Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;88(1):35. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3602

Table 3.

Participant feedback on the course; * optimal score 3 (<3 too short and >3 too long).


QUESTION AVERAGE RESPONSE FOR IN-PERSON TOT (N = 93) AVERAGE RESPONSE FOR VIRTUAL COURSE (N = 28) DIFFERENCE

Overall, did the BEC ToT course meet your expectations? 4.6 4.3 0.3 p = 0.055

Overall, how would you rate the BEC ToT course? n/a 4.2 n/a

Did the BEC ToT course help you to better understand the BEC curriculum and content? 4.7 4.5 0.2 p = 0.06

Do you think the BEC ToT course improved your teaching skills? 4.3 4.0 0.3 p = 0.11

How effective were the instructors as a whole? 4.6 4.4 0.2 p = 0.13

How do you feel about the BEC ToT course length? 3.7 3.2* 0.5 p < 0.05

How do you feel about the technical aspects/logistics of the virtual BEC ToT course? 4.3 4.3 0.0 p = 0.69