Skip to main content
. 2022 May 4;13:866701. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866701

Table 4.

Comparison of studies screening large IIM cohorts for anti-HMGCR autoantibodies.

Ge et al. (11) Watanabe et al. (10) Williams et al. (12) Current study
Population 405 patients (Bohan and Peter diagnostic criteria from 1975) 387 patients (exclusion of non-IIM and IBM patients) 23 IMNM anti-HMGCR–positive patients 312 patients (ACR/EULAR classification criteria from 2017)
Anti-HMGCR autoantibodies assessment method ELISA ELISA Chemiluminescence ELISA, IP-IVTT
Anti-HMGCR–positive patients 22 (5.4%) 47 (12%) 23 (100%) 13 (4.3%)
Dermatomyositis phenotype 8 (36%) 2 (4%) 13 (57%) 5 (38%)
Females 16 (73%) 31 (69%) 8 (35%) 11 (92,3%)
Previous exposure to statins 3/20 (15%) 8 (18%) 20 (87%) 2 (15%)
Dysphagia 11 (50%) 20 (44%) 4 (31%)
Elevated CK at the diagnosis 18/21 (85.6%) 42 (93%) 100% 9 (69%)
IMNM features in muscle biopsy 8/12 (67%) 19/23 (83%) 12 (92%)
Co-occurrence of other MSA 3 (14%) 0 4 (31%)

IIM, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; IBM, inclusion body myositis; CK, creatinine kinase; IMNM, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy; MSA, myositis-specific autoantibodies; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IP-IVTT, immunoprecipitation of in vitro transcribed and translated protein.