Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s42490-022-00061-3

Table 2.

Comparison of the average test results for diffuse glioma-subtypes using ellipse bounding box tumor data for 5 runs. The highest values obtained in each run are displayed in bold text. (a) Case-A for US dataset (1p/19q prediction). (b) Case-B for TCGA dataset (IDH genotype)

Run Dataset Accuracy (%) Precision (%) Sensitivity(%) Specificity(%) F1-Score(%)
(a) Case-A: Prediction Result on Ellipse Bounding Tumor Areas
1 65.97 70.00 69.14 61.90 69.57
2 US 71.53 74.10 75.93 65.87 75.00
3 (1p/19q Codel/ 68.06 72.73 69.14 66.67 70.90
4 Non-Codel) 71.18 74.25 76.54 65.87 75.38
5 72.57 73.45 80.25 62.70 76.70
Average(∣σ∣) 69.86 (2.46) 72.91(1.55) 74.20(4.39) 64.60 (1.92) 73.51(2.76)
(b) Case-B: Prediction Result on Ellipse Bounding Tumor Areas
1 79.55 85.03 71.71 87.37 77.80
2 TCGA 76.01 78.45 71.72 80.30 74.93
3 (IDH mut/ 80.30 86.23 72.73 87.88 78.91
4 wild-type) 82.58 88.69 75.25 89.90 81.42
5 79.04 85.80 70.20 87.88 77.22
Average(∣σ∣) 79.50(2.12) 84.84(3.42) 72.32(1.67) 86.65(3.28) 78.06 (2.13)