Table 4.
Advantages and disadvantages of different microvascular endothelial function assessment techniques
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Arterial glycocalyx |
• Tracer dilution method: direct measure • OPS + SDF: simple, non-invasive, bedside performance |
• Tracer dilution method: invasive and time-consuming • OPS + SDF: indirect measures |
| Near-infrared spectroscopy |
• Non-invasive, portable • Tissue oxygen consumption measurement • Recordings during exercise |
• Affected by adipose tissue thickness • Myoglobin may interfere |
| Laser Doppler flowmetry |
• Simple, non-invasive • Continuous blood flow measurement during exercise • Coupling with reactivity tests |
• Expensive equipment • Requires experienced operator for high accuracy and low variability over time • Susceptible to changes in autonomic nervous system and vasomotor tone • Temperature dependent |
| Laser speckle contrast analysis |
• Simple, non-invasive • Real-time recording of blood flow changes |
• Expensive equipment • Requires experienced operator for high accuracy and low variability over time • Movement artefacts • No recordings in absolute flow units |
OPS, orthogonal polarization spectral; SDF, sidestream darkfield