Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2022 Jan 11;47(2):324–333. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01056-2

Table 4.

Demographic characteristics of students and their associations with homelessness—11 local school districts—youth risk behavior survey, 2019

Characteristics All %c Homelessness statusa,b % (95% CI) Chi-square p value
Homeless (n = 1530) % (CI) Stably housed (n = 21,466) % (CI)
Total (N = 22,996)d 100 6.6 (5.9, 7.4) 93.4 (92.6, 94.1)
Sex < 0.0001
 Female 49.5 37.4 (33.1, 42.0) 51.6 (50.1, 53.1)
 Male 50.5 62.6 (58.1, 66.9) 48.4 (46.9, 49.9)
Race/ethnicity < 0.0001
 White, non-Hispanic 27.9 16.9 (13.9, 20.4) 29.9 (28.6, 31.2)
 Black, non-Hispanic 33.8 43.4 (39.1, 47.8) 31.5 (29.8, 33.2)
 Hispanic 27.9 31.0 (26.9, 35.4) 27.8 (26.3, 29.3)
Grade 0.4715
 9th 28.1 26.1 (21.6, 31.2) 27.5 (24.6, 30.6)
 10th 25.7 25.2 (21.0, 30.0) 25.6 (23.0, 28.4)
 11th 23.6 22.5 (18.8, 26.7) 24.0 (21.3, 26.9)
 12th 22.7 26.2 (21.9, 31.0) 23.0 (20.1, 26.1)
Sexual identitye < 0.0001
 Heterosexual (straight) 80.5 65.1 (61.2, 68.8) 81.3 (80.3, 82.3)
 Gay, lesbian, bisexual 14.4 24.9 (21.8, 28.3) 14.0 (13.1, 14.8)
 Not sure 5.1 10.0 (7.6, 13.1) 4.7 (4.3, 5.2)

CI confidence interval

a

Homelessness status was determined using the question: “During the past 30 days, where did you usually sleep?”

b

Chi-square tests were used for each variable to examine differences within categories. Differences were considered significant if the chi-square p value was < 0.05

c

Weighted percentages; because of rounding, percentages may not add up to 100%

d

Unweighted sample size

e

Sexual identity not ascertained in Spartanburg County, SC