Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2022 May 2;67(10):10.1088/1361-6560/ac6725. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac6725

Table 3.

Similarity metrics for kVCT, and sMVCT (CycleGAN) versus MVCT.

kVCT sMVCT (CycleGAN)

MD soft tissue (HU) 11 ± 117 2 ± 104
MD bone (HU) 327 ± 269 3 ± 160
MAD soft tissue (HU) 66 ± 97 61 ± 85
MAD bone (HU) 340 +252 97 ± 123
RMSD soft tissue (HU) 118 105
RMSD bone (HU) 270 160
MD soft tissue (ρe) −0.013 ± 0.097 (1.3%) −0.0035 ± 0.098 (0.35%)
MD bone (ρe) 0.044 ± 0.148 (2.9%) 0.0020 ± 0.155 (0.13%)
MAD soft tissue (ρe) 0.060 ± 0.080 0.057 ± 0.081
MAD bone (ρe) 0.096 ± 0.124 0.095 ± 0.119
RMSD soft tissue (ρe) 0.16 0.10
RMSD bone (ρe) 0.35 0.13
MD soft tissue (SPR) 0.018 ± 0.106 (1.8%) 0.0024 ± 0.107 (0.24%)
MD bone (SPR) 0.103 ± 0.158 (6.8%) 0.0024 ± 0.166 (0.16%)
MAD soft tissue (SPR) 0.063 ± 0.086 0.062 ± 0.087
MAD bone (SPR) 0.129 ± 0.137 0.106 ± 0.128
RMSD soft tissue (SPR) 0.11 0.11
RMSD bone (SPR) 0.16 0.16
SNR vs MVCT SNR soft tissue (ratio) 9.1 0.95
SNR vs MVCT SNR bone (ratio) 11.1 0.95
SSIM 0.856 0.862
PSNR 25.8 29.8