Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;12:8498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12498-6

Table 1.

Results of the QLF measurements in different groups: ΔF (fluorescence loss [%]) shows avarage fluorescence loss in a lesion and is related to the loss of mineral content and to lesion depth (SD: standard deviation).

Time Group Minimum Maximum Mean SD Group comparison

ΔF

T-demin

I: SDF − 21.3 − 8.1 − 16.65 4.13 p = 0.251
II: Bifluorid 12 − 22.7 − 7.2 − 15.38 4.70
III: Cervitec F − 23.8 − 10.0 − 17.56 4.16
Negative control − 19.1 − 10.1 − 13.46 3.89
ΔF T07 I: SDF − 21.8 − 8.4 − 14.16 3.94 p = 0.075
II: Bifluorid 12 − 30.5 − 10.5 − 17.88 4.89
III: Cervitec F − 24.1 − 8.1 − 15.88 4.13
ΔF T14 I: SDF − 23.1 − 8.6 − 15.53 4.42 p = 0.060
II: Bifluorid 12 − 30.9 − 12.6 − 19.40 5.19
III: Cervitec F − 21.9 − 7.4 − 15.97 4.56
ΔF T21 I: SDF − 31.3 − 8.6 − 16.17 6.81 p = 0.131
II: Bifluorid 12 − 27.1 − 12.1 − 18.81 4.12
III: Cervitec F − 22.0 − 8.9 − 15.08 3.81
ΔF T28 I: SDF − 33.0 − 9.9 − 16.47a 6.08 p = 0.034*
II: Bifluorid 12 − 20.0 − 12.4 − 15.55a,b 2.15
III: Cervitec F − 22.9 − 6.3 − 11.71b 4.83
Negative control − 20.2 − 12.6 − 15.40a,b 3.20

*Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between the groups.