Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;12(3):381–391. doi: 10.1177/2192568220952074

Table 1.

100 Top-Cited Articles on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS).

Rank First author Title Journal Total citations Year Average citation
1 Fairbank, JC The Oswestry Disability Index Spine 2162 2000 108.1
2 Chou, R Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society Annals of Internal Medicine 1590 2007 122.3
3 Deyo, RA Primary care—Low back pain New England Journal of Medicine 1037 2001 54.6
4 Roland, M The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Spine 940 2000 47
5 Deyo, RA Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association 648 2010 64.8
6 Weinstein, JN Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis New England Journal of Medicine 555 2008 46.3
7 Angst, F Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities Arthritis and Rheumatism 404 2001 21.3
8 Amundsen, T Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study Spine 366 2000 18.3
9 Jarvik, JG Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging Annals of Internal Medicine 336 2002 18.7
10 Atlas, SJ Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study Spine 327 2005 21.8
11 Delitto, A Low back pain clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 326 2012 40.8
12 Manchikanti, L Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain Pain Physician 308 2009 28
13 Malmivaara, A Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial Spine 282 2007 21.7
14 Weinstein, JN Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial Spine 253 2010 25.3
15 Zucherman, JF A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication—two-year follow-up results Spine 253 2005 16.9
16 Kalichman, L Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study Spine Journal 246 2009 22.4
17 Chou, R Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline Spine 240 2009 21.8
18 Atlas, SJ Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis - Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study Spine 234 2000 11.7
19 Friedly, J Increases in lumbosacral injections in the Medicare population—1994 to 2001 Spine 215 2007 16.5
20 Katz, JN Lumbar spinal stenosis New England Journal of Medicine 211 2008 17.6
21 Forsth, P A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis New England Journal of Medicine 210 2016 52.5
22 Ghogawala, Z Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis New England Journal of Medicine 193 2016 48.3
23 Thome, C Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy Journal of Neurosurgery–Spine 193 2005 12.9
24 Fritz, JM Subgrouping patients with low back pain: evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 192 2007 14.8
25 Angst, F Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities Journal of Rheumatology 185 2002 10.3
26 Zheng, FY Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation Spine 180 2002 10
27 Zucherman, JF A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results European Spine Journal 174 2004 10.9
28 Schizas, C Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images Spine 166 2010 16.6
29 Conn, A Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain Pain Physician 163 2009 14.8
30 Yakut, E Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain Spine 155 2004 9.7
31 Friedly, JL A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis New England Journal of Medicine 151 2014 25.2
32 Aalto, TJ Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis—systematic review Spine 143 2006 10.2
33 Pratt, RK The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 143 2002 7.9
34 Jansson, KA Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and one year after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery–British Volume 142 2009 12.9
35 Fritz, JM The use of a classification approach to identify subgroups of patients with acute low back pain - Interrater reliability and short-term treatment outcomes Spine 142 2000 7.1
36 Iguchi, T Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 141 2000 7.1
37 Manchikanti, L Comprehensive review of therapeutic interventions in managing chronic spinal pain Pain Physician 138 2009 12.5
38 Kovacs, FM Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials Spine 135 2011 15
39 Richards, JC The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication Spine 133 2005 8.9
40 Wilke, HJ Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure European Spine Journal 132 2008 11
41 Genevay, S Lumbar spinal stenosis Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology 131 2010 13.1
42 Deyo, RA Involving patients in clinical decisions—impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery Medical Care 131 2000 6.6
43 Manchikanti, L Preliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: Part 4—spinal stenosis Pain Physician 129 2008 10.8
44 Atlas, SJ Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting Journal of General Internal Medicine 129 2001 6.8
45 Kreiner, DS An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update) Spine Journal 127 2013 18.1
46 Schnake, KJ Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis Spine 126 2006 9
47 Grotle, M Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires Spine 126 2005 8.4
48 Ragab, AA Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older Spine 124 2003 7.3
49 Fritz, JM Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective Physical Therapy 123 2001 6.5
50 Sirvanci, M Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging European Spine Journal 119 2008 9.9
51 Botwin, KP Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis—an outcome study American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 118 2002 6.6
52 Botwin, KP Complications of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal lumbar epidural injections Archives of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation 118 2000 5.9
53 Sengupta, DK Degenerative spondylolisthesis—review of current trends and controversies Spine 116 2005 7.7
54 Schaeren, S Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization Spine 110 2008 9.2
55 Rosen, DS Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: Outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older Neurosurgery 107 2007 8.2
56 Whitman, JM A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - A randomized clinical trial Spine 105 2006 7.5
57 Simotas, AC Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis—clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis Spine 102 2000 5.1
58 Watters, WC Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine Journal 101 2008 8.4
59 Palmer, S Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system Journal of Neurosurgery 101 2002 5.6
60 Bae, HW Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 100 2013 14.3
61 Mannion, AF Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment European Spine Journal 99 2006 7.1
62 Koc, Z Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 95 2009 8.6
63 Ghogawala, Z Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis Journal of Neurosurgery–Spine 95 2004 5.9
64 Verhoof, OJ High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis European Spine Journal 94 2008 7.8
65 Kondrashov, DG Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 93 2006 6.6
66 Noponen-Hietala, N Sequence variations in the collagen IX and XI genes are associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 90 2003 5.3
67 Steurer, J Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 88 2011 9.8
68 Suri, P Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association 88 2010 8.8
69 Rahman, M Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 88 2008 7.3
70 Haig, AJ Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery–American Volume 87 2007 6.7
71 Manchikanti, L The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial Pain Physician 86 2009 7.8
72 Lurie, JD Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 86 2008 7.2
73 Goel, A Facetal distraction as treatment for single- and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report. Technical note Journal of Neurosurgery–Spine 85 2011 9.4
74 Ikuta, K Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note Journal of Neurosurgery–Spine 85 2005 5.7
75 Toyone, T Patients’ expectations and satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery Spine 83 2005 5.5
76 Dai, LY Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine with beta-tricalcium phosphate versus autograft - A prospective, randomized study with 3-year follow-up Spine 80 2008 6.7
77 Knutsson, B Obesity is associated with inferior results after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 79 2013 11.3
78 Parr, AT Caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain: a systematic appraisal of the literature Pain Physician 78 2012 9.8
79 Cavusoglu, H Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study European Spine Journal 78 2007 6
80 Costa, F Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression Journal of Neurosurgery–Spine 78 2007 6
81 Borenstein, DG Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain Current Opinion in Rheumatology 78 2001 4.1
82 Manchikanti, L Results of 2-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in central spinal stenosis Pain Physician 77 2012 9.6
83 Lee, JB An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients—preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 76 2004 4.8
84 Oertel, MF Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression Neurosurgery 75 2006 5.4
85 Atlas, SJ Spinal stenosis—surgical versus nonsurgical treatment Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 75 2006 5.4
86 Christie, SD Dynamic interspinous process technology Spine 75 2005 5
87 Korovessis, P Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results Spine 75 2004 4.7
88 Sanden, B Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 4555 patients from the Swedish Spine Register Spine 74 2011 8.2
89 Sobottke, R Interspinous implants (X STOPÒ, WallisÒ, DiamÒ) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? European Spine Journal 74 2009 6.7
90 Pao, JL Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis European Spine Journal 74 2009 6.7
91 de Graaf, I Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests Spine 74 2006 5.3
92 Delport, EG Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with epidural steroid injections: a retrospective outcome study Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 74 2004 4.6
93 Szpalski, M Lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: an overview European Spine Journal 74 2003 4.4
94 Fisher, MA Electrophysiology of radiculopathies Clinical Neurophysiology 74 2002 4.1
95 Siebert, E Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment Nature Reviews Neurology 73 2009 6.6
96 Siddiqui, M One-year results of X STOP interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 73 2007 5.6
97 Sengupta, DK Lumbar spinal stenosis: treatment strategies and indications for surgery Orthopedic Clinics of North America 72 2003 4.2
98 Benoist, M The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis Joint Bone Spine 72 2002 4
99 Manchikanti, L Lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, active control trial Pain Physician 71 2012 8.9
100 Podichetty, VK Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 71 2006 5.1