Table 2.
CT⟶FS (n = 4) | CC⟶FS (n = 9) | CCla⟶FS (n = 3) | CT⟶nFS (n = 5) | CC⟶nFS (n = 10) | CCla⟶nFS (n = 2) | Kruskal–Wallis test | CT⟶FS versus CC⟶FS | CT⟶nFS versus CC⟶nFS | CT⟶FS versus CT⟶nFS | CC⟶FS versus CC⟶nFS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amplitude (mV) | 0.22 ± 0.10 | 1.13 ± 0.78 | 2.84 ± 1.48 | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0.16 ± 0.18 | 2.17, 1.03 | * * *4.4E-07 | * *0.0040 | 0.2522 | 0.3095 | * * *0.0002 |
PPR (second/first) | 3.47 ± 3.83 | 0.99 ± 0.21 | 0.85 ± 0.20 | 3.72 ± 1.58 | 2.32 ± 0.72 | 1.15, 1.38 | * * *1.3E-06 | * *0.0020 | 0.1535 | 0.3429 | * * *9.1E-05 |
CV | 1.50 ± 0.68 | 0.62 ± 0.26 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 1.62 ± 0.62 | 1.22 ± 0.28 | 0.86, 0.57 | * * *1.5E-05 | * *0.0070 | 0.2828 | 0.6857 | * * *0.0003 |
Failure rate (%) | 57.7 ± 18.7 | 20.7 ± 20.6 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 70.2 ± 9.7 | 59.0 ± 24.3 | 27.7, 12.5 | * * *4.8E-04 | *0.0130 | 0.6485 | 0.3429 | *0.0195 |
Rise time (ms) | 0.50 ± 0.28 | 0.83 ± 0.25 | 0.69 ± 0.22 | 0.75 ± 0.74 | 1.12 ± 0.51 | 0.71, 0.61 | 0.2175 | 0.2000 | 0.3833 | 1.2000 | 0.1638 |
Latency (ms) | 1.11 ± 0.52 | 1.03 ± 0.41 | 0.73 ± 0.52 | 1.85 ± 1.10 | 1.36 ± 0.58 | 0.88, 1.31 | 0.6007 | 0.5818 | 0.6303 | 0.8000 | 0.1388 |
Decay time (ms) | 10.5 ± 1.7 | 12.3 ± 5.8 | 14.0 ± 10.6 | 16.9 ± 10.1 | 16.0 ± 5.7 | 14.3, 10.2 | 0.5177 | 0.9091 | 0.9048 | 1.2000 | 0.2977 |
Bold italic font indicates significant differences; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for Kruskal–Wallis test among multiple groups followed by post hoc Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test between individual groups.