Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;23(5):e13562. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13562

TABLE 5.

Critical structure dose statistics for eight trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) patients (equally split between left and right‐sided conditions) planned using the virtual cone and a physical, 5‐mm stereotactic cone. For each patient, both types of the plan were calculated using the same isocenter and the same dose prescription, 90 Gy to the maximum dose

Physical cone (5 mm, 6‐MV FFF) Maximum Minimum Mean Standard deviation Planning constraint
MU 20 668 18 927 19 771 572
Brainstem maximum dose (Gy) 24.97 23.25 24.11 0.55 <25
Brainstem D0.5cc (Gy) 5.54 4.12 4.94 0.44 <10

Brainstem D0.1cc (Gy)

10.23 8.40 9.55 0.67 <12
Brain V10Gy (cc) 1.11 0.73 0.87 0.12 <10

Optic nerve maximum dose (Gy)

0.08 0.01 0.05 0.02 <10

Inner ear maximum dose (Gy)

0.70 0.06 0.24 0.22 <12
Virtual cone (10‐MV FFF) Maximum Minimum Mean Standard deviation Planning constraint
MU 31 340 29 300 30 196 602
Brainstem maximum dose (Gy) 22.68 18.75 22.00 1.33 <25
Brainstem D0.5cc (Gy) 6.74 6.33 6.48 0.15 <10
Brainstem D0.1cc (Gy) 11.82 10.58 11.24 0.38 <12
Brain V10Gy (cc) 1.50 1.06 1.24 0.15 <10
Optic nerve maximum Dose (Gy) 1.24 0.54 0.84 0.23 <10
Inner Ear maximum Dose (Gy) 4.10 2.99 3.36 0.36 <12