Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;50(9):e51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac030

Table 2.

Top 10 most significant triplets identified by unsupervised MethReg analysis of TCGA COADREAD samples

Triplet data Annotations DNAm group × TF activity TF–target associations Tumor versus normal comparison P-values Literature support
Probe ID Position TF Target gene CpG–target distance TF.role DNAm.effect Estimate P-value Adj. P-value Correlation P-value CpG TF Target gene TF Target gene
Promoter analysis
cg00328227 chr1: 108661703 NFATC2 HENMT1 −176 Repressor Enhancing −0.663 0 0 −0.033 5.27E−01 3.19E−08 2.53E−01 8.23E−08 (48–49,51) (52,53)
cg25083481 chr11: 1034989 SNAI1 MUC6 1727 Activator Attenuating −0.413 1.77E−04 0 0.117 2.52E−02 8.98E−03 4.99E−10 1.97E−02 (64,66–67) (86)
cg02816729 chr6: 168442419 TEAD3 SMOC2 1267 Repressor Attenuating 0.323 7.77E−05 0 0.07 1.83E−01 2.96E−02 3.47E−02 7.32E−01 (54) (56,87)
cg12751565 chr1: 206946642 NFATC2 PIGR −175 Activator Enhancing 0.282 1.09E−09 0 0.315 8.67E−10 6.49E−03 2.53E−01 1.88E−11 (48–49,51) (88)
cg05503887 chr11: 34620378 MEIS1 EHF −713 Activator Attenuating −0.268 7.24E−05 0 0.347 1.10E−11 6.17E−01 1.84E−08 1.16E−02 (68) (89)
cg13542964 chr4: 10457043 ETV4 ZNF518B 381 Activator Enhancing 0.217 2.08E−04 0 0.023 6.59E−01 1.31E−06 1.32E−14 1.77E−02 (70,74) (90)
Distal analysis
cg14043104 chr13: 74075149 ISL2 KLF12 −80 092 Activator Attenuating −0.222 1.03E−04 0 0.232 7.60E−06 3.89E−02 3.96E−02 1.20E−03 (69) (91)
cg09217215 chr11: 31808034 ZNF384 PAX6 9925 Repressor Enhancing −0.398 6.90E−07 1.48E−04 −0.028 5.94E−01 7.64E−03 2.15E−01 1.68E−02 (78,79) (92)
cg11871337 chrX: 56991382 FOXL1 SPIN3 4443 Activator Attenuating −0.294 2.18E−07 2.68E−04 0.183 4.32E−04 7.26E−01 9.95E−01 8.21E−07 (82,83) (93)
cg04665204 chr17: 81453398 POU3F4 BAHCC1 57 922 Dual Invert −0.37 6.80E−07 2.91E−04 0.083 1.12E−01 2.69E−05 1.47E−06 2.38E−02 (57,61) (52,63)

Triplet data included the CpGs located in promoter regions (<2 kb from TSS) or distal regions (>2 kb from TSS), its location (hg38 genome), the target genes and the TFs with binding sites within 250 bp of the CpGs. Annotations included the distance between CpG and target gene (CpG–target distance), MethReg predicted roles of the TF on the target gene and the effect of DNA methylation (DNAm) on the TF. TF activity (hereafter referred to as TF) was first estimated using the VIPER software. After removing effects of CNA and tumor purity estimate in gene expression data, the robust linear model target gene expression residual ∼ DNAm group + TF + TF × DNAm group was then fitted to data to obtain estimated TF × DNAm group effect (estimate) and its P-value; the stage-wise method was used to compute the overall FDR (adj. P-value) for the term DNAm.group × TF. TF–target association in all samples was estimated using a correlation coefficient. P-values for tumor versus normal comparisons were obtained by applying Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare DNAm levels, TF and target gene in tumor and normal samples separately.