Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2021 Jun 15;53(3):731–740. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002075

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis results.

PTSD
yes: n = 57, no: n = 60
PTNM
yes: n = 26, no: n = 91
NTNM
yes: n = 20, no: n = 97

OR [95% CI] p OR [95% CI] p OR [95% CI] p
HRR 2.13 [1.18, 3.88] .013* 1.97 [1.04, 3.74] .038* 0.86 [0.43, 1.68] .661
SCR 0.58 [0.28, 1.18] .134 0.69 [0.29, 1.64] .399 2.07 [0.87, 4.92] .098
PTNM freq. 1.70 [1.18, 2.45] .005**
NTNM freq. 1.25 [0.91, 1.71] .171

Note. The groups shown in this table represent alternate ways of dichotomizing the total sample and the PTSD and nightmare groups are not mutually exclusive. Participants who reported both frequent posttraumatic and nontraumatic nightmares were assigned to the more severe PTNM group. PTNM = at least one posttraumatic nightmare / week, NTNM = at least one nontraumatic nightmare / week, PTNM freq. = posttraumatic nightmare frequency, NTNM freq. = nontraumatic nightmare frequency, OR = odds ratios, CI = confidence intervals, HRR = heart rate mean response, SCR = skin conductance mean response.

*

= p < .05

**

= p < .01.