Skip to main content
. 2022 May 18;169:108228. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108228

Table 7.

Notations in our study.

Notations Definitions of notations
A={A1,Ai,,Am},0<i<m The set of alternatives; Ai represents alternative i; m alternatives
C={C1,Cj,,Cn},0<j<h<n The set of criteria; Cj represents alternative j; n criteria
α={α1,αk,,αp},0<k<p The set of DMs; αk represents DM k; p DMs
Rk Individual IF-decision matrix of αk
EIFSRk The entropy value of αk
dRk The degree of divergence
wdk The weight of αk
wd=wd1,wd2,,wdp Set of DMs weights
aBj The preference of the most important criteria B over the criteria j
AB Best-to-others vector
AW Other-to-worst vector
ajW The preference of criteria j over the worst criteria W
ξ Minimum value of objective function
ws=ws1,ws2,,wsn The set of subjective criteria weights
EIFSrj¯j=1,2,n The entropy value of Cj
dj(j=1,2,,n) The degree of divergence
ωojj=1,2,...n Objective weight of Cj
wo=wo1,wo2,,won The set of objective criterion weights
R The integrated weighting intuitionistic fuzzy decision matrix integrated wc and wd
Sa Score function
X+=x1+,x2+,...,xn+ The set of positive ideal solutions
X-=x1-,x2-,,xn- The set of negative ideal solutions
Si Group utility value of alternative i
Ri Individual regret value of alternative i
Qi Trade-off evaluation value of alternative i
wc=wc1,wc2,...wcn The set of final criterion weights