TABLE 4.
Authors (years) | Study design | Major findings |
---|---|---|
Cozin et al. (2011) | Primary gingival fibroblasts were exposed to zoledronate or pamidronate with or without GGOH. | GGOH alone is inert to the cells |
GGOH ↑ cell proliferation and migration, ↓ adhesion defect (cell-substratum adhesion and F-actin bundles) caused by zoledronate effectively (3 × 10−5 M) and not pamidronate (6 × 10−5 M) | ||
Ziebart et al. (2011) | Commercially available HUVEC and human gingival fibroblasts cultured with BPs with or without GGOH for 72 h. All BPs at 5 × 10−5 M, GGOH at 10−5 M | HUVEC: GGOH ↑ cell viability and migration suppressed by ibandronate and zoledronate |
Fibroblasts: GGOH ↑ cell viability suppressed by zoledronate; ↑ cell migration by ibandronate, pamidronate and zoledronate | ||
GGOH cellular cytoskeletal distortion in cells exposed to all BPs | ||
Zafar et al. (2014) | Human gingival fibroblasts from 5 female patients were cultured with 3 × 10−5 M zoledronate with or without farnesol (10−5 M) or GGOH (5 × 10−5 M) for 72 h | GGOH alone ↓ cell viability but ↑ cell viability in the presence of zoledronate |
GGOH preserves the morphology of cells exposed to zoledronate | ||
GGOH ↓ BMP2 and VEGF-A expression induced by zoledronate | ||
Hagelauer et al. (2015) | Commercialised human gingival fibroblasts and HUVEC were treated with zoledronate, GGOH, farnesol or other isoprenoids | GGOH alone: High dose (5 × 10−5–10−4 M) ↓ cell viability, no effects on migration (10−5–10−6 M) |
GGOH + zoledronate: ↑ cell viability and migration suppressed by zoledronate at all concentrations (10−5–10−6 M) | ||
GGOH reverses destructive cellular morphology |
Abbreviation↓, decrease; ↑, increase; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein-2; BP, bisphosphonate; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; GGOH, geranylgeraniol; VEGF-A, vascular endothelial growth factor-A.