Skip to main content
. 2022 May 15;19:717–757. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.009

Table 3.

In-vitro corrosion performance of Mg and Mg alloys after implantation of various ions.

Substrate Ion implanted ionic oxide layer
(nm)
Ionic Penetration (nm) In Vitro corrosion conditions Icorr
uncoated
(A/cm2)
Icorr
Coated
(A/cm2)
Corrosion rate
(mm/year)
Ref.
AZ31 Al 13 SBF, 37.5 °C 2.82 × 10−5 3.36 × 10−5 [184]
AZ91 1.50 × 10−4 5.82 × 10−5
ZK60 Zr, O 23 80 SBF, 37 °C 4.09 × 10−4 1.1 × 10−7 [187]
WE43 Ti, O 32 64 SBF 3.27 × 10−4 1.44 × 10−5 [191]
Mg–1Ca Ag 50 70 Hank's solution, 37 °C [186]
Fe 70 110–120
Y 95 105 0.69 ± 0.18
Pure Mg Ce 26 70 Artificial Hand sweat 1.06 × 10−4 3.99 × 10−5 [183]
Ringer's solution 4.18 × 10−5 2.68 × 10−5
DMEM 2.04 × 10−5 5.20 × 10−6
Mg-Gd-Zn-Zr Sn 90 SBF 1.17 × 10−5 5.74 × 10−6 [192]
AZ91 Zr, N 16 80 NaCl 4.26 × 10−6 1.16 × 10−6 [190]
DMEM 1.08 × 10−5 3.92 × 10−7
Mg–1Ca Zn 150 SBF, 37 °C 2.48 × 10−4 3.21 × 10−4 [193]
Pure Mg Ca 45 30 SBF, 37.5 °C 1.61 × 10−4 1.00 × 10−4 [182]
Zn 1.40 × 10−4
AZ31 N 200 Hank's solution, 37 °C [194]
Pure Mg Zr 30 60 SBF 5.26 × 10−5 1.99 × 10−5 [195]