 0.83 ± 0.25 0.69 ± 0.22 0.75 ± 0.74 1.12 ± 0.51 0.71, 0.61 0.2175 0.2000 0.3833 1.2000 0.1638
Latency (ms) 1.11 ± 0.52 1.03 ± 0.41 0.73 ± 0.52 1.85 ± 1.10 1.36 ± 0.58 0.88, 1.31 0.6007 0.5818 0.6303 0.8000 0.1388
Decay time (ms) 10.5 ± 1.7 12.3 ± 5.8 14.0 ± 10.6 16.9 ± 10.1 16.0 ± 5.7 14.3, 10.2 0.5177 0.9091 0.9048 1.2000 0.2977

Bold italic font indicates significant differences; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for Kruskal–Wallis test among multiple groups followed by post hoc Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test between individual groups.