Table 4.
Authors Date |
Country | Study design | Study population | Measure of employment | Measure of health | Statistical Analysis | Main findings of employment and health | Quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azaroff, 2004 | USA | Cross sectional Survey | N = 160 Refugees (Cambodia, Laos) |
Work hazards: Open-ended questions Employment conditions: Working hours and employment type |
Health problems Work-related symptoms |
Descriptive statistics Prevalence Ratio |
Prevalent workplace hazards reported included exposures to chemicals; inadequate ventilation; prolonged sitting or standing and awkward postures; unguarded machinery; long work hours. 26% of the respondents reported work-related backache and 9% reported work-related skin rashes. Working over 40 hours yielded a prevalence ratio of 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.7) for reporting a work-related health symptom, and working a late shift had a prevalence ratio of 1.5 (95% CI 1.0, 2,3) for reporting a work-related sign. |
Low |
Jen, 2018 | USA | Longitudinal study | Iraqi refugees N = 298 at baseline N = 290 refugees Y1 follow up N = 282 at Y2 follow up |
Employment status | Body Mass Index (BMI) Non-communicable Disease (NCD): composite score of self-reported NCD |
Linear regression | Unemployment at year 2 was associated with a higher number of non-communicable diseases (B = 0.35, SE = 0.13, p < 0.0001) and increased NCDs from baseline (B = 0.23, SE = 0.13, p < 0.01). Unemployment was not significantly associated with BMI or changes in BMI over the 2 years (p > 0.05) | Moderate |
Kraeh, 2016 | South Korea | Cross sectional survey | N = 394 North Korean Refugees |
Employment status | Physical health: Resting heart rate Psychological adjustment: Korean version of CES-D |
Linear regression | Employment status had a significant effect on psychological adjustment (B = 0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.028) and resting heart rate (B = −4.63, SE = 1.66, p = 0.006). Further analyses, found a significant indirect effect of employment status on resting heart rate via socio-cultural adjustment and psychological adjustment. | Moderate |
Ruiz, 2018 | UK | Cross sectional Survey |
N = 2360 Refugees N = 279,634 UK born |
Employment status Hours worked (weekly) |
Self-reported health problem | Linear regression models | 69% of refugees with health problems reported that this limits the kind or amount of work they can engage in compared with half of the natives and other migrants with health problems. Refugees are 14% more likely than non-refugees to report a health problem that limits the type of work they can do and 17% more likely to report a health problem that limits the amount of work they can engage in. | High |
Sundquist, 2003 | Sweden | Cross sectional survey | N = 333 Refugees |
Job demand: High/Low Decision latitude: High/Low Job strain: Yes/No Support: Low/Heigh |
Self-reported long-term illness. | Logistic regression | Refugees experiencing both high job demands and low decision latitude had an increased risk (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.42–2.13) of long-term illness. There was no interaction between migration status and high job strain. However, refugees with low social support at work had nearly twice (OR = 1.91, 95%CI (1.44–2.54)) as high a risk of long-term illness as Swedes with high-level work-related social support | Moderate |
Van Hanegem, 2011 | Netherlands | Longitudinal study | N = 40 Asylum seekers |
Employment status | Severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) | Risk Ratio | Unemployment was one of the specific risk indicators for asylum seekers to experience SAMM (RR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.5–6.6) | Moderate |
Zhang, 2021 | USA | Cross-sectional survey | N = 218 Burmese and Bhutanese refugees |
Employed as essential worker: Y/N | COVID 19 infection | Logistic regression | Being an essential worker was associated with COVID 19 infection (OR = 5.25; 95% CI, 1.21–22.78). The prevalence of COVID-19 was 13.6% among essential workers and 2.3% among nonessential workers. |
Moderate |
Abbreviations: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D), EuroQol-visual analogue scales (EQ-VAS), General Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5), Posttraumatic Symptom Scale (PTSS) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS), Refugee Health Screener (RHS), World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS).