Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Mar 30;137:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104646

Table 1.

Reliability estimates from selected studies.

Author Year Age range (N) Variable Reliability type Statistic

Stop Signal Task
Williams 1999 9–12 (41) SSRT Split half SB2 r = .86
13–17(50) SB2 r = .91
18–29 (47) SB2 r = .91
Bedard 2002  6–82 (317) SSRT IC α = .93
Nigg 2006 12–17 (498) (two waves) SSRT IC α = .93
Meisel 2015 T1: 12.6 (373)
T2: 13.6 (370)
SSRT IC α = .70
IC α = .71
Malagoli 2018 14–19 (240) SSRT Split-half SB2 r = .85
Tiego 2020 11–12 (136) SSRT Split-half R = 0.94
Go/No-Go
Kuntsi 2005 12–13 (47) CE Test-retest of 2 weeks ICC = .70
McAuley & White 2011 6–24 (153) CE IC α = .07
Malagoli 2018 14–19 (240) CE IC α = .70
Tiego 2020 11–12 (136) CE Split-half R = 0.82
Antisaccade Task
Klein & Fischer 2005 6–18 (117) AS accuracy Test-retest of 18.9(1.2) months ICC = .68
6–88 (327) AS accuracy Odd-even R = .96
Split-half R = .87
Ordaz 2013 9–26 (123) AS latency Test-retest (∼12 months) R = .53
IC ICC = .61
AS accuracy Test-retest (∼12 months) R = .76
IC ICC = .65