Table 5.
curative effect comparison between FCARMS and POEM group in the same HRM classification at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up
| HRM classification | 6-month | p | 1-year | p | 2-year | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remission n (%) |
Failure n (%) |
Remission n (%) |
Failure n (%) |
Remission n (%) |
Failure n (%) |
||||
| I | |||||||||
| FCARMS | 3(75) | 1(25) | – | 3(75) | 1(25) | – | 3(75) | 1(25) | – |
| POEM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| II | |||||||||
| FCARMS | 26(92.9) | 2(7.1) | 0.55 | 24(85.7) | 4(14.3) | 0.28 | 18(64.3) | 10(35.7) | 0.02 |
| POEM | 14(100) | 0 | 14(100) | 0 | 14(100) | 0(0) | |||
| III | |||||||||
| FCARMS | 29(100) | 0(0) | 0.15 | 25(86.2) | 4(13.8) | 1.00 | 19(65.5) | 10(34.5) | 0.20 |
| POEM | 17(89.5) | 2(10.5) | 16(84.2) | 3(15.8) | 16(84.2) | 3(15.8) | |||