Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Dec;32(5):1778–1787. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420001224

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations for key study variables.

Variable (units/range) N (%)/M (SD) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Controls
1. Sex (Male) 73 (59%) .07 −.08 .09 −.04 .02 .20* .10 .13 .13 .20*
2. Age (Months) 25.21 (9.67) - .04 .15 .02 .10 .00 −.20* −.22* −.13 −.12
3. Time (hrs post 7am) 4.83 (2.82) - −.12 −.06 .19* −.30** −.29** −.29** −.24* −.17
4. Last Task (0–6) 3.91 (2.19) - .05 .10 −.01 −.18 −.01 −.03 −.06
Predictors
5. Income (0–5) 1.33 (1.23) - .24** −.06 −.05 −.07 .09 −.08
6. Pos Parenting (1–5) 2.95 (.80) - −.22* −.09 −.22** −.26** −.30**
Outcome variables: salivary cortisol across a structured stress paradigm (μg/dL)
7. SR 1 (0 m) .18 (.15) - .37*** .43*** .44*** .64***
8. SR 2 (18 m) .15 (.11) - .64*** .46*** .35***
9. SR 3 (32 m) .14 (.13) - .48*** .58***
10. SR 4 (61 m) .13 (.12) - .79***
11. SR 5 (75 m) .12 (.12) -

Note. Time – time of the first sample in hours, centered at 7 am; Last Task – the last stress paradigm task the child completed (0 = all task completed, 3 = ‘scary mask’ task completed but not the ‘mechanical toy’ task, and 6 = no task completed); Income – categorical ratings based on the family income relative to the federal poverty line (FPL) (0 = 50% of the FPL and 5 = 300% of the FPL); Pos Parenting – positive parenting behaviors observed during the ‘3-bag’ task; SR1-SR5 –the average salivary cortisol values from each assessment time point.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001