Skip to main content
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
. 2022 Apr 26;63(1):E174–E199. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.1.2391

A comprehensive assessment of preconception health needs and interventions regarding women of childbearing age: a systematic review

DRIEDA ZAÇE 1*, ALESSIA ORFINO 2*,, ANNA MARIAVITERITTI 3, VALERIA VERSACE 4, WALTER RICCIARDI 1,4, MARIA LUISA DI PIETRO 1
PMCID: PMC9121675  PMID: 35647378

Summary

Background

This systematic review summarizes the preconception health needs of women in childbearing age, necessary to be addressed to have an eventual safe and healthy pregnancy.

Methods

Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were searched. We excluded studies involving women with reproductive system pathologies and referring to interconceptive or pregnancy period and non-empirical or only abstract studies. Two researchers independently performed the blind screening based on titles/abstracts and full-text and the quality assessment.

Results

Four major domains resulted from the thematic analysis: knowledge, behaviors and attitudes, health status and access to healthcare services. The most examined topics were knowledge and awareness on preconception health, folic acid assumption, tobacco and alcohol consumption, physical activity and healthy diet.

Conclusions

This review could assist healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, midwives) in guiding tailored counselling to women to provide the adequate level of preconception care and act as a reference to policymakers.

Key words: Preconception health, Childbearing, Needs, Pregnancy

Introduction

Preconception health refers to a woman’s condition before she becomes pregnant. Preconception period can be defined from a biological, individual and public health point of view. From a biological perspective, it includes a critical period spanning the weeks around conception when gametes mature, fertilization occurs and the developing embryo forms. In relation to individual action, the preconception period starts whenever a woman or a couple decide they want to have a baby. From a public health perspective, the preconception period can relate to a sensitive phase in the life course, such as adolescence, when health behaviors are established, before the first pregnancy [1]. Improving preconception health and healthcare can ultimately improve pregnancy outcomes [2]. Preconception health is a broad concept including management of chronic and genetic diseases, correct nutrition, adequate consumption of folic acid, exercise, control of body weight and healthy lifestyles [3].

The first step in providing preconception care requires an understanding of women’s access to health services and their knowledge of preconception risk factors. Nevertheless, sometimes, women’s knowledge of preconception health is poor, especially in those who have never had or are not planning a pregnancy [4, 5].

In a study conducted among Swedish teenagers, participants recognized the relevance of preconception health and the importance of leading a healthy lifestyle. However, not everyone had the same level of knowledge and they had difficulty understanding some aspects of preconception health. Participants expressed the need to have more information on the topic despite having heterogeneous beliefs on the methods of providing education [6].

Women may be aware of some risk factors, such as tobacco use, alcohol, drug use and domestic abuse. Nonetheless, few women discuss preconception health with their doctor [7].

Habits of women in fertile age are of utmost importance, especially among women who are not planning a pregnancy. Such women are often very young, and the lack of preconception health knowledge can lead to negative consequences on the fetus / child’s development and health. It is reported that women with unintended pregnancies do not have insurance coverage, continue to smoke and to be exposed to physical violence [8]. Among these women, the recognition of pregnancy is delayed by 5 or more weeks after conception [9], which does not give them the opportunity to adopt adequate behaviors.

An important aspect during the preconception period is folic acid intake. Women who use folic acid are generally those who plan the pregnancy and request a preconception health visit from a doctor / gynecologist [10]. In fact, women are far from meeting the preconception recommendations of folic acid intake, especially in countries without fortification requirement [11].

A fundamental role in preconception health is played by the dietary and lifestyle habits of the woman. It is highlighted how an unhealthy lifestyle, being overweight or obese favors the development of gestational diabetes mellitus [12].

However, preconception health covers a much wider spectrum, including physical, mental, emotional, and social health and not just the abovementioned aspects. This is important to understand, since in the absence of knowledge and education, women tend to perpetuate unhealthy behaviors. Given that the preconception period presents a critical window of opportunity to improve pregnancy outcomes, starting from adolescence, it is of utmost importance for public health services to know and address all women’s preconception health needs. Hence, the aim of this review is to summarize the literature on preconception health needs in women of childbearing age. The focus is on behavior and factors affecting behavior, such as knowledge, attitude and access to care, that represent priority issues for a safe and healthy pregnancy outcome.

Methods

This systematic review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [13].

The protocol of this systematic review was registered to PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020143421.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The electronic databases of Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were searched to look for pertinent articles. A search string was built for PubMed consisting of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free text words. The Boolean operators were used to combine keywords such as “Women”; “Female” “Preconception”; “Preconceived” “Health”; “Healthcare”; “Medical”; “Medication”; “Dietary”; “Nutrition”; “Mental”; “Behavioral”; “Social”; “Physical”; “Environmental” “Need”; “Service”; “Demand”; “Requirement”; “Necessity”; “Determinant”; “Counseling”; “Utilization” “Assessment”; “Tool”; “Determination”; “Research”. Afterwards, this search string was adapted for the other electronic databases. The last search for all databases was performed on January 3d, 2021 and was restricted to articles published in English, without any further restrictions.

STUDY SELECTION AND INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA

We included studies conducted in countries in Europe, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zeeland. These areas were chosen because of their relatively homogeneous cultures and a similar vision of women and pregnancy. The criteria for inclusion focused on women’s prevention behaviors and factors influencing those behaviors, such as knowledge, attitudes and access to care. We excluded studies involving women with pathologies directly associated to the reproductive system, as well as studies referring to pregnancy and interconceptive period. Genetic screening prior to conceiving to reduce the possibility of genetic disorders goes beyond the scope of this paper. When studies included both pregnant and non-pregnant women, we presented information only for the latter. Furthermore, we excluded non-empirical studies, conference abstracts, book reviews and abstracts not accompanied by a full text. All studies retrieved from the search strategy were imported to Rayyan [61] and duplicates were removed. Four researchers (AO, AMV, DZ, VV) independently performed the first screening based on titles and abstracts. In a second step, studies with full texts available were carefully reviewed by four researchers (AO, AM, DZ, VV) and disagreements were resolved by consensus. The reference lists of the included studies were hand searched to look for additional articles.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction was performed by two researchers (AO and DZ). A dedicated data extraction form was used retrieving the following information for each eligible study: (1) Study identification: first author, title, publication year; (2) Study characteristics: country, design, objective, tool used to collect information; (3) Population characteristics: sample, women’s age, education level, ethnicity, setting; (4) The domain being assessed, i.e. knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, health status and access to healthcare services; (5) The specific healthcare need assessed.

Thematic analysis of each preconception health need was conducted, grouping them into four major domains: knowledge, behaviours and attitudes, health status and access to healthcare services, reporting the main findings associated to them.

QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Two researchers assessed the quality of all included studies. Based on the study design, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies (CASP Qualitative Checklist, 2018), ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials [14], Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials (RCT) [15] and Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group (NIH, 2014) were used. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for cohort and case-control studies [16] and an adapted version of this scale for cross sectional studies [17].

Results

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INCLUDED STUDIES

Our search strategy produced a total of 6749 articles. After the screening process 48 studies were included in the review (Fig. 1, Supplementary Tab. I.)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Flow chart: screening process of the included studies.

Supplemental Tab. I.

Article Study design Used scale Overall quality (% satisfied items)
Andreoli et al., 2019 [31] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Azofeifa, 2014 [53] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Batra et al., 2018 [57] RCT Jadad-RCT 80%
Bello et al., 2013 [8] Qualitative study CASP-Qualitative studies 90%
Bello, 2018 [35] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Bickmore et al., 2019 [59] RCT Jadad-RCT 60%
Bromwich et al., 2020 [44] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Carmichael et al., 2019 [42] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 46.10%
Cuervo, 2014 [38] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Daw et al., 2020 [56] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
DeJoy et al., 2014 [58] Pre-post study BAQA-Pre-post studies 42%
Denny, 2012 [46] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Dunlop et al., 2013 [23] Non randomised interventional study ROBINS-INRC studies 50%
Flores et al., 2017 [29] Pre-post study BAQA-Pre-post studies 83%
Frey, 2004 [7] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 40%
Głąbska, 2016 [62] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 50%
Harelick, 2009 [22] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 50%
Hawks, 2011 [55] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Hillemeier, 2008 [24] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Hillemeier et al., 2008 [5] RCT Jadad-RCT 60%
Hilton, 2001 [27] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 20%
Kvach et al., 2018 [30] Pre-post study BAQA-Pre-post studies 67%
Lammers, 2010 [32] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Margerison et al., 2020 [63] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 46.10%
Moniek Looman et al., 2019 [49] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 38.40%
Montanaro et al., 2019 [25] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Murugesu et al., 2019 [33] Qualitative study CASP-Qualitative studies 88%
Naimi et al., 2002 [9] Case-control study NOS-CC, Cohort 46.10%
Nilsen et al., 2019 [48] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 80%
Nilsen, 2016 [10] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Nowicki, 2018 [39] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 70%
Panchal et al., 2019 [52] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Quillin et al., 2000 [28] Pre-post study BAQA-Pre-post studies 50%
Ragnaret al., 2018 [20] Qualitative study CASP-Qualitative studies 90%
Richards et al., 2012 [21] Non randomised interventional study ROBINS-I-NRC studies 32%
Richards et al., 2012 [21] RCT Jadad-RCT 20%
Schoenaker et al., 2015 [12] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 61.30%
Short et al., 2020 [43] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 80%
Sijpkens et al., 2019 [34] Interventional study Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group. 58%
Sijpkens et al., 2021 [47] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 38.40%
Skogsdal et al., 2019 [26] RCT Jadad-RCT 60%
Srinivasulu et al., 2019 [51] Interventional study Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group. 66.60%
Stulberg et al., 2019 [54] Pre-post study BAQA-Pre-post studies 75%
Vamos, 2015 [37] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Walker et al., 2021 [18] Qualitative study CASP-Qualitative studies 77%
Whitaker et al., 2018 [36] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 61.30%
Witt et al., 2016 [41] Cohort study NOS-CC, Cohort 69,20%
Xaverius, 2009 [3] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%
Xaverius, 2012 [40] Cross-sectional study NOS adapted by Herzog et al. 60%

Among the selected studies, 22/48 were cross-sectional, 4/48 were randomized clinical trials, 7/48 were cohort studies, 3/48 were qualitative, 5/48 were pre-post studies, 2/48 were non-randomized clinical trial, 1/48 case-control studies and 4/48 were non randomized interventional study. Most of the studies were conducted in the USA (33/48), 2/48 in Poland, 2 in Italy, 2/48 in Sweden, 3/48 in Australia, 3/48 in Netherland 1/48 in Spain, 1/48 in Norway and 1/48 in Canada. Study sample of selected articles is represented by women of childbearing age between 16 and 44 years old, students and workers, of various ethnicities and social backgrounds and with different levels of education. The smallest sample enrolled 14 participants [18], and the largest 58,365 participants [19].

Results of the quality assessment reported that 23% of the studies satisfied more than 75% of the items on the rating scales and 64% of the studies satisfied between 50 and 75% of the items on the rating scales. The rest satisfied less than 50% of the items in the quality assessment scale (Supplementary Tab. II).

Supplemental Tab. II.

First Author, Year Country Design Sample size Women’s age (years) Setting/source Duration Intervention TOOLS (test/scores/questionnaire) Type of need assessed Main results
Andreoli et al., 2019 [31] Italy Cross-sectional 398 (249 Connective Tissues Diseases, 149 Chronic Arthritis) 39.8 ± 9.21 Hospital centres NA NA Self-reported questionnaire, comprising 65 multiple-choice and 12 open-answer questions Knowledge Nearly one third of patients declared not to have received any counselling about either pregnancy desire nor contraception. The average Disease Knowledge Index (DKI) Score for the patients who received counselling was higher than that of patients who did not receive it: 0.61 versus 0.52 for CTD (p = 0.09) and 0.55 versus 0.44 for CA (P = 0.01). Italian women of childbearing age affected by RD reported several unmet needs in their knowledge about reproductive issues.
Azofeifa et al., 2014 [53] USA Cross-sectional 3,971 nonpregnant 15-44 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). 1999-2004 NA Questionnaire Behaviours/Health status/Oral health The percentage of women who reported having very good or good oral health was significantly higher among younger nonpregnant women (75.3 vs 67.0%, p = 0 .003). Non pregnant and non-Hispanic white woman (74%) with a high level of education (79%) and high socio-economic level (81%) reported having very good or good mouth and teeth condition and having a dental visit in the previous year. A higher percentage of nonpregnant women with family income greater than 200% of the FPL reported having a dental visit in the previous year compared with nonpregnant women with lower incomes (74.1 vs 52.9% for those with < 100% FPL and 74.1 vs 51.4%, for those with 100-199% FPL; P < .001 for both).
Batra et al., 2018[57] USA Cluster RCT 292 18-45 Urban academic medical center September 2015 - May 2016 Educational intervention Questionnaire. MyFamilyPlan module online Behaviours, access to healthcare Participants completing the MyFamilyPlan health education module prior to a well-woman visit were significantly more likely (OR = 1.97; CI 1.22-3.19) to report that study participation led them to discuss reproductive health with their physicians. Exposure to MyFamilyPlan did not have an impact on folic acid use, contraceptive method initiation/change self-efficacy score.
Bello et al., 2018 [35] USA Cross -sectional 5704 18-45 National Eating Trends (NET)® Survey 2003-2011 NA Daily diary (recordings food and beverage)Self-reported height and weight, chronic illnesses, and exercise habits Behaviours, health status 25.5% of women were overweight and 30.7% were obese. Women of reproductive age exercised a mean of 3 days per week and consumed fruits/vegetables 9.7 times, sugar-sweetened beverages 10.7 times, and concentrated sweets 8.5 times during a 2-week period. Across BMI categories, exercise (79.2%) and eating fruits/vegetables (96,1%) were significantly associated with healthy weight Reporting any exercise or fruit/vegetable consumption was associated with decreased odds of overweight or obesity (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.83 and aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, respectively).
Bello et al., 2013 [8] USA Qualitative 22 18-44 Community primary care health center for low-income African-American population July - October2012. Reproductive health self-assessment tool (RH- SAT) Semi-structured interviews Knowledge, behaviours RH-SAT provides new information women had not previously considered about preconception health and reproductive goals. Most patients said they would feel comfortable bringing up contraception, preconception health, and their reproductive goals with their primary provider. RH-SAT could increase patient awareness and participation in discussion of these topics. Patients find reproductive goals assessment to be important and relevant to their care, but have limited knowledge.
Bickmore et al., 2020 [59] USA Randomized controlled trial 262 18-34 Web-based 12 months Use of Gabby Preconception Care Conversational (PCC) intervention, a Web-based virtual animated health counsellor, to screen women on 108 preconception care risks and address them The “Gabby” PCC agent; Six single-item scale questions to assess participants’ satisfaction with the virtual counselor Behaviours; knowledge At the end of the year, almost all (96.4%) indicated they had either acted on recommendations made by the agent or planned to. Most (75.0%) said they would recommend the system to someone they knew. There were no significant differences between the two age groups on intervention use or satisfaction. No significant differences across usage patterns for participants based on education, employment, computer literacy or health literacy.
Bromwich et al., 2020 [44] USA Cross-sectional 1683 mean 26.92 Reproductive health and maternity services centers 2014-2017 Telephone survey Questionnaire on: 1) demographics (age, income, education, etnicity); 2) marijuana use (before pregnancy, frequency, method, and mode of use; 3) tobacco use; 4) alchol use Behaviours 25.1% of respondents reported using marijuana during preconception. Marijuana users were younger, poorer, and less educated than non-users (p < 0.001) and more likely to report alcohol use and mental illness (ps < 0.001). Prepregnancy marijuana users, vs tobacco users, were more likely (< 0.001) to: have low education (73 vs 66%), have low income (76 vs 66%), have menthal health disorders (11,1 vs 7,1%).
Carmichael et al., 2019 [42] USA Cohort 11 109 All National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997-2011 NA Diet Quality Index Behoviours/Healthy lifestyle/Diet 5.1% of women were Underweight, 51.4% had a normal weight, 21.9% were overweight and 17.5% obese. Folic acid 3 months before pregnancy No: 7042 (63.4%) Yes 3934 (35.4%). Smoked cigarettes 1 month before pregnancy No 9106 (82.0%) Yes 1965 (17.7%). Participants who were aged < 0, were nulliparous, had < high school diploma or < $20 000 annual household income, were non-Hispanic black, were underweight or obese, did not intend to become pregnant, did not take folic acid-containing vitamin supplements, or smoked had worse dietary intakes than their reference groups.
Cuervo et al., 2014 [38] Spain Cross-sectional 4471 20-45 2794 pharmacies, in urban and rural areas November 2009 - March 2010 Nutritional educational intervention Face-to-face interview Behaviours/ Health status Only 48.9% of women were consuming folic acid (supplements or enriched food) and 14.1% multivitamins. Self-perception of health: good 66%; Self-perception of actual nutrition: very balanced 44%; tobacco: never 56,3% smoker 20,1%; alchool yes 49%; illecit drugs 1,5% actual use; Diet supplementation: Enriched milk with calcium/vitamins 21.1% Folic acid/vitamin B12 48.9% Iodine/Iodine salt 26.1% Iron 16.0% Multivitamin and minerals 14.1%; Women in preconception period did not reach the recommendation for consumption in the following food groups: proteins, cereals, salad vegetables.
Daw et al., 2020 [56] USA Cross-sectional 10792 19-35 Pregnancy Risk Surveillanceand Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2015-2017 NA Standardized mail and telephone survey, including demographic characteristics, insurance status, health care utiliza-tion, and health outcomes Access to healthcare Rate of preconception uninsurance: 9.4% (95% CI 9.0-9.8) among white non-Hispanic women. among black non-Hispanic (12.8%, 95% CI 12.0-13.7), Hispanic English-speaking (22.3%, 95% CI 20.6-24.1), Hispanic Spanish-speaking (55.1%,95% CI 53.0-57.1), and indigenous women (23.7%, 95% CI 21.3-26.2). In adjusted models, lower income Hispanic women and indigenous women had a significantly higher predicted probability of uninsurance in the preconception and postpartum period compared with white non-Hispanic women.
DeJoy, 2014 [58] USA Pre-post study 20 20-25 Public liberal arts college 4 weeks Educational intervention. 6-item index measuring preconception health knowledge 3-item index on knowledge of midwifery care; a 3-item index on knowledge of the complications of cesarean birth and preterm birth; an 8-item index measuring self-reported preconception health behaviors, (multivitamin supplementation, alcohol use, exercise frequency, fruit and vegetable consumption, immunizations, contraception use, screening for HIV screening for other STIs) Knowledge, Behaviours After the intervention 75% of students replied that preconception health was important to them “a lot,” and the remaining students stating it was “somewhat (35%). On the post-test,75% of participants expressed a preference for midwifery care in future pregnancies. Half of participants responded that they had heard the term preconception health prior to the program, whereas 35% stated they had not and 15%were unsure. Program participants gained increased knowledge about all the covered topics but did not demonstrate a statistically significant change in the self-reported preconception health behaviour index (0.4 of 8 possible points; 95% CI, −0.4 to 1.3).
Denny et al, 2012 [46] USA Cohort study 54,612 18-44 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 1991-1992 / 2000-2001 NA BRFSS questionnaires Behaviours/ Health status Five risk factors examined: drinking, cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes, and frequent mental distress Multiple risk factors 18.7%, one risk factor 33.3%, no risk factors 48.0%. The most prevalent co-occurring risk factors was at-risk drinking and smoking (5.7%). Obesity (23.4%) was the most common and diabetes the least (5.8%). The most common combinations of risk factors were smoking, obesity, and frequent mental distress (24.3%, 95% CI 21.2-27.7).American Indian and Alaska Native women were almost 50% more likely to have multiple risk factors than white women. Women with less than a high school education were three times more likely to have multiple risk factors than women with at least a college education.
Dunlop et al, 2013 [23] USA Non randomised interventional study 600 18-40 Five publicly funded primary care clinics of low-income, nonpregnant African-American and Hispanic women 12 months Targeted brief counselling (counselling + brochures). After 3-6 months women were contacted by telephone 12 item knowledge questionnaire. Reproductive and Preconception Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire Knowledge For women in the intervention cohort, there was a significant increase in knowledge related to the importance of screening for sexually transmitted infections (+12%) in the preconception period; they experienced a significant increase in knowledge related to the preconception period as the best time to seek an appointment to discuss reproductive health with a provider (+24%), to control chronic conditions (+19%),and to discuss medications with a provider(+20%). Among women with chronic medical conditions, those in the intervention cohort significantly increased their knowledge that the condition could lead to problems in pregnancy (þ43%) relative to the lesser improvement in knowledge observed for those in the comparison cohort (þ4%) (p=0.05).
Flores et al, 2017 [29] USA Pre-post study 1.446 18-45 Churches, community centers, targeted health fairs, and other locations that offer community services. 4 months follow up Educational intervention + a 90-day supply of multivitamins Pre and post intervention questionnaire Knowledge/Awareness/ Folic acid Folic acid supplement consumption and knowledge about the benefits of folic acid increased dramatically by the end of the study, after the educational intervention (p<0.0001). The number of participants who reported taking vitamins every day increased (pre-test: n=329, 23%, post-test: n=888, 62%)(p<0.0001).
Frey, Files, 2006 [7] USA Cross-sectional 499 18-45 Primary care services August 2004 and July 2005 NA Four-page questionnaire Knowledge/awareness 98.6% realized the importance of optimizing their health prior to a pregnancy, and realized the best time to receive information about preconception health is before conception. 95.3% preferred to receive information about preconception health from their primary care physician. Only 39% of women could recall their physician ever discussing this topic. Awareness of certain risk factors that are potentially affecting a pregnancy, such as tobacco (98%), alcohol (95,8%), drug use (98,8%), and domestic abuse (97,7%). Other risks: consumption of fish (54%), exposure to cat litter (64,4%), folic acid use (79,6%), medication use (97,4%), impact of genetic history (84,1%), infectious disease (89,3%)”
Glabska et al, 2017 [62] Poland Cross-sectional 95 20–30 NA August-December 2016 NA Folate-Intake Calculation-Food Frequency Questionnaire (Fol-IC-FFQ). 3-Day Dietary Record Behaviours Adequate intake of folic acid with diet varies 15-27%. The Fol-IC-FFQ may be a valid tool for the assessment of folate intake in young women.
Harelick et al, 2011 [22] USA Crossc-sectional 340 18-44 Two community health centers 4 weeks NA Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait: 2007, Baseline Survey Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Phase 5 Knowledge/ Behaviours 70% of women reported that taking folic acid was beneficial, and 92% knew that smoking had a harmful effect. Healthcare provider’s recommendations were correlated with an HIV test (chi2=24.2; p < .001) and using birth control (chi2=7.6; p < .05). Multivitamin use, drinking alcohol, and smoking were not influenced by the provider’s recommendation. Correlation between presence of risk factors and respondent’s knowledge existed for immunizations (chi2=9.6; p < .05), but not for multivitamin use, drinking alcohol, or smoking.
Hawks et al, 2018 [55] USA Cross-sectional 3929 18-40 New York City Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2009-2011 NA Preconception Health Score (PHS), including healthcare worker visit, cleaning teeth, taking prenatal (folic acid containing) vitamins 3 or more times per week, access to family planning and/or birth control, drinking, smoking, BMI, physical exercise, planning for and /or trying to get pregnant, preconception visit in the last year Access to healthcare/Health Insurance Having health insurance during the pre-pregnancy period is associated with greater health among white women, but not among black or Hispanic women in New York City.
Hillemeier et al, 2008 [5] USA RCT 362 18−35 Low-income local rural communities 14 weeks Educational intervention Questionnaire, anthropometric measures, and biomarkers Knowledge, Behaviours Women in the intervention group had higher:
  • self-efficacy for eating healthy food (OR=1,75; p=0,008) and to perceive higher preconception control of birth outcomes (OR=1,916; p=0.031);

  • intent to eat healthy foods and be more physically active (OR=2,185; p<0.001);

  • frequency of reading food labels (OR=2,264; p=0.001), physical activity consistent with recommended levels (OR=1,867; p=0.019), and daily use of a multivitamin with folic acid (OR=6,595; p<0.001).

Hillemeier et al, 2008 [24] USA Cross-sectional 1325 18–45 Rural region in Central Pennsylvania 2002 NA Population-based telephone survey. Five indicators of health services use 1. receipt of a regular physical exam, 2.obstetrician–gynecologist [ob/gyn] visit, 3.receipt of a set of recommended screening services, 4.receipt of health counseling services on general health topics 5.receipt of pregnancy-related counseling Access to healthcare 50% at risk of pregnancy report receiving counselling about pregnancy planning in the past year. 33% of women did not receive routine physical examinations and screening services, and over half received little or no health counselling. Having had an ob/gyn visit in the past 2 years was negatively associated with two measures of need: cardiovascular risk and lower self-rated health status. Positive health behaviour was positively associated with reported receipt of recommended screening services.
Hilton, 2002 [27] USA Cross-sectional 42 18−24 Small private college NA NA Questionnaire assessing diet, folic acid intake and knowledge,, socio economic and demographic variables. Knowledge/Behaviours Young women ages 18−24 often have poor dietary habits and inadequate folic acid intake. Only 33.3% reported taking daily multivitamins.
Kvach et al, 2018 [30] USA Pre-post study 1.677 12-45 A teaching health center in Denver, Colorado. April 2015February 2016 Educational intervention Routine Pregnancy Intention (PI) Screening Knowledge/Behaviours/ Access to healthcare Addressing of unmet preconception health needs (prenatal vitamins, preconception counselling, addressing chronic conditions, use of contraception) increased from 47%-48% in April to 66%- 67% in July after the educational intervention
Lammers et al, 2017 [32] USA Cross-sectional 868 18–45 Network of offices providing community health services 9 months NA Questionnaire ex novo Knowledge/ Access to healthcare The prevalence of healthcare providers’ preconception healthcare (PCHC) conversations was 53.9%. Significant predictors of PCHC conversation were race (Native American 76% greater than White), health care provider type (non-physician 63% greater than physician), visits to a health care provider (3+ times 32% greater than 1–2 times), and pregnancy planning (considering in next 1–5years 51% greater than no plans). Significant predictors of PCHC interventions received in the past 12 months were race (Native American 22% greater than White), PCHC conversation with a health care provider (yes 52% lower than no), reporting PCHC as beneficial (yes 32% greater than don’t know), and visits to a health care provider in the past year (3+ times 90% greater than 1–2 times).
Margerison et al, 2020 [63] USA Cohort 58,365 18-44 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2018-2019 Compare the change from pre- to post-Medicaid expansion in prevalence of self-reported outcomes in low-income women Self-reported questionnaire Access to healthcare Expanded Medicaid eligibility was associated with increased healthcare coverage and utilization, better self-rated health, and decreases in avoidance of care because of cost, heavy drinking, and binge drinking. Medicaid eligibility did not impact diagnoses of chronic conditions, smoking cessation, or BMI
Moniek Looman et al, 2019 [49] Australia Cohort 277 mean 27 Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health 12 years (2003–2015) Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies; self-report questionnarie Behaviours High prevalence of inadequate dietary micronutrient intake was observed for calcium (47.9%), folate (80.8%), magnesium (52.5%), potassium (63.8%) and vitamin E (78.6%). Inadequate intakes of individual micronutrients were not associated with risk of developing GDM. Women in the highest quartile of the Micronutrient Adequacy Ratio had a 39% lower risk of developing GDM compared to women in the lowest quartile (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.86, p=0.01).
Montanaro et al, 2019 [25] Canada Cross-sectional 300 15-49 Seven primary care sites 2016 1) implementation of a Risk Assessment (RA) digital tool 2) discussing results with Healthcre Providers in scheduled meetings; 3)customized handout generated and printed in the primary care sites. 4)One-week and two-month online follow-up surveys “Risk assesment tool (RA): Body mass index; Genetic/family history; Immunizations; Infectious diseases; Medical history; Medication exposures; Mental health history; Nutrition; Oral health; Physical activity; Knowledge/behaviours The RA screened for 34 PCH risk factors. The number of risks identified per participant ranged from 4 to 24, averaging 15. The majority reported a positive experience using the RA and would recommend the intervention. Most prevalent risk factors identified: consumption of unsafe foods and caffeine (98%), stress in the past year (92%), consumption of alcohol in the past year (89%), and immunizations not up-to-date (87%);
Murugesu et al, 2019 [33] The Netherlands Qualitative 139 18-42 General practices, mother and child healthcare centers and youth healthcare centers in low SES neighborhoods NA In a problem analysis (stage 1) structured interviews were used to assess comprehension of the initial invitations sent to women for preconception care, perception of perinatal risks, attitude and intention to participate in preconception counseling. Feedback was used to adapt the invitation. Interviews, telephone interviews, pre-test, post-test, Short Assessment of Health Literacy in Dutch (SAHL-D) Knowledge Women in stage 3 (who read the adapted flyer) had a more positive attitude towards participation in preconception counselling and a better understanding of how to apply for a consultation than women in stage 1 (who read the initial invitations). No differences were found in intention to participate in preconception counseling and risk perception. Systematic adaptation of written invitations can improve the recruitment of low health-literate women for preconception counselling.
Naimi et al, 2003 [9] USA. Case-control study. 72907 Mean age: 26 Population-based mail and telephone survey. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 1996/1999 NA Population-based mail and telephone survey. Behaviours, Access to healthcare In preconception period, women with unintended pregnancies were more likely to lack health insurance (51,7%), smoke (29,8%), and be exposed to physical violence and have delayed pregnancy recognition (57.7%) Women with unintended pregnancies were significantly more likely to report binge drinking in the preconception period compared with women with intended pregnancies (16.3% vs 11.9%;
Nilsen et al, 2016 [10] Italy Cross-sectional 2.189 15-50 Data from seven maternity clinics located in six Italian regions January- June, 2012. NA Questionnaire Behaviours/ Access to healthcare 23.5 % of the participants used folic acid. Of these, 93 % had taken folic acid supplements on a daily basis.. Women who both had intended their pregnancy and had requested a preconception health visit to a doctor/gynecologist were more likely to initiate folic acid supplementation before their pregnancy (48.6 vs 4.8 %). Preconception folic acid use was also associated with higher maternal age (28% in 35-39 yeaars old women), higher education (31% of university graduated women), marriage /cohabitation (24%).Women who did not plan their pregnancy had a prevalence of 21,4% of preconception folic acid use.
Nilsen et al, 2019 [48] Norway Cross-sectional 1,055,886 (202,234 and 7,965 were 1st and 2nd generation immigrant women,respectively) mean 27-30 Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) andStatistics Norway (SSB) 1999-2016 NA Medical Birth Registry of Norway Behaviours Folic acid supplement use: non immigrant women 29.2%; 1st generaition 25.5%; second generation (21.2%). Folic acid supplement use increased with increasing length of residence in immigrant women from most countries, but the overall prevalence was lower compared with Norwegian-born women even after 20 years of residence (AOR=0.63; 95% CI:0.60–0.67).
Nowicki et al, 2018 [39] Poland Cross-sectional 182 NR Two-way paper and pencil interview (PAPI) and computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI). September 2013-May 2014. NA Paper and pencil interview (PAPI) and computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI). Health Behaviour Inventory (HBI): 1.Dietary habits; 2. Prophilactics; 3.medical examination and information 4.health practices (sleep, exercise, monitoring of body weight or past times 5. positive mental attitude (avoidance of excessively strong emotions, stress, depressive situation), Personal Value List: valuie attributed to health, symbols of happiness. Behaviours, Health status Social support HBI = 82.44 (SD = 11.80) (max=140). Healthy eating habits 3.53 (0.75) (max=5). Prophylactic Behaviors 3.43 (0.67) (max=5). Positive Mental Attitude 3.38 (0.69) (max=5). Health Practices 3.40 (0.57) (max=5). Reasons for not having children: No employment, low income, little social support.
Panchal et al, 2019 [52] USA Cross-sectional retrospective 3956 13-45 Ambulatory care family medicine residency program practices January, 2015-December, 2015 NA Clinical charts (reviewed for medication use and forms of birth control) Health behaviour/Medication use/Contraceptive use In a family medicine setting, 25% of women of childbearing age were prescribed at least one high-risk medication with over half not having evidence of contraception management.
Women less than 25 years had decreased odds of receiving contraception when prescribed a teratogenic medication (AOR= 0.47; 95%CI, 0.34–0.66).
Quillin et al, 2000 [28] USA Pre-post study 71 17-50 years College, participate in psychology groups. NA Educational intervention on neural tube problems and prevention through folic acid. Health Belief Model (HBM) and the Fetal Health Locus of Control Scale (FHLCS) Knowledge/Awareness/Behaviours Following the intervention, a significant increase in knowledge of both folic acid (p = 0.0001) and of NTDs was found (p = 0.0002), and there was a significant increase in scores for the perceived benefits factor (p = 0.0001 ), for the perceived barriers factor (p = 0.0001), and for the perceived threat factor (p = 0.0001).Awareness of folic acid was not associated with multivitamin consumption.
Ragnar et al, 2018 [20] Sweden Qualitative 47 16–18 Upper secondary school, 2015-2016 NA Focus group interviews Knowledge Participants recognised the importance of preconception health and were highly aware of the importance of a healthy lifestyle. They had difficulties relating to fertility and preconception health on a personal and behavioural level. Participants wanted more information but had heterogeneous beliefs about when, where and how this information should be given. Gender roles influence beliefs about fertility and preconception health.
Richards et al, 2012 [21] USA Non randomisedinterventional study 77 11-14 Residential summer program for American Indians high school students. 6 weeks. Educational interventions on youth population. Questionnaire. Lesson. Knowledge, Behaviours The intervention group scored higher than the non-intervention group in overall preconception health knowledge (96% vs. 90%, p = 0.03) and obesity knowledge (44% vs. 33%, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in T2 scores between the intervention and non-intervention groups on knowledge of alcohol (87% vs. 81%, p = 0.33, smoking (76% vs. 67%, p = 0.35), diabetes(72% vs. 63%, p = 0.34, or use of condoms (78% vs. 74%, p =0.12).
Schoenaker et al, 2015 [12] Australia Cohort study. 3,853 Mean 28 (1.4) Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). 2003/2012 NA Survey Behaviours/Diet/Health status No associations were found for the ‘Fruit and low-fat dairy’ and ‘Cooked vegetables’patterns and GDM. The ‘Meats, snacks and sweets’ pattern was associated with higher GDM risk after adjustment for socioeconomic, reproductive and lifestyle factors (RR=1.38 [CI 1.02, 1.86]). In stratified analysis, the ‘Meats, snacks and sweets’ pattern was associated with significantly higher GDM risk in parous and obese women, and in women with lower educational qualifications. The ‘Mediterranean-style’ pattern was associated with lower GDM risk in the fully adjusted model (0.85 [0.76, 0.98]).
Short et al, 2020 [43] USA Cross-sectional retrospective NR NR Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data from 6 states. 2016 NA Questionnaire Behaviours/marijuana use 8% of respondents reported that they had used marijuana in the month before pregnancy. Marital status, education level, parity, and living in a state with medical or recreational marijuana legalization or decriminalization remained independently associated with marijuana use. Those who reported marijuana use were 3−5 times more likely to also report symptoms of depression and tobacco and alcohol use before or during pregnancy than respondents who did not report marijuana use.
Sijpkens et al, 2019 [34] The Netherlands Interventional study 587 18-41 Primary care practices within Health Pregnancy 4 All program. Ten Dutch municipalities in deprived neighbourhoods. Target population: 165,615 women February 2013-December 2014 Four approaches: (1) letters from municipal health services; (2) letters from general practitioners; (3) information leaflets by preventive child healthcare services and (4) encouragement by peer health educators. Questionnaires Knowledge/Access to healthcare The majority of applications (n = 424; 72%) were prompted by the invitation letters (132,129) from the municipalities and general practitioners. The effect of the municipal letter seemed to fade out after 3 months. The outreach strategy led to women with different socioeconomic backgrounds and different motivations applying for a PCC consultation.
Sijpkens et al, 2021 [47] Netherlands Prospective cohort 259 18-41 14 deprived municipalities selected based on their relatively high perinatal morbidity and mortality rates 3 months 2 individual visits by a general practitioner or a midwife. 1.Risk assessment and advice according to the national guideline. 2.Iidentified risk factors and formulated plan were evaluated. Self-reported and biomarker data on behavioral changes were obtained at baseline and 3 months later. Web-based questionnaire (including the domains lifestyle, medical, reproductive, and family history) Behaviours/Lifestyle Considering the risk factors no folic acid supplementation, smoking, and alcohol consumption, 15.8% had no risk factor, 55.6% had 1 risk factors, 25.7% had 2 risk factors, and 2.9% had 3 risk factors.
Baseline self-reported prevalence of no folic acid use was 36%, smoking 12%, weekly alcohol use 22%, and binge drinking 17%. 42.1% of women who reported not taking folic acid at baseline had started taking folic acid at the follow-up measurement (p <0 .001). The percentages of smoking showed no change between baseline and follow-up. Prevalence of reported binge drinking decreased significantly (p=0.007).
Skogsdal et al, 2019 [26] Sweden Randomized controlled trial 1,946 women Q1 and 1,198 Q2 20-40 28 outpatient clinics February 2015- March 2016 1.routine contraceptive counseling. 2.general information about preconception health. 3. folic acid supplementation. 4.information about fertility and age. Two questionnaires: at baseline (Q1) and at follow-up (Q2) Knowledge/ Awareness Knowledge about fertility was low. After the intervention a larger proportion of women in the intervention group thought that it was more important to make lifestyle changes before a pregnancy. The intervention had great influence on if and when they will become pregnant. They also increased their awareness of factors affecting preconception health, such as to stop using tobacco, to refrain from alcohol, to be of normal weight, and to start with folic acid before a pregnancy. 76% stated that the Reproductive Life Plan Counselling should be part of the routine during visits to midwives or other healthcare providers.
Srinivasulu et al, 2020 [51] USA Interventional study 27,817 13–44 Institute for Family Health March 2017-September 2018 Electronic medical record-based clinical decision support designed to increase family planning services for women of reproductive age Clinical decision support tool Behaviours/ Family planning and contraception Unadjusted documentation of family planning services increased by 2.7 percentage points (55.7% pre-intervention to 58.4% intervention). In the adjusted analysis, documentation increased by 3.4 percentage points (95% CI: 2.24, 4.63). Modification of effect by race, insurance, and site were substantial, but not by age group nor ethnicity. Additionally, patient-level subset analysis showed that those exposed to the intervention had 1.26 times the odds of having family planning services documented after implementation compared to controls (95% CI: 1.17-1.36).
Stulberg et al, 2019 [54] USA Pre-post (pilot) study 63 18-49 Urban community health center NR Implementation in the Electronic Medical Record of One Key Question®, (would you like to become pregnant in the next year) 2.Provided a brief training to primary care clinicians on reproductive life plan assessment, preconception counseling, and contraception Electronic Medical Records/Questionnaire Access to healthcare/Counselling Higher rates of clinician counseling women about contraception (52% vs. 76%, p = 0.040) and recommending a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (10% vs. 32%, p = 0.035). There were no significant changes in preconception counseling.
Vamos et al, 2015 [37] USA Cross -sectional 7,596 18-28 80 high schools 1994-2008 NA Questionnaire +interview Behaviours Older females were less likely to be physically active (OR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.91–0.97). Population density was positively associated with more than 5 instances of Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) among women (OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.02–1.77). Median household income was also positively associated with MVPA in those women (OR 1.33 95 % CI 1.06–1.66). A significant inverse trend was found between high MVPA and proportion of the community without a high school diploma.
Walker et al, 2021 [18] Australia Qualitative 14 24-41 Community setting September-December 2019. NA Interviews comprised open-ended questions to elicit their views and expectations of preconception care Knowledgw/behaviours
  • Identified nutrition, physical activity and looking after their mental health as being the most important lifestyle factors for preconception health.

  • Most women reported that seeking preconception care was not relevant to them if they were not planning a pregnancy.

  • Only a few women could describe their experiences seeking preconception care.

  • Best place to provide preconception advice: health professional with some sort of qualification.

  • Women reported wanting more information about preconception health earlier in their reproductive years. Schools and public health campaigns were identified as methods of achieving greater awareness.

Whitaker et al, 2018 [36] USA Cohort study 1333 20-35 Four field centers 1987-2010 NA Questionnaire Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Behaviours Women who developed GDM were more likely to have a family history of diabetes (21,3% p:0,017), higher prepregnancy BMI (22,9% p:0,011) and waist circumference (70% p:0,010), and lower levels of fitness compared with those without GDM. Women with GDM also had worse cardiometabolic profiles, including elevated fasting glucose (70% p:0,010), insulin (80% p:0.005), and HOMA-IR levels and lower HDL levels (11,1% p:0,033).
Witt et al, 2016 [41] USA Cohort study 9,350 20-40 Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort 2001 NA Birth certificate; self-report questionnaire about tobacco, alcohol, stressful events, prenatal health and stress, Behaviours/Health status 34.8% and 3.3% of women reported alcohol use during the three months prior to pregnancy and in the final three months of their pregnancies, respectively. 12.3% and 11.0% of women reported tobacco use during the three months prior to pregnancy and in the final three months of pregnancy, respectively. Compared to women who never smoked, women who smoked prior to conception (AOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.04–1.66) or during their last trimester (AOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.56–2.52) were more likely to give birth to LBW infants. Women who experienced any stressful life events were more likely to deliver a VLBW infant (OR= 1.73; 95% CI: 1.48–2.01).
Xaverius et al, 2012 [40] USA Cross -sectional 8,095 12-44 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1996-2006 NA Questionnaire, physical examination NHANES Behaviours/Access to healthcare Non-pregnant (NP-US) women were 45% less likely to have a normal BMI, 1.9 times more likely to drink any alcohol, 2.0 times more likely to binge drink, 1.9 times more likely to smoke, and 3.7 times more likely to have used illicit drugs, 1.7 times more likely to engage in moderate physical activity and over 1.7 times more likely to use birth control than FB-US women. Non-pregnant foreign born women (NP-FB) were less likely to have health insurance (40.3 versus 17.2%); reported lower food security (78.4 versus 86.4%); were less likely to own their home (48.2 versus 62.4%); and were more likely to be impoverished (29.7 versus 17.4%).
Xaverius et al, 2009 [3] USA Cross -sectional Women at high-risk (16,113) or low-risk (39,426) for pregnancy 18-44 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2002-2004 NA Telephone survey Behaviours/ Health status/Access to healthcare Women at high-risk for pregnancy were 1.23 times more likely to be obese ([CI], 1.12–1.34) and 1.2 times more likely to smoke (CI, 1.11–1.31). They were 27% less likely to exercise (CI, 0.67–0.79), 62% less likely to receive a Pap test (CI, 0.31–0.46), 19% less likely to have HIV testing (CI, 0.75–0.87), and 44% less likely to have received sexually transmitted diseases counselling (CI, 0.50–0.63) compared to low-risk women. High-risk women were 27% less likely to use any alcohol (CI, 0.67–0.79) and 11% less likely to binge drink (CI, 0.80–0.99) compared with women at low-risk for an unintended pregnancy. 29% of women at risk for an unintended pregnancy are not using any contraceptive method.

KNOWLEDGE REGARDING PRECONCEPTION HEALTH

Forty three percent of the articles reported women’s knowledge and 10.4% awareness on preconception health.

Most studies targeted knowledge on folic acid, dietary habits and lifestyle behaviors. High awareness and knowledge on the importance of a healthy lifestyle were reported, including healthy food, normal Body Mass Index (BMI), exercise, sleeping habits, avoiding alcohol, smoking and drugs, and mental and emotional health [7, 20-26]. There was less awareness on risks deriving from the consumption of raw foods (54%), exposure to animals such as cats (64.4%), impact of genetic history and use of condoms [7]. Meanwhile a lower level of knowledge regarding folic acid and the birth defect it helps prevent (61.9%) was reported in some studies [7, 27, 28].

Important part of the knowledge regarding preconception health concerned knowing to seek medical care for chronic conditions, and review of medication in the preconception period [23, 29, 30]. However, Italian women of childbearing age affected by autoimmune diseases reported several unmet needs in their knowledge about reproductive issues [31].

The majority of women in the study by Lammers et al. believed that preconception healthcare has a positive impact in their health, but still less than half (44.2 %) were somewhat or very interested in receiving preconception healthcare [32].

Knowledge regarding taking some medical exams (such as HIV test), infectious diseases, sexually transmittedinfections and immunization were also reported to play a crucial role in preconception health [7, 22, 23, 25].

For a better preconception health, of utmost importance is the information on preconception counselling, how to apply for it, when to ask for one and the health providers that may give the information [30, 33, 34].

While it was acknowledged that the best time to receive information about preconception health is before conception [7, 23], some women reported that seeking preconception care was not relevant to them if they were not planning a pregnancy [18].

BEHAVIORS AND ATTITUDES REGARDING PRECONCEPTION HEALTH

More than 70% of studies discussed behaviors and attitudes in women of childbearing age, most of which focusing on physical activity (37%), tobacco avoidance (33%), folic acid assumption and diet (33%).

Following the recommended levels of physical activity is associated to healthy diet and weight [12, 35]. As for diabetes mellitus, while some studies have found a statistically significant association (OR 0,79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96) with physical activity [36], others have failed to do so [12]. The percentage of women that met the recommended amount of weekly physical activity went from 26% [36] to 72% [34].

Comparing women with low vs high probability for unintended pregnancy, the latter were 35% less likely to exercise [3]. Neighborhood composition and implementation of targeted interventions also influenced the level of physical activity [24] [37]. The importance of physical activity was also acknowledged by other studies [24, 25, 38-40].

Among the modifiable behaviors during the preconception period, the intake of substances and alcohol is of utmost importance. Despite the negative effects, women report alcohol consumption in the three months preceding pregnancy [10, 41], smoking during the first few months of pregnancy and in the last three months of pregnancy [41] and in the preconception period [10, 38, 42], as well as drug use [38]. The latter was reported by up to 8% of women in the month before pregnancy [43] and 25.1% during preconception [44]. Higher rates of these at-risk behaviors are seen in women in general, out of the preconception period [9, 22] and are associated with lack of screening services and general health counseling [24], migration status [45], racial and ethnic disparities [46]. In addition, the value system and the perception of happiness symbols may influence women’s health behaviors at different stages of their reproductive life [39]. Other studies have assessed behaviors of women during preconception period, reporting also the effect of educational interventions or the role of general practitioners and midwifes on changing negative behaviors into positive ones [3, 23, 47].

The intention to have a pregnancy impact on preconception health. In fact, Nowicki et al report that 57.7% of women with an unplanned pregnancy, realized several weeks after conception that they were pregnant. Among these women 28.8% were smoking and 21.7% did not have any health insurance. In addition, those who reported unexpected pregnancies were victims of abuse and physical violence (10 and 7.36%, respectively) [39].

Folic acid consumption plays a crucial role in the preconception health. Despite the relevance of the topic, folic acid intake is low among women in childbearing age [10, 11, 28, 29, 38, 47]. The low levels of folic acid are due to the inappropriate eating habits, which automatically cause an inadequate supply of folic acid and lack of supplement intake [27].

Women who do not plan a pregnancy are less likely to take folic acid [38]. The use of folic acid in the preconception period is often associated with older age, a high level of education [10] and migration status [48]. The importance of folic acid consumption for preconception health was also highlighted in other studies [3, 24, 32].

As for a healthy lifestyle and diet, it is necessary to remember that the attention to the latter should not be underestimated even if a woman is not planning a pregnancy [12, 23, 24, 35, 39, 61]. The studies’ results support general dietary recommendations for women of reproductive age to consume a diet rich in vegetables, whole grains, nuts, fish, low in red meats and snacks. ‘Meats, snacks and sweets’ diet pattern has been associated with significantly higher Gestational Diabetes Mellitus risk, while the ‘Mediterranean-style’ pattern with lower GDM risk [12]. Reporting any exercise or fruit/vegetable consumption was associated with decreased odds of overweight or obesity [35].

However, women of childbearing age often do not reach the recommended minimum levels of consumption of cereals, vegetables, and proteins [27, 38]. High prevalence of inadequate dietary micronutrient intake was observed for calcium (47.9%), folate (80.8%), magnesium (52.5%), potassium (63.8%) and vitamin E (78.6%) [49]. Worse dietary intakes were associated with younger age, lower education level, lower annual household income, not planning a pregnancy, obesity/overweight and smoking [42].

Among behaviors that are important for a good preconception health there were also birth control use [22-24, 32, 50-52], avoidance of exposure to toxic chemicals [24] and appropriate sleep [39].

WOMEN’S HEALTH STATUS

Studies assessing the health status of women of childbearing age reported information on BMI (23%), mental health (10.4%), chronic and infectious diseases (14.6%) immunization (6.3%) and control of prescription drugs (6.3%).

Weight and a normal BMI play an important role in preconception health and have been associated with eating habits and physical activity [3, 10, 22, 24, 32, 38, 39, 42]. A diet composed of meats, snacks and sweets has been associated with significantly higher Gestational Diabetes Mellitus risk in parous and obese women, and in women with lower educational qualifications [12, 36, 49]. Evaluating ethnic disparities in body weight, a study in USA [46] found a higher BMI among black women (38.1%).

Mental health has an imperative role in the wellbeing of women in the preconception period [24, 39]. Women who experience any preconception stressful life events are more likely to give birth to very low birth weight infants [41]. The studies by Dunlop et al. and Denny et al. emphasize the importance of ethnicity and race on preconception mental health [23, 46].

Among the conditions to be controlled in the preconception period, there are anemia, STIs (sexually transmitted infections) pressure, diabetes [32]. However, only a small proportion of women have discussed about these conditions with their doctor [23, 32]. These women take one or more medications for their chronic conditions, often without any contraception management [52] and sometimes have low level of knowledge regarding the topic [31]. Immunization is another important variable for the health status of women in preconception period [22, 32]. Oral health in preconception care is certainly not to be underestimated. Better oral health outcomes have been reported by young women who have never had a pregnancy [53].

ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH SERVICES IN PRECONCEPTION PERIOD

Women report the need to speak with their reference doctors about preconception health [8]. However, many doctors report that their patients are more likely to deal with the topic of contraceptive techniques, leaving out aspects more related to preconception health itself [30, 54]. Preconception healthcare conversation has been associated with race, health care provider type, number of visits to a health care provider, pregnancy planning [32] and educational interventions [34]. Generally, patients would prefer to receive information on preconception health from their general practitioner, but only a few of them remember having ever discussed it during a visit [7].

Women who do not plan pregnancies have a higher probability of not receiving routine physical exams, screening services and health advice [10, 9, 24].

These services include receiving a PAP test and HIV testing [3, 22, 24]. Studies in USA highlight that having health insurance during the pre-pregnancy period is associated with greater health [19, 40, 55, 56] and with variables such as ethnicity, socio-economic conditions [56].

INTERVENTIONS TO ADDRESS PRECONCEPTION HEALTH NEEDS

An intervention to address preconception health needs was reported in 37.5% of studies, and in most cases (44.4%), it was an educational one. Educational intervention increased knowledge about the benefits of folic acid [28, 29] and awareness of factors affecting preconception health, such as tobacco, alcohol, excessive weight [8, 26].

Educational intervention improved the use of prenatal vitamins (folic acid) [24, 29, 30], preconception counselling [57], addressing chronic conditions and discussing medications with a provider [23, 30], screening for sexually transmitted infections [23] use of contraception [30], diet, physical activity [24]. However, increased knowledge on folic acid and its role or contraception, was not always associated with changes in behaviors [28, 57].

Educational interventions on young population increased knowledge regarding overall preconception health and obesity, but not concerning alcohol, smoking, diabetes, or use of condoms [21] and did not demonstrate a statistically significant change in the self-reported preconception health behavior index [58].

Expanded Medicaid eligibility was associated with increased healthcare coverage and utilization, better self-rated health, and decreases in avoidance of care [19].

Use of a Web-based virtual animated health counsellor or a Risk Assessment (RA) digital tool, had an impact on participants’ behaviors (18-34) [59] and increased the identification of risk factors [25]. Sending written invitations to women increased the participation of women in preconception counselling [33] and the number of women applying for a preconception consultation [34].

Individual visits by a general practitioner or a midwife increased folic acid intake, decreased the frequency of binge drinking, but had no impact on smoking [47] and increased family planning service offered to women of childbearing age [51].

Finally, a training targeting healthcare professionals increased the rates of clinicians counseling women about contraception and recommending a long-acting reversible contraceptive [54].

Discussion

Preconception health includes a wide spectrum of health dimensions and cannot be comprehended without a holistic and multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this review was to comprehensively summarize the health needs of women of childbearing age, necessary to be addressed in order to have an eventual healthy pregnancy, for the woman and her child (summarized in Tab. I).

Tab. I.

Recommendations for healthcare professionals on preconception health.

Knowledge
  • Provide adequate information on risk factors during preconception period that could have a negative impact on the pregnancy and the unborn child

  • Best time for the women to receive information on preconception health

  • Who would most benefit from is preconception counselling

  • Information on multivitamin use including folic acid and NTD (neural tube defects)

  • Information on a healthy lifestyle including smoking, alcohol use, diet and physical activity

  • Information on family planning and contraception methods

  • Information on chronic diseases and medication use

  • Provide educational interventions to increase knowledge and awareness

Behaviors
  • Promote adequate levels of physical activity

  • Promote a healthy diet

  • Promote adequate amounts of folic acid

  • Advice avoiding alcohol, tobacco and drugs use

  • Promote an appropriate number of hours of sleep, based on age and daily activities

  • Avoiding exposure to toxic chemicals

  • Provide guidance and prevention on environmental hazards

  • Advice adequate use of contraceptive techniques or fertility regulation methods

  • Promote thinking about the value of pregnancy: the perception of happiness symbols may influence women’s health behavior at different stages of their reproductive life

  • Define the probability of having a pregnancy: women who have unplanned pregnancies realize their condition late and are more likely to have unhealthy behaviors, such as smoke, alcohol and drugs in the preconception period as well as after conception

Women’s health status
  • Control the weight and BMI

  • Control for chronic, genetic and infectious diseases

  • Check for sexually transmitted diseases

  • Control of prescription drugs

  • Assessment of mental health issues

  • Check the immunization status

Accessibility to health services
  • Provide preconception health counselling to all women in childbearing age

  • Provide routine physical exams, screening services (ex. i.e. PAP test) and health advices

  • Provide a sexually transmitted disease counselling

  • Check the health coverage condition (where applicable)

  • Provide interventions to increase women’s participation in preconception counselling

Based on the similarities among studies, health needs were divided into four categories, including knowledge and awareness on preconception health, behaviors and attitudes regarding preconception health, women’s health status and access to healthcare services. Among the most examined topics by the studies included in the review there were knowledge and awareness on preconception health, folic acid assumption, tobacco and alcohol consumption, physical activity, healthy diet and body weight.

Some studies reported a satisfactory level of knowledge and awareness concerning preconception health. Women recognized the importance of taking care of their health in anticipation of a possible pregnancy [7, 20-22, 33, 58, 59]. Knowledge was higher regarding topics like adopting a healthy lifestyle, including healthy diet, exercise, sleeping habits, and avoiding alcohol and smoking. Less was known regarding the consumption of folic acid, consumption of raw foods and impact of genetics (84.1%) [7, 25, 31, 61]. Studies concluded that educational interventions are effective in increasing knowledge on preconception health, so future interventions, especially on topics in which women have less knowledge should be implemented [18, 21-24, 26, 28-30, 57, 58]. The level of knowledge in the population is linked to the relationship with health professionals who are the main providers of health-related information. However, even though studies report a high level of knowledge and awareness and an impact of educational interventions on that, the knowledge alone or the recommendations provided by a healthcare professional are not always sufficient to change behaviors [28, 58]. Nonetheless, the positive impact of educational interventions on women’s attitudes and behaviors, especially those related to nutrition and physical activity was seen in the study by Hillemeier et al. [24]. Beyond the primary role of the health professionals, public health is involved in promoting preconception care. Various strategies can be applied to this purpose, for example, schools and public health campaigns were identified by women themselves as methods for achieving greater awareness, or, similarly to the screening prevention campaigns, the use of invitation letters from the municipalities and general practitioners [18, 34]. Future longitudinal studies should focus on assessing the type of interventions that could have an impact not only on knowledge and awareness, but also on women’s behaviors concerning preconception health. These interventions should be tailored to women’s characteristics considering social, psychological and environmental factors that shape preconception health. A crucial role in this regard is played by health promotion which should start from early in life with a particular reinforcement in adolescence.

Amid the included articles, the most studied behaviors among women of childbearing age were physical activity, tobacco avoidance and folic acid assumption. Studies acknowledged the importance of physical activity on preconception health but reported that not always women met the recommended amount of physical exercise [35, 37]. Women who have a higher probability for unintended pregnancy exercise less and neighborhood composition may play a role on preconception physical activity status. The use of alcohol and tobacco in the preconception period was not uncommon, even though their negative consequences are well known. Women who binge drink in the preconception period are, also, more likely to smoke and be exposed to violence during this period, as well as to consume alcohol, binge drink, and smoke during pregnancy. Along with these risk factors, the consumption of marijuana is another underestimated issue that is strictly connected with the previous ones [43], but with deeper social differences: compared with tobacco users, pre-pregnancy marijuana users were more likely to have low education, low income and mental health disorders [44]. In addition, the increasing use of medical cannabis, particularly in USA, should be considered as an issue of preconception health, even if there is a gap in knowledge in the examined literature. Racial and ethnic disparities in behaviors concerning preconception health were seen in several studies [40, 46]. Women who have unintended pregnancies are more likely to engage in risky health behaviors. According to Srinivasulu et al, interventions should act in this regard also by offering family planning services [51]. Meanwhile, positive behaviors in preconception period are associated with receiving screening services and general health counselling.

As it is widely reported, the consumption of folic acid during preconception period is of utmost importance to prevent neural tubal defects [60]. However, the percentage of women who were taking folic acid in the included studies ranged from 5% [29] to 48.9% [38]. Folic acid intake is affected by pregnancy planning and is often associated with older maternal age and a high level of education. Younger women have often worse eating habits, which automatically cause an inadequate supply of folic acid [42]. Also, immigration status was negatively correlated with folic acid consumption, that, however, increased as the time of residence was lengthened, showing the importance of socio-cultural environment in changing this behavior [48]. Fortunately, simple educational intervention in preconception care can contributes to initiation of folic acid supplementation, because it is a well-accepted habit, compared to the cessation of smoking that is hard to obtain [47]. Positive health behaviors for a good preconception health include, also, birth control use [22-24, 32, 40], avoidance of exposure to toxic chemicals or teratogenic medication without proper concomitant contraception [24, 52] and appropriate sleep [39]. The existence of several risky behaviors among women of childbearing age calls for a better health promotion and public health interventions.

For a pregnancy to be healthy and at low risk for both the woman and her child there is the need for the woman to be in an optimal health status before conceiving. In this context, a normal BMI, a good mental health, chronic and infectious diseases control, immunization and control of prescription drugs were the most important aspects that emerged from the studies included in the review. Women who went through stressful events during the preconception period were more likely to have low birth weight infants [41]. This highlights that a good mental health is imperative for a healthy pregnancy. Racial and ethnic disparities were, also, important for mental health. A comprehensive assessment of a woman’s health status should also include checking for anemia, STI, blood pressure, diabetes and oral health.

In order to have the right knowledge, attitude, behavior and health status women need to have access to healthcare services. Women report the necessity to speak to their reference doctors about preconception health [8, 31]. Still, many doctors state that women are more interested in discussing about contraception techniques than about preconception health in general [54]. Since most women would prefer receiving information from their doctor, the latter should not fail to discuss preconception health during consults and involve their patients in programs that provide information on this topic. Doctors should encourage women to receive the basic examinations related to preconception health like a PAP test, HIV testing and Sexually transmitted Disease Counseling. Health insurance was also deemed to be important for women’s access to healthcare services. Most of the studies analyzed were actually conducted in the USA, where insurance coverage is needed to access treatment, thereby causing more ethnical and social disparities, as the preconception care is the first to be sacrificed in difficult socio-economic situations [56].

As discussed, preconception health is a wide concept, including several aspects that need a multidisciplinary approach. Integrating preconception health promotion into the continuum of women’s healthcare asks for multi-dimensional and multistrategic programs involving a range of health professional expertise.

It is important that women of childbearing age have the adequate level of knowledge, adopt the right behaviors and attitudes, and have access to healthcare services in order to start a pregnancy, even when unintended, in good health. As the critical period for fetal development may extend to the preconception period, a proper management of women’s health should start well before conception.

Policy makers and healthcare professionals should not fail to address all women’s preconception health in a holistic and multidisciplinary way, which may ultimately improve the long-term health of women and their children.

IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH

Preconception health care has the potential for substantial public health benefit. For this, it is important to have a holistic view of healthcare needs of women of childbearing age. This review could assist healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, midwives) in guiding tailored counselling to provide the adequate level of preconception care to women. It could also act as a reference to policy makers in developing guidelines or policies.

This article represents the first step of a multistage project. It will be followed by the creation and validation of a questionnaire, based on the results of this review, to comprehensively assess the preconception health needs of women of childbearing age and evaluate at what level they are met in the Italian context.

Acknowledgements

None.

Figures and tables

Footnotes

Ethical approvals

This systematic review has been registered in Prospero protocol; the approval of Ethical Committee was not necessary.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest in the study design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC) grant [Linea D.3.2 2019] “Vivere, vivibilità, resilienza, educazione per contrastare la povertà”.

Authors’ contributions

All Authors contributed in equal measure.

References

  • [1].Stephenson J, Heslehurst N, Hall J, Schoenaker DAJM, Hutchinson J, Cade JE, Poston L, Barrett G, Crozier SR, Barker M, Kumaran K, Yajnik CS, Baird J, Mishra GD. Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet 2018;391:1830-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30311-8 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30311-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Moos MK, Dunlop AL, Jack BW, Nelson L, Coonrod DV, Long R, Boggess K, Gardiner PM. Healthier women, healthier reproductive outcomes: recommendations for the routine care of all women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(Suppl. 2):S280-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.060 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Xaverius PK, Tenkku LE, Salas J. Differences between women at higher and lower risk for an unintended pregnancy. Womens Health Issues 2009;19:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.06.002 10.1016/j.whi.2009.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Frey KA, Navarro SM, Kotelchuck M, Lu MC. The clinical content of preconception care: preconception care for men. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(Suppl. 2):S389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.024 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Hillemeier MM, Downs DS, Feinberg ME, Weisman CS, Chuang CH, Parrott R, Velott D, Francis LA, Baker SA, Dyer AM, Chinchilli VM. Improving women’s preconceptional health: findings from a randomized trial of the Strong Healthy Women intervention in the Central Pennsylvania women’s health study. Womens Health Issues 2008;18(Suppl. 6):S87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.008 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Delgado C. Pregnancy 101: a call for reproductive and prenatal health education in college. Matern Child Health J 2013;17:240-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-0967-1 10.1007/s10995-012-0967-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Frey KA, Files JA. Preconception healthcare: what women know and believe. Matern Child Health J 2006;10(Suppl. 5):S73-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0110-2 10.1007/s10995-006-0110-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Bello JK, Adkins K, Stulberg DB, Rao G. Perceptions of a reproductive health self-assessment tool (RH-SAT) in an urban community health center. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:655-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.004 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Naimi TS, Lipscomb LE, Brewer RD, Gilbert BC. Binge drinking in the preconception period and the risk of unintended pregnancy: implications for women and their children. Pediatrics 2003;111(5 Pt 2):1136-41. PMID: 12728126 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Nilsen RM, Leoncini E, Gastaldi P, Allegri V, Agostino R, Faravelli F, Ferrazzoli F, Finale E, Ghirri P, Scarano G, Mastroiacovo P. Prevalence and determinants of preconception folic acid use: an Italian multicenter survey. Ital J Pediatr 2016;42:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-016-0278-z 10.1186/s13052-016-0278-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Głąbska D, Książek A, Guzek D. Development and validation of the brief folate-specific food frequency questionnaire for young women’s diet assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121574 10.3390/ijerph14121574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Schoenaker DA, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Callaway LK, Mishra GD. Pre-pregnancy dietary patterns and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: results from an Australian population-based prospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2015;58:2726-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3742-1 10.1007/s00125-015-3742-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 10.1136/bmj.i4919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. INSERT ALLA AUTHORS The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed on 24 september 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Herzog R, Álvarez-Pasquin MJ, Díaz C, Del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil Á. Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013;13:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-154 10.1186/1471-2458-13-154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Walker R, Kandel P, Hill B, Hills S, Dunbar J, Skouteris H. Practice nurses and providing preconception care to women in Australia: a qualitative study. Aust J Prim Health 2021;27:13-21. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY20072 10.1071/PY20072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Ekstrand Ragnar M, Grandahl M, Stern J, Mattebo M. Important but far away: adolescents’ beliefs, awareness and experiences of fertility and preconception health. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2018;23:265-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1481942 10.1080/13625187.2018.1481942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Richards J, Mousseau A. Community-based participatory research to improve preconception health among Northern Plains American Indian adolescent women. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res 2012;19:154-85. https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.1901.2012.154 10.5820/aian.1901.2012.154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Harelick L, Viola D, Tahara D. Preconception health of low socioeconomic status women: assessing knowledge and behaviors. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:272-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.03.006 10.1016/j.whi.2011.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Dunlop AL, Dretler AW, Badal HJ, Logue KM. Acceptability and potential impact of brief preconception health risk assessment and counseling in the WIC setting. Am J Health Promot 2013;27(Suppl. 3):S58-65. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.120109-QUAL-7. 10.4278/ajhp.120109-QUAL-7 PMID: 23286665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Hillemeier MM, Weisman CS, Chase GA, Dyer AM, Shaffer ML. Women’s preconceptional health and use of health services: implications for preconception care. Health Serv Res 2008;43(1 Pt 1):54-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00741.x 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00741.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Montanaro C, Lacey L, Robson L, Estill A, Vukovic S. Preconception care: a technology-based model for delivery in the primary care setting supported by public health. Matern Child Health J 2019;23:1581-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02806-4 10.1007/s10995-019-02806-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Skogsdal Y, Fadl H, Cao Y, Karlsson J, Tydén T. An intervention in contraceptive counseling increased the knowledge about fertility and awareness of preconception health-a randomized controlled trial. Ups J Med Sci 2019;124:203-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2019.1653407 10.1080/03009734.2019.1653407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hilton JJ. Folic acid intake of young women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31:172-7. PMID: 11926400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Quillin JM, Silberg J, Board P, Pratt L, Bodurtha J. College women’s awareness and consumption of folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects. Genet Med 2000;2:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200007000-00002 10.1097/00125817-200007000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Flores AL, Isenburg J, Hillard CL, deRosset L, Colen L, Bush T, Mai CT. Folic acid education for hispanic women: the promotora de salud model. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:186-94. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6116 10.1089/jwh.2016.6116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Kvach E, Marcus H, Loomis L. Evaluation of resident and faculty performance in routinely addressing unmet reproductive health needs in a Teaching Health Center. Fam Med 2018;50:291-5. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2018.177339 10.22454/FamMed.2018.177339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Andreoli L, Lazzaroni MG, Carini C, Dall’Ara F, Nalli C, Reggia R, Rodrigues M, Benigno C, Baldissera E, Bartoloni-Bocci E, Basta F, Bellisai F, Bortoluzzi A, Campochiaro C, Cantatore FP, Caporali R, Ceribelli A, Chighizola CB, Conigliaro P, Tincani A. “Disease knowledge index” and perspectives on reproductive issues: a nationwide study on 398 women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Joint Bone Spine 2019;86:475-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.12.002 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Lammers CR, Hulme PA, Wey H, Kerkvliet J, Arunachalam SP. Understanding Women’s awareness and access to preconception health care in a rural population: a cross sectional study. J Community Health 2017;42:489-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0281-8 10.1007/s10900-016-0281-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Murugesu L, Hopman ME, Van Voorst SF, Rosman AN, Fransen MP. Systematic development of materials for inviting low health-literate individuals to participate in preconception counseling. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:4223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214223 10.3390/ijerph16214223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Sijpkens MK, van Voorst SF, de Jong-Potjer LC, Denktaş S, Verhoeff AP, Bertens LCM, Rosman AN, Steegers E. The effect of a preconception care outreach strategy: the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3882-y 10.1186/s12913-019-3882-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Bello JK, Stulberg DB, Zhou Y, Wang C. Physical activity and consumption patterns of reproductive-aged women by BMI Category. Matern Child Health J 2018;22:713-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2440-2 10.1007/s10995-018-2440-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Whitaker KM, Ingram KH, Appiah D, Nicholson WK, Bennett WL, Lewis CE, Reis JP, Schreiner PJ, Gunderson EP. Prepregnancy fitness and risk of gestational diabetes: a longitudinal analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018;50:1613-9. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001600 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Vamos CA, Sun H, Flory SB, DeBate R, Daley EM, Thompson E, Bleck J, Merrell L. Community level predictors of physical activity among women in the preconception period. Matern Child Health J 2015;19:1584-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1668-3 10.1007/s10995-015-1668-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Cuervo M, Sayon-Orea C, Santiago S, Martínez JA. Dietary and health profiles of Spanish women in preconception, pregnancy and lactation. Nutrients 2014;6:4434-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6104434 10.3390/nu6104434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Nowicki GJ, Misztal-Okońska P, Ślusarska B, Rudnicka-Drożak E, Młynarska M, Czekierdowski A. Analysis of health behaviors and personal values of childless women, pregnant women and women who recently delivered. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030411 10.3390/ijerph15030411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Xaverius PK, Salas J, Tenkku LE. Preconception wellness: differences in health by immigrant status. J Immigr Minor Health 2012;14:216-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-010-9424-7 10.1007/s10903-010-9424-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Witt WP, Mandell KC, Wisk LE, Cheng ER, Chatterjee D, Wakeel F, Park H, Zarac D. Infant birthweight in the US: the role of preconception stressful life events and substance use. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:529-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0595-z 10.1007/s00737-015-0595-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Carmichael SL, Ma C, Feldkamp ML, Shaw GM; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Comparing usual dietary intakes among subgroups of mothers in the year before pregnancy. Public Health Rep 2019;134:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918821078 10.1177/0033354918821078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Short VL, Hand DJ, Gannon M, Abatemarco DJ. Maternal characteristics associated with preconception marijuana use. Am J Prev Med 2020;59:555-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.010 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Bromwich KA, Sokol NA, McCallum M, Nguyen C, Werner EF, Matteson KA, Vergara-Lopez C, Stroud LR. Preconception marijuana use in rhode island: rates, demographics, and psychosocial correlates. R I Med J (2013) 2020;103:37-41. PMID: 32357592; PMCID: PMC7275872 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Xaverius PK, Salas J. Surveillance of preconception health indicators in behavioral risk factor surveillance system: emerging trends in the 21st century. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013;22:203-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3804 10.1089/jwh.2012.3804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Denny CH, Floyd RL, Green PP, Hayes DK. Racial and ethnic disparities in preconception risk factors and preconception care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012;21:720-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2011.3259 10.1089/jwh.2011.3259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Sijpkens MK, van Voorst SF, Rosman AN, de Jong-Potjer LC, Denktaş S, Koch BCP, Bertens LCM, Steegers EAP. Change in lifestyle behaviors after preconception care: a prospective cohort study. Am J Health Promot 2021;35:116-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120927287 10.1177/0890117120927287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Nilsen RM, Daltveit AK, Iversen MM, Sandberg MG, Schytt E, Small R, Strandberg RB, Vick ES, Aasheim Z. Preconception folic acid supplement use in immigrant women (1999-2016). Nutrients 2019;11:2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102300 10.3390/nu11102300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Looman M, Schoenaker DAJM, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Mishra GD, Geelen A, Feskens EJM. Pre-pregnancy dietary micronutrient adequacy is associated with lower risk of developing gestational diabetes in Australian women. Nutr Res 2019;62:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2018.11.006 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Xaverius PK, Salas J, Kiel D. Differences in pregnancy planning between women aged 18-44, with and without diabetes: behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013;99:63-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.029 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Srinivasulu S, Shah SD, Schechter CB, Prine L, Rubin SE. Effectiveness of clinical decision support to enhance delivery of family planning services in primary care settings. Contraception 2020;101:199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.002 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Panchal BD, Cash R, Moreno C, Vrontos E, Bourne C, Palmer S, Simpson A, Panchal AR. High-risk medication prescriptions in primary care for women without documented contraception. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:474-80. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180281 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Azofeifa A, Yeung LF, Alverson CJ, Beltrán-Aguilar E. Oral health conditions and dental visits among pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:E163. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140212 10.5888/pcd11.140212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Stulberg DB, Dahlquist IH, Disterhoft J, Bello JK, Hunter MS. Increase in contraceptive counseling by primary care clinicians after implementation of one key question® at an Urban Community Health Center. Matern Child Health J 2019;23:996-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02754-z 10.1007/s10995-019-02754-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Hawks RM, McGinn AP, Bernstein PS, Tobin JN. Exploring preconception care: insurance status, race/ethnicity, and health in the pre-pregnancy period. Matern Child Health J 2018;22:1103-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2494-1 10.1007/s10995-018-2494-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Daw JR, Kolenic GE, Dalton VK, Zivin K, Winkelman T, Kozhimannil KB, Admon LK. Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal insurance coverage. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:917-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003728 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Batra P, Mangione CM, Cheng E, Steers WN, Nguyen TA, Bell D, Kuo AA, Gregory KD. A cluster randomized controlled trial of the myfamilyplan online preconception health education tool. Am J Health Promot 2018;32:897-905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117700585 10.1177/0890117117700585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].DeJoy SB. Pilot Test of a preconception and midwifery care promotion program for college women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014;59:523-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12106 10.1111/jmwh.12106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Bickmore T, Zhang Z, Reichert M, Julce C, Jack B. Promotion of preconception care among adolescents and young adults by conversational agent. J Adolesc Health 2020;67(2S):S45-S51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.006 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Timmermans S, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Steegers EA. Periconception folic acid supplementation, fetal growth and the risks of low birth weight and preterm birth: the Generation R Study. Br J Nutr 2009;102:777-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509288994. 10.1017/S0007114509288994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Głąbska D, Książek A, Guzek D. Development and validation of the brief folate-specific food frequency questionnaire for young women’s diet assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121574 10.3390/ijerph14121574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Margerison CE, MacCallum CL, Chen J, Zamani-Hank Y, Kaestner R. Impacts of medicaid expansion on health among women of reproductive age. Am J Prev Med 2020;58:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.019 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES