Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;13(2):209–235. doi: 10.1007/s13167-022-00280-7

Table 4.

Advantages and disadvantages of different microvascular endothelial function assessment techniques

Method Advantages Disadvantages
Arterial glycocalyx

• Tracer dilution method: direct measure

• OPS + SDF: simple, non-invasive, bedside performance

• Tracer dilution method: invasive and time-consuming

• OPS + SDF: indirect measures

Near-infrared spectroscopy

• Non-invasive, portable

• Tissue oxygen consumption measurement

• Recordings during exercise

• Affected by adipose tissue thickness

• Myoglobin may interfere

Laser Doppler flowmetry

• Simple, non-invasive

• Continuous blood flow measurement during exercise

• Coupling with reactivity tests

• Expensive equipment

• Requires experienced operator for high accuracy and low variability over time

• Susceptible to changes in autonomic nervous system and vasomotor tone

• Temperature dependent

Laser speckle contrast analysis

• Simple, non-invasive

• Real-time recording of blood flow changes

• Expensive equipment

• Requires experienced operator for high accuracy and low variability over time

• Movement artefacts

• No recordings in absolute flow units

OPS, orthogonal polarization spectral; SDF, sidestream darkfield