Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2021 Sep 28;35(1):314–331. doi: 10.1017/S0954579421000535

Table 3.

Mean/probability Comparisons of Early Family Environments Indicators between Profiles

Latent profiles

Underprivileged SES/distressed Underprivileged SES/healthy Low SES/distressed Low SES/healthy Privileged SES/healthy

9% 18% 25% 29% 19%

Variable M(SD) or proportion Range F/chi-squared Effect size (η2/OR)

Married mother 0.09a 0.08a 0.51b 0.50b 0.99 n/a 437.03*** 0.81, 10.18, 9.88, 732.80

Maternal education −0.98 (0.88)a −0.89 (0.84)a 0.08 (0.69)b −0.01 (0.68)b 1.17 (0.57) −2.99 to 2.68 286.51*** 0.49

Income-to-needs ratio −1.33 (1.00) −1.07 (0.96) 0.18 (0.56)a 0.16 (0.52)a 0.97 (0.51) −3.21 to 2.47 336.80*** 0.55

Occupational prestige −0.73 (0.63)a −0.57 (0.67)a −0.15 (0.78)b −0.27 (0.70)b 1.25 (0.10) −1.92 to 3.83 212.68*** 0.44

Maternal health insurance 0.89a 0.81a 0.75a 0.71a 0.99 n/a 78.93*** 0.54, 0.38, 0.13, 9.64

Learning materials −0.85 (1.08)a −0.91 (0.96)a 0.22 (0.82)b 0.17 (0.83)b 0.69 (0.48) −2.66 to 0.93 140.96*** 0.32

Economic strain 0.80 (1.06) 0.15 (0.87)a 0.34 (0.99)a −0.16 (0.84) −0.70 (0.81) −1.84 to 2.92 70.38*** 0.19

Residential crowding 0.32 (1.24)a 0.60 (1.04)a −0.02 (0.90)b 0.02 (0.88)b −0.67 (0.67) −2.28 to 3.88 52.17*** 0.20

Neighborhood safety −0.66 (1.04)a −0.72 (1.04)a −0.01 (0.88) 0.18 (0.77) 0.71 (0.76) −3.46 to 1.75 92.45*** 0.24

Maternal depression 1.31 (0.56) −0.44 (0.73)a 0.90 (0.67) −0.61 (0.63)b −0.47 (0.75)a,b −1.02 to 2.37 349.85*** 0.54

Maternal anxiety 1.18 (0.64) −0.70 (0.64)a 0.93 (0.60) −0.65 (0.66)a −0.15 (0.79) −1.14 to 2.60 366.40*** 0.55

Maternal somatization 1.30 (0.67) −0.18 (0.88) 0.55 (0.92) −0.44 (0.76)a −0.49 (0.76)a −1.11 to 2.53 148.25*** 0.33

Note. For the two binary indicators, married mothers and maternal health insurance, the proportions of mothers being married and having health insurance were presented; for the rest of the family environment indicators, standardized means are presented; differing subscripts within rows indicate significantly different means at p < .05; for the effect sizes of the two binary indicators, we presented odds-ratios indicating the likelihood of mothers endorsing a particular response on each binary item (i.e., married, having insurance) depending on their profile membership, using the Underprivileged SES/distressed profile as a reference group; the means of raw scores of each indicator are found in the supplemental materials section.

***

p < .001.