Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2022 Jan 11;47(2):324–333. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01056-2

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of students and their associations with homelessness—23 state youth risk behavior surveys, 2019

Characteristics All %c Homelessness Statusa,b % (95% CI) Chi-square p value
Homeless (n = 4507) % (CI) Stably housed (n = 100,265) % (CI)
Total (N = 104,772)d 100 5.9 (4.9, 7.1) 94.1 (92.9, 95.1)
Sex < 0.0001
 Female 48.9 36.3 (31.2, 41.9) 50.3 (49.3, 51.3)
 Male 51.1 63.7 (58.1, 68.9) 49.7 (48.7, 50.8)
Race/ethnicity < 0.0001
 White, non-Hispanic 50.1 35.3 (28.6, 42.6) 51.5 (49.1, 53.9)
 Black, non-Hispanic 13.4 19.8 (15.8, 24.6) 12.5 (11.4, 13.6)
 Hispanic 25.0 36.0 (25.7, 47.8) 24.1 (21.3, 27.1)
Grade 0.0025
 9th 26.5 22.3 (18.7, 26.3) 26.6 (23.5, 30.0)
 10th 25.5 27.9 (20.3, 37.1) 25.3 (22.9, 27.8)
 11th 24.2 22.7 (17.9, 28.5) 24.4 (21.9, 27.1)
 12th 23.8 27.1 (20.3, 35.2) 23.8 (21.2, 26.5)
Sexual identitye < 0.0001
 Heterosexual (straight) 83.3 68.6 (63.8, 73.1) 84.2 (83.5, 84.8)
 Gay, lesbian, bisexual 11.9 20.5 (17.5, 23.9) 11.5 (11.0, 12.0)
 Not sure 4.7 10.9 (7.8, 15.0) 4.4 (3.9, 4.9)

CI confidence interval

a

Homelessness status was determined using the question: “During the past 30 days, where did you usually sleep?”

b

Chi-square tests were used for each variable to examine differences within categories. Bold text indicates a significant difference in homelessness status across levels of the demographic characteristics. Differences were considered significant if the chi-square p value was < 0.05

c

Weighted percentages; because of rounding, percentages may not add up to 100%

d

Unweighted sample size

e

Sexual identity not ascertained in Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, or South Dakota