Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;605(7910):567–574. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04671-8

Fig. 1. Time-resolved cryo-EM analysis of the conformational landscape of USP14–proteasome complexes in the act of substrate degradation.

Fig. 1

a, b, Cryo-EM density map of the substrate-engaged USP14–proteasome complex in state ED2.1USP14, viewed from the top (a) and side (b). c, Side view of the cryo-EM density map of the substrate-engaged USP14–proteasome complex in state ED4USP14. Compared to the view of ED2.1USP14 in b, USP14 is rotated about 30° to dock onto the AAA domain of RPT1. To visualize the substrate density inside the AAA-ATPase motor, the density of RPT5 is omitted in both b and c. d, Atomic model of state ED2.1USP14 viewed from the same perspective as in a. e, Kinetic changes of overall particle populations of SD-like and ED-like states versus EA-like states obtained from time-resolved cryo-EM analysis. EA-like states include EA1UBL, EA2.0UBL and EA2.1UBL. SD-like states include SBUSP14, SCUSP14 SD4USP14 and SD5USP14. ED-like states include ED4USP14, ED5USP14, ED0USP14, ED1USP14, ED2.0USP14 and ED2.1USP14. The control consists of previously reported data for substrate-free, USP14-free proteasome8. f, Kinetic changes of the particle populations of 13 coexisting conformational states of USP14-bound proteasome from the cryo-EM samples made at different time points after mixing the substrate with the USP14–proteasome complex in the presence of 1 mM ATP at 10 °C. Three substrate-inhibited intermediates (SBUSP14, SCUSP14 and SD4USP14) reach their maximal populations at around 5 min, in contrast to state SD5USP14 and six substrate-engaged states, which all reach their maximal populations at approximately 1 min. The number of particles used in e and f are provided in Extended Data Fig. 2b, c.