Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;15:2911–2923. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S365090

Table 2.

Histological Quantitative Evaluation of Gastric Tissue Sections

Experimental Groups N=6 Mucosal Erosion (Mean%) * Edema & Inflammatory Exudate (Mean%) * Inflammatory Cells (Mean%) * Necrotic Debris (Mean%) * Hemorrhage (Mean%) * Lesion Scoring (0 −100%) Lesion Grading
(G1) NCG 2.03% A# 5.76%A 7.12%A 4.76%A 8.01%A 0–10% No lesion
(G2) PCG 94.23% E 91.07%E 93.28%E 88.56%E 84.67%D 75–100% Severe
(G3) PCG+LPZ 30mg/kg 58.35%B 71.21%D 73.42%D 56.81%B 64.98%C 50–75% Moderate
(G4) PCG+AZI 1mg/kg 81.56%D 87.39%E 84.21%D 79.82%D 75.14%D 75–100% Severe
(G5) PCG+AZI 5mg/kg 76.19%D 74.11%D 79.85%D 73.25%D 74.89%D 50–100% Moderate-Severe
(G6) PCG+AZI 10mg/kg 62.73%C 73.61%D 74.81%D 64.19%C 59.79%B 50–75% Moderate

Notes: *All morphometric values of lesion scoring analysis were estimated in mean average, each value represents the mean percentage (%) of eight animals (n=8). #Statistical comparison among groups: Mean values with different capital letters (A,B,C,D,E) have significant differences at (P < 0.05). G1: Negative control group (NCG); G2: Positive control group (PCG); G3: Positive control group with Lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg/kg; G4: Positive control group with Azilsartan (AZI) 1 mg/kg; G5: Positive control group with Azilsartan (AZI) 5 mg/kg; G6: Positive control group with Azilsartan (AZI) 10 mg/kg.