Table 8.
Ref | Nature | Solar still type | Material used | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Modi et al. (2021) | Experimental | Dual slope | 0.1% CuO concentration | Use of CuO improved the yield by 58.25% |
Kabeel et al. (2017b) | Experimental | Single slope | 10 to 40% CuO concentration | Utilizing CuO nanoparticles boosted the distillate by 16% and 25% at CuO concentration of 10% and 40%, respectively |
Gupta et al. (2016) | Experimental | Single slope | 0.12% CuO concentration | Solar still with added nanoparticles produced 3445 ml/m2 per day at water depth of 5 cm |
El-Gazar et al. (2021) | Experimental + Theoretical | Single slope | Al2O3 + CuO 0.025% for each | Enhancement in the still output yield reached 27.2% in summer and 21.7% in winter compared to reference still |
Attia et al. (2021) | Experimental | CuO-water–based nanofluid |
Daily yield reached 6.8 L/m2 with an improvement of 76.6% Water cost 0.0066 $/L |