Table 2.
SGLT2 inhibitor vs. DPP-4 inhibitor | SGLT2 inhibitor vs. sulfonylurea | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity analysis | SGLT2 inhibitor, n | DPP-4 inhibitor, n | aHR (95% CI) | SGLT2 inhibitor, n | Sulfonylurea, n | aHR (95% CI) |
Increasing permissible grace period between consecutive refills from 30 to 60 days | 85,125 | 85,125 | 1.77 (1.48, 2.12) | 72,436 | 72,436 | 1.60 (1.34, 1.92) |
Increasing permissible grace period between consecutive refills from 30 to 60 days | 85,125 | 85,125 | 1.78 (1.49, 2.13) | 72,436 | 72,436 | 1.62 (1.35, 1.94) |
Trimming PS distribution tail to 95th and 5th percentile | 84,992 | 84,992 | 1.62 (1.34, 1.94) | 71,592 | 71,592 | 1.56 (1.30, 1.87) |
Trimming PS distribution tail to 85th and 15th percentile | 79,510 | 79,510 | 1.67 (1.38, 2.02) | 58,495 | 58,495 | 1.45 (1.20, 1.76) |
Trimming PS distribution tail to 75th and 25th percentile | 63,126 | 63,126 | 1.67 (1.35, 2.05) | 39,063 | 39,063 | 1.49 (1.20, 1.85) |
Adjusting for PS in the primary outcome model | 100,046 | 212,311 | 1.53 (1.29, 1.84) | 84,583 | 296,947 | 1.47 (1.18, 1.82) |
Limiting the study period to 2015 | 26,333 | 26,333 | 1.26 (1.02, 1.57) | 22,968 | 22,968 | 1.53 (1.21, 1.93) |