Table 4.
Data extraction for studies included in the systematic review assessing facilitators and barriers of children participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions from the researchers’ perspective
| Author (s) |
Study name or aim |
Type of study |
Population | Setting and dates of study |
Ethics | Outcome (s) |
Methods | Facilitators | Barriers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blanchet et al. (2015)36 | Strategies and challenges in recruiting black immigrant mothers for a community-based study. | Mixed methods (non RCT) | 259 mothers of 6-12-year black immigrant children of African and Caribbean decent. | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2014 - 2015 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Diet | Review of calling lists, consultation with recruiters, verification of emails, and participants’ calls. Interviews were conducted at participants’ home in French or English |
|
|
| Chang et al. (2009)50 | Participant recruitment and retention in a program to prevent weight gain in overweight mothers. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 129 low-income overweight young mothers with children 0-3.5 years | Southern Michigan Woman Infant Children (WIC) programs, USA. 2007 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Diet, physical activity, stress management | Identification of predictors from data review and recruiters' log notes. |
|
|
| Croyden et al. (2018)51 | Lessons learnt from the child obesity management program in Australia: PEACH™. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 353 parents of children 5-17 years | PEACH study. Queensland, Australia. 2011-2016 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. | Obesity | Narrative review of recruitment strategies and evaluation of study records. |
|
|
| Cruz et al. (2014)44 | Child Health Initiative for Lifelong Eating and Exercise (CHILE). | Mixed methods (RCT) | 1,879 children, 655 parents, 7 grocery stores and 14 healthcare providers from low-income communities in rural areas with high prevalence of American Indian | 16 Head Start centers in New Mexico, USA. 2006- 2010 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. Tribe also reviewed protocols, agreements, and resolutions and provided a letter of support. | Obesity prevention program | Interviews conducted with parents being recruited for a multi-level, group RCT and review of study records. |
|
|
| Cui Z et al. (2019)38 | Recruitment strategies for the Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR) Consortium. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 1745 parents and children (racially/ethnically diverse; many were recent immigrant families) | family, school, clinic, churches, grocery stores, recreational centers in Cleveland, Minnesota, California, Tennessee, USA | IRB approval and consent obtained from participants. Inclusion of certificate of confidentiality or explicit discussion of the privacy of participant |
Obesity | Data review of strategies used. A group of parents preview the consent materials, |
|
|
| Czymoniewicz et al. (2017)37 | Patterns of participation in the Grow Face-to-Face and Grow Online parenting program. | Mixed Methods (non-RCT) | 111 parents with health children 5-10 years old | Local YMCA in central Pennsylvania, USA. 2015-2017 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Review of attendance records, surveys and semi-structured, in-depth interviews. |
|
|
| DeFrank et al. (2019)39 | Recruitment and retention strategies and lessons learned from the Intervention INC trial. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | Black/AA and Latino children (ages 9–12 years) and their parent/guardian | Community/school-based organizations in low-income neighborhoods. Harlem, New York, USA | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Review of recruitment strategies. |
|
|
| Fleming et al. (2015)46 | Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health RCT. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 115 families with obese children aged 6–11 years | Medical centers, schools, community, public events. West Midlands, UK. 2010-2014 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Obesity treatment | Evaluation of study records and questionnaire and interviews with recruited parents/caregivers. Recruitment: 24 months (2012-2013); Data collection for 10 weeks; sessions 2.5 hours/wk on Saturdays; Duration of focus interview: 20 minutes |
|
|
| Gerards et al. (2012)34 | Barriers for health care professionals for referring parents of overweight children to an obesity prevention intervention. | Qualitative | 16 nurses, physicians and management staff from 11 clinics attending parents of overweight children aged | 11 health clinics, Maastrich, The Netherlands. 2010 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Semi-structured interviews to health care professionals. |
|
|
| Guzman et al. (2009)40 | Recruitment and retention of Latino children in a lifestyle intervention. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 159 Latino parents and children | Clinical setting in North Carolina, USA. 2005-2006 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. Consents were provided in English or Spanish. | Lifestyle intervention | Review of recruitment strategies. |
|
|
| Kafka et al. (2008)35 | To explore children's motivations and barriers to nutrition research participation. | Qualitative | 35 children aged 7–10 years recreational and competitive soccer players |
Indoor sports center. Acton, Massachusetts, USA. 2008 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Nutrition | Focus group with children to learn how to make research better for children. Main study objectives: examine how the nutrient density and antioxidant content of 3 snacks affected exercise intensity, fatigue, blood glucose (finger prick before and after the match), and other biochemical marker (saliva). |
|
|
| McCullough et al. (2016)25 | Barriers to Recruitment in Pediatric Obesity Trials: Comparing Opt-in and Opt-out Recruitment Approaches. | Quantitative RCT | Investigators of 3 trials in children 2-7 years (CHIRP & LAUNCH) and children 8-12 years (E-FLIP) | 10 rural communities in North Central Florida, USA. 2009-2015 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity treatment | Review of opt-in strategies (parents contact researchers in response to mailings) and opt-out strategies (parents send decline postcard in response to mailings). |
|
|
| Metayer et al. (2018)26 | Recruitment of new immigrants into an RCT: The Live Well Experience. | Quantitative RCT | New immigrant mothers and children from Brazil, Spanish-speaking Latino or Haitian descent with over 10 years in the US and with a child 3-12 years | Community Centers in Somerville, MA, USA. 2009-2011 | Consent obtained from participants | Lifestyle intervention | Review of recruitment data to inform ongoing process evaluation. |
|
|
| Nicholson et al. (2006)27 | Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. | Quantitative RCT | 306 mothers 15-42 years of age (AA, non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics) | Low Income, ethnic neighborhoods in Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2005-2006 | Consent obtained from participants | Nutrition | Description of specific strategies employed to successfully recruit and retain participants. |
|
|
| Raynor et al. (2009)28 | Evaluation of active and passive recruitment methods used in randomized controlled trials targeting pediatric obesity.\ | Quantitative RCT | 164 families with overweight children 4-9 years | Community health centers, children’s health centers, schools, Internet, radio, newspapers and TV in Massachusetts, USA. 2005-2007 | Consent & assent obtained from participants | Weight management | Review of enrollment numbers and cost-effectiveness of active (physician referrals, targeted mailings) vs passive (adds and flyers, word of mouth) recruitment methods. |
|
|
RCT: randomized clinical trials; UK: United Kingdom; USA: United States of America; CHIRP: Community Health Lifestyle Intervention for Rural Preschoolers; LAUNCH: Learning about Activity and Understanding Nutrition for Child Health; E-FLIP: The Extension Family Lifestyle intervention project for Kids