Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;10:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.01.009

Table 13.

Effects of subclinical necrotic enteritis challenge, diet type and supplemental enzymes on abundance of caecal bacteria group at 16 d of age (log10 genome DNA copies/g wet digesta).1,2

Main effects Bacillus Bacteroides Bifidobacterium Lactobacillus Enterobacteriaceae C. perfringens Ruminococcus
Challenge No 7.80 5.87 9.93a 11.03b 8.18b 1.83b 9.51
Yes 7.81 5.87 9.75b 11.23a 8.44a 9.32a 9.51
Diet type Wheat 7.76 5.91 10.04a 11.34a 8.42a 5.80 9.47
Maize 7.85 5.83 9.63b 10.92b 8.20b 5.35 9.55
Enzyme Control 7.82 5.90 9.79 11.11 8.35 5.67 9.52
XYN10 7.82 5.96 9.70 11.24 8.24 4.89 9.53
XYN11 7.88 5.85 9.99 11.07 8.38 5.90 9.49
MAN 7.70 5.77 9.86 11.09 8.26 5.83 9.49
SEM3 0.048 0.030 0.048 0.056 0.052 0.453 0.018
P-value
Challenge 0.915 0.937 0.039 0.047 0.011 <0.001 0.847
Diet type 0.333 0.229 <0.001 <0.001 0.027 0.358 0.055
Enzyme 0.613 0.181 0.109 0.617 0.727 0.443 0.845
Challenge × diet type 0.856 0.662 0.683 0.074 0.422 0.987 0.426
Challenge × enzyme 0.098 0.942 0.605 0.165 0.381 0.524 0.421
Diet type × enzyme 0.742 0.462 0.510 0.608 0.067 0.439 0.934
Challenge × diet type × enzyme 0.660 0.332 0.290 0.560 0.782 0.540 0.998

a,b Within a column, means with no common superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).

1

Means are based on 6 replicates per treatment with 4 birds per replicate.

2

Control = no enzyme; XYN10 = xylanase from family 10; XYN11 = xylanase from family 11; MAN = β-mannanase.

3

SEM = standard error of the mean.