Table 2.
Machine learning methods | Data source | |
---|---|---|
Causality assessment scales | ||
SVM, Bayesian classifier, decision tree and/or Random Forest [86–88] |
Social media [88] |
|
Regression [89] | ||
Neural network [90, 91] | ||
Propensity score matching | ||
SVM, Bayesian classifier, decision tree and/or Random Forest [92, 93] | ||
Ensemble (boosting/bagging) [20, 92, 94, 95, 99] | ||
Regression [20, 94, 95, 97] | ||
Neural network [96, 98, 100] | ||
Graph-based causal inference | ||
SVM, Bayesian classifier, decision tree and/or Random Forest | ||
Link prediction [101] | ||
Recommendation systems [109] | ||
Classification [110] | ||
Graph embedding | ||
Link prediction [13, 102] | ||
Recommendation Systems [105] | ||
Regression | ||
Classification [103] | ||
Neural network | ||
Link prediction [104] | ||
Recommendation systems [106] | ||
Predictive modeling [107, 108] | ||
Ensemble (boosting/bagging) | ||
Classification [111] | ||
Link prediction [112] | ||
Instrumental variables | ||
Clustering [113] |
Simulated data [16, 114, 115, 117–119] Social network data [115] |
|
Decision tree [16] | ||
Neural network [114–117] | ||
New algorithms [118, 119] |
RWD real-world data, SRS spontaneous reporting system, SVM support vector machine
Papers for “propensity score matching” and “instrumental variables” are not applied in the field of pharmacovigilance. Papers for “graph-based causal inference” still lacks a clear causal interpretation from a graph perspective