Table 2.
Criteria | Definition |
---|---|
Validity |
The capacity of the PROM to describe the trait it intends to measure e.g., content-related, criterion-related, predictive |
Reliability |
The consistency of the measurements taken by the PROM “How the person functions” in regards to their vision e.g., test–retest, internal consistency, inter-interviewer reproducibility |
Sensitivity |
The instruments’ ability to detect a change in the population e.g., effect size, standard error |
Representative populationa |
A PROM should be developed with the target population for the target population In the case of IRD, there are many subtypes and so a representative sample for PROM development consisting of IRD’s three electroretinogram subtypes (rod-cone dystrophy, cone/cone-rod dystrophy, and macular dystrophy) |
PROM patient-reported outcome measure
aAdditional criteria set out by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)