Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr;65(4):1491–1500. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.4.1491-1500.1999

TABLE 2.

Comparative effects of glycine betaine, ectoine, and various exogenous polysaccharides on the growth of S. meliloti 102F34 at high osmolaritiesa

Putative osmoprotectant added Growth parametersb in LAS with:
No osmoticum
0.5 M NaCl
0.8 M Mannitolc
DT (h) ODmax DT (h) ODmax DT (h) ODmax
None 4.0 2.0 20.0 1.0 18.0 0.9
Sucrose 4.0 2.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 1.8
Glycine betaine 3.9 2.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 2.1
Ectoine 4.0 1.9 7.5 1.8 9.0 1.8
Trehalose 3.9 2.1 8.0 2.0 8.5 2.1
Maltose 4.0 2.0 8.5 2.0 8.5 1.9
Cellobiose 4.2 1.9 8.0 1.9 9.3 1.8
Turanose 4.1 2.0 8.0 2.0 9.0 1.9
Gentiobiose 4.0 2.0 7.0 1.9 8.5 2.1
Palatinose 4.1 1.9 7.0 1.9 8.5 1.8
Lactosed 4.0 2.0 20.0 1.0 18.0 0.9
Thiodiglucoside 3.9 2.0 20.2 1.0 18.0 0.9
Raffinose 3.9 2.0 20.5 1.1 18.0 0.9
Maltotriose 3.9 1.8 11.0 2.0 10.5 1.9
Maltotetraose 4.0 1.9 20.0 1.1 18.0 0.9
a

Cultures were grown in LAS without or with an osmoticum (0.5 M NaCl or 0.8 M mannitol) in the presence of 1 mM of the indicated putative osmoprotectant. 

b

Growth parameters are expressed as the doubling time (DT) (in hours per generation) and the maximal optical density (ODmax), which was measured at 570 nm at stationary phase. 

c

LAS with 0.8 M mannitol is iso-osmotic with LAS plus 0.5 M NaCl [980 mosm/kg H2O (20)]. 

d

Similar results were obtained with 1 mM melibiose and lactulose.