Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2020 Jul 10;32(10):1498–1509. doi: 10.1177/0898264320939006

Table 2.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Life Summary Scores: Hierarchical Linear Model Results.

Unadjusted
Resident Covariates
Resident and Facility Covariates
b se b se b se
Key explanatory variables
 Group (reference = white, low-minority facility)
  White, high-minority facility   −4.077*** 1.013   −4.172***   .85   −2.282**   .779
  Minority, low-minority facility   −2.624* 1.323   −2.409 1.323   −2.105 1.300
  Minority, high-minority facility   −5.420*** 1.294   −5.732*** 1.303   −4.033** 1.298
 Year (reference = 2011)
  2012  −.296   .204  −.322   .199  −.308   .204
  2013    .293   .226    .266   .223    .314   .225
  2014    .022   .246  −.549*   .247  −.426   .244
  2015  −.311   .257  −.593*   .251  −.480   .252
 Group–year interactions
  White, high-minority facility # 2012  −.558   .760  −.552   .732  −.435   .745
  White, high-minority facility # 2013   −1.436   .765   −1.147   .668   −1.150   .663
  White, high-minority facility # 2014   −1.534   .877   −1.338   .856   −1.481   .855
  White, high-minority facility # 2015  −.758   .963   −1.129   .905   −1.006   .849
  Minority, low-minority facility # 2012   −1.795 1.977   −2.004 1.901   −1.804 1.886
  Minority, low-minority facility # 2013   −1.081 1.944  −.606 1.911  −.568 1.885
  Minority, low-minority facility # 2014  −.741 1.718  −.596 1.757  −.455 1.732
  Minority, low-minority facility # 2015   −1.954 1.654   −2.050 1.667   −1.741 1.640
  Minority, high-minority facility # 2012    .353 1.466    .350 1.460    .353 1.449
  Minority, high-minority facility # 2013   −1.553 1.383   −1.390 1.377   −1.376 1.420
  Minority, high-minority facility # 2014   −1.292 1.500   −1.270 1.444   −1.418 1.448
  Minority, high-minority facility # 2015   −1.602 1.421   −1.686 1.471   −1.455 1.390
Resident-level characteristics
 Age (years)    .057***   .010    .047***   .010
 Activities of daily living score long-form scale (0–28)  −.415***   .013  −.404***   .012
 Length of stay (years)    .309***   .034    .299***   .034
 Married    .173   .192    .111   .191
 Count of chronic conditions (0–5)  −.540***   .100    .527***   .099
 Depression diagnosis   −2.479***   .162   −2.470***   .161
 Anxiety diagnosis   −1.699***   .193   −1.710***   .194
 Moderate or severe cognitive impairment  1.840***   .198  1.790***   .197
 Dementia diagnosis  1.370***   .178  1.504***   .179
 Serious mental illness diagnosis   −1.355***   .286   −1.210***   .286
 Behavioral symptoms   −2.675***   .227   −2.748***   .222
Facility-level characteristics
 Location (reference = Twin Cities)
  Other metro  1.349***   .372
  Micropolitan  1.585***   .381
  Rural  2.514***   .377
 Ownership (reference = nonprofit)
  For profit   −1.359***   .361
  Government    .412   .433
 Chain affiliation  −.127   .273
 Minnesota acuity index   −1.676 1.542
 Number of beds, each 10  −.130***   .029
 Occupancy, each 10 percentage points    .575***   .153
 Proportion of Medicare resident days, each 10 percentage points    .162   .279
 Proportion of Medicaid resident days, each 10 percentage points  −.200   .131
 Staffing levels (hours per resident day)
  Registered nurse    .151   .474
  Licensed practical nurse    .518   .641
  Certified nursing assistant  −.159   .336
  Activities  4.040** 1.289
  Social service and mental health staff  3.622* 1.806
  High use of temporary staff  1.568*   .631
  All staff retention rate, each 10 percentage points    .389***   .099
 Random intercept variance   10.381  8.365  5.033
 Residual variance 231.829 219.203 219.203
 Intraclass correlation    .043    .037    .022
 Number of surveys  60,903  59,103  59,035
 Number of NFs    376    376    375

The table reports the coefficient estimates and standard errors from nested random intercept regression models where the dependent variable is a quality of life summary score. The key variables are indicators for whether the resident is a minority interacted with whether they reside in a high-minority facility. We also fitted GEE models with independence correlation structure, and it did not qualitatively change the results (not shown).

***

p < .01,

**

p < .05,

*

p < .10.