Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;43(9):2727–2742. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25829

TABLE 1.

Comparison to other neuroimaging pipelines

HALFpipe C‐PAC fMRIPrep MRIQC FitLins Conn toolbox XCP toolbox DPARSF DPABI
Quality assessment Quality metrics Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Visual quality assessment Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Features Task‐based activation Yes No Yes No a Yes No
Seed‐based connectivity Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Dual regression Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
Atlas‐based connectivity matrix Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
ReHo Yes Yes No Yes b Yes Yes
fALFF Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Group statistics Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

Note: HALFpipe supports a number of different features that are also available in other pipelines such as the configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectome C‐PAC (Craddock et al., 2013), the Conn toolbox (Whitfield‐Gabrieli and Nieto‐Castanon 2012), the eXtensible Connectivity Pipeline XCP (Ciric et al. 2018) and the data processing and analysis of brain images toolbox DPABI (Yan et al. 2016). fMRIPrep (Esteban, Markiewicz, et al. 2019) in combination with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Control tool (MRIQC) (Esteban et al., 2017) and FitLins (Markiewicz et al. 2016) allows users to construct an analysis pipeline fully within the Nipype ecosystem (Esteban, Ciric, et al. 2020).

a

Task‐based connectivity is supported.

b

As implemented with LCOR (local correlation).