Table 4.
Data extraction for studies included in the systematic review assessing facilitators and barriers of children participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions from the researchers’ perspective
Author (s) |
Study name or aim |
Type of study |
Population | Setting and dates of study |
Ethics | Outcome (s) |
Methods | Facilitators | Barriers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blanchet et al. (2015)36 | Strategies and challenges in recruiting black immigrant mothers for a community-based study. | Mixed methods (non RCT) | 259 mothers of 6-12-year black immigrant children of African and Caribbean decent. | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2014 - 2015 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Diet | Review of calling lists, consultation with recruiters, verification of emails, and participants’ calls. Interviews were conducted at participants’ home in French or English |
|
|
Chang et al. (2009)50 | Participant recruitment and retention in a program to prevent weight gain in overweight mothers. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 129 low-income overweight young mothers with children 0-3.5 years | Southern Michigan Woman Infant Children (WIC) programs, USA. 2007 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Diet, physical activity, stress management | Identification of predictors from data review and recruiters' log notes. |
|
|
Croyden et al. (2018)51 | Lessons learnt from the child obesity management program in Australia: PEACH™. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 353 parents of children 5-17 years | PEACH study. Queensland, Australia. 2011-2016 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. | Obesity | Narrative review of recruitment strategies and evaluation of study records. |
|
|
Cruz et al. (2014)44 | Child Health Initiative for Lifelong Eating and Exercise (CHILE). | Mixed methods (RCT) | 1,879 children, 655 parents, 7 grocery stores and 14 healthcare providers from low-income communities in rural areas with high prevalence of American Indian | 16 Head Start centers in New Mexico, USA. 2006- 2010 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. Tribe also reviewed protocols, agreements, and resolutions and provided a letter of support. | Obesity prevention program | Interviews conducted with parents being recruited for a multi-level, group RCT and review of study records. |
|
|
Cui Z et al. (2019)38 | Recruitment strategies for the Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR) Consortium. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 1745 parents and children (racially/ethnically diverse; many were recent immigrant families) | family, school, clinic, churches, grocery stores, recreational centers in Cleveland, Minnesota, California, Tennessee, USA | IRB approval and consent obtained from participants. Inclusion of certificate of confidentiality or explicit discussion of the privacy of participant |
Obesity | Data review of strategies used. A group of parents preview the consent materials, |
|
|
Czymoniewicz et al. (2017)37 | Patterns of participation in the Grow Face-to-Face and Grow Online parenting program. | Mixed Methods (non-RCT) | 111 parents with health children 5-10 years old | Local YMCA in central Pennsylvania, USA. 2015-2017 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Review of attendance records, surveys and semi-structured, in-depth interviews. |
|
|
DeFrank et al. (2019)39 | Recruitment and retention strategies and lessons learned from the Intervention INC trial. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | Black/AA and Latino children (ages 9–12 years) and their parent/guardian | Community/school-based organizations in low-income neighborhoods. Harlem, New York, USA | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Review of recruitment strategies. |
|
|
Fleming et al. (2015)46 | Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health RCT. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 115 families with obese children aged 6–11 years | Medical centers, schools, community, public events. West Midlands, UK. 2010-2014 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Obesity treatment | Evaluation of study records and questionnaire and interviews with recruited parents/caregivers. Recruitment: 24 months (2012-2013); Data collection for 10 weeks; sessions 2.5 hours/wk on Saturdays; Duration of focus interview: 20 minutes |
|
|
Gerards et al. (2012)34 | Barriers for health care professionals for referring parents of overweight children to an obesity prevention intervention. | Qualitative | 16 nurses, physicians and management staff from 11 clinics attending parents of overweight children aged | 11 health clinics, Maastrich, The Netherlands. 2010 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity prevention | Semi-structured interviews to health care professionals. |
|
|
Guzman et al. (2009)40 | Recruitment and retention of Latino children in a lifestyle intervention. | Mixed Methods (RCT) | 159 Latino parents and children | Clinical setting in North Carolina, USA. 2005-2006 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants. Consents were provided in English or Spanish. | Lifestyle intervention | Review of recruitment strategies. |
|
|
Kafka et al. (2008)35 | To explore children's motivations and barriers to nutrition research participation. | Qualitative | 35 children aged 7–10 years recreational and competitive soccer players |
Indoor sports center. Acton, Massachusetts, USA. 2008 | IRB approval and consent & assent obtained from participants | Nutrition | Focus group with children to learn how to make research better for children. Main study objectives: examine how the nutrient density and antioxidant content of 3 snacks affected exercise intensity, fatigue, blood glucose (finger prick before and after the match), and other biochemical marker (saliva). |
|
|
McCullough et al. (2016)25 | Barriers to Recruitment in Pediatric Obesity Trials: Comparing Opt-in and Opt-out Recruitment Approaches. | Quantitative RCT | Investigators of 3 trials in children 2-7 years (CHIRP & LAUNCH) and children 8-12 years (E-FLIP) | 10 rural communities in North Central Florida, USA. 2009-2015 | Consent obtained from participants | Obesity treatment | Review of opt-in strategies (parents contact researchers in response to mailings) and opt-out strategies (parents send decline postcard in response to mailings). |
|
|
Metayer et al. (2018)26 | Recruitment of new immigrants into an RCT: The Live Well Experience. | Quantitative RCT | New immigrant mothers and children from Brazil, Spanish-speaking Latino or Haitian descent with over 10 years in the US and with a child 3-12 years | Community Centers in Somerville, MA, USA. 2009-2011 | Consent obtained from participants | Lifestyle intervention | Review of recruitment data to inform ongoing process evaluation. |
|
|
Nicholson et al. (2006)27 | Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. | Quantitative RCT | 306 mothers 15-42 years of age (AA, non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics) | Low Income, ethnic neighborhoods in Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2005-2006 | Consent obtained from participants | Nutrition | Description of specific strategies employed to successfully recruit and retain participants. |
|
|
Raynor et al. (2009)28 | Evaluation of active and passive recruitment methods used in randomized controlled trials targeting pediatric obesity.\ | Quantitative RCT | 164 families with overweight children 4-9 years | Community health centers, children’s health centers, schools, Internet, radio, newspapers and TV in Massachusetts, USA. 2005-2007 | Consent & assent obtained from participants | Weight management | Review of enrollment numbers and cost-effectiveness of active (physician referrals, targeted mailings) vs passive (adds and flyers, word of mouth) recruitment methods. |
|
|
RCT: randomized clinical trials; UK: United Kingdom; USA: United States of America; CHIRP: Community Health Lifestyle Intervention for Rural Preschoolers; LAUNCH: Learning about Activity and Understanding Nutrition for Child Health; E-FLIP: The Extension Family Lifestyle intervention project for Kids