Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;23(5):e13562. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13562

TABLE 2.

Estimated uncertainty budget for W2 dose measurements. The largest source of uncertainty is associated with the detector position due to an initial dose fall‐off of approximately 10% per mm from isocenter. The uncertainty associated with the Task Group‐51 dose calibration for the linac17 is not included since it is a systematic error common to all dosimetric measurements and treatment planning calculations

Dose measurement uncertainties (k = 1) for W2 detector
Type of uncertainty Source of uncertainty Effect
Statistical Detector position ±3%
Beam output ±0.25%
Systematic Dose calibration (Eclipse TPR calculation for 4 × 4 cm2 field) ±0.5%
Measurement in solid water 27 ±1%
Total ±3.2%