Table 2.

Learning curves for SMR power at C3 during the resting-state

	F
	Group (p)	Time (p)	Group × Time (p)	LSD's post-hoc comparisons
C3	3.833 (0.062)	1.620 (0.160)	2.538* (0.032)	Group: Con > NF in resting 3
				Time: resting 6 > resting 1, resting 2 and resting 4 in NF

Bold number indicates repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between Group (neurofeedback group and control group) and Time (resting 1 to resting 6) on SMR power at C3

Bold words indicate a significant simple effect of Time by Group in the neurofeedback group was found. Also, the results revealed a significant simple effect of Group by Time. LSD post- hoc comparisons revealed the SMR power at C3 in resting 6 was higher than resting 1, resting2, and resting 4 of the neurofeedback group and the control group is higher than the neurofeedback group in resting 3

Con: Control Group; NF: Neurofeedback Group; *p < 0.05