Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Nov;27(6):553–558. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000446

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients studied (i.e., low-volume and high-volume disease) and key outcomes for upfront docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer in three randomized trials

CHAARTED
n=397 docetaxel patients
STAMPEDE
N=1066 docetaxel patientsa
GETUG
N=189 docetaxel patients
Median age (range) 64 (36–91) 65–66a (60–70) 63 (57–68)

#/% Low volume 134 Unknown 100
#/% High volume 263 92

# (%) lung metastases NR 6 44 (11%)
# (%) liver metastases NR 13 12/395

HR overall survival (95% CI) 0.61 (0.47–0.8) 0.76 (0.62–0.93) 0.9 (0.69–1.81)

HR low volume 1.04 (0.7–1.55) Unknown 1.02 (0.67–1.55)
HR high volume 0.63 (0.5–0.79) 0.78 (0.56–1.09)

Any grade 3–4 toxicity 29.3% 52% NR
 Grade 3–4 neutropenia 12% 10.8% 41%b
 Grade 5 toxicity 1 (0.3%) 8 (1.2%) 4 (2.1%)

CHAARTED, ChemoHormonal Therapy versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; GETUG, Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs Urogenitales; NR, not reported.

a

Includes 550 standard of care (SOC) and docetaxel and 516 SOC and zoledronate and docetaxel.

b

The rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia decreased to 15% after an amendment to use prophylactic GCSF.

Adapted with permission [20■■,21■■,23■■].