Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;63(5):17. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.5.17

Table 1.

Patients’ Characteristics

Group ILM ERM P Value PVR P Value
n 12 13 19
Age at surgery 71.1 (61.7-80.7) 70.9 (62.6-83.3) 0.99 59.6 (15.5-82.4) 0.28
Sex 0.07 0.06
 Male 4 (33.3%) 9 (69.2%) 13 (68.4%)
 Female 8 (66.7%) 4 (30.8%) 6 (31.6%)
Lens
 Phakic 7 (58.3%) 9 (69.2%) 0.57 6 (31.6%) 0.14
 Pseudophakic/aphakic 5 (41.7 %) 4 (30.8%) 13 (68.4%)
Primary PPV 11 (91.7%) 13 (100.0%) 0.29 7 (36.8%) 0.003
 Hx of trauma 2 (10.5%)
 Hx of chronic RD 5 (26.3%)
Revision PPV 1 (8.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.29 12 (63.2%) 0.003
 Without oil 1 (8.3%) 2 (10.5%)
 With oil 10 (52.6%)
Staining agent 12 (100.0%) 13 (100.0%) 1.00 10 (52.6%) 0.005
PVR grading
 C1 1 (5.3%)
 C2 13 (68.4%)
 C3 5 (26.3%)

Age at surgery is shown as mean and minimum/maximum. The percentage of patients undergoing primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with a history (Hx) of trauma or long-standing chronic retinal detachment (RD) is reported. PVR patients undergoing revision PPV for retinal detachment despite initial surgical repair are subdivided into eyes that were filled with or without silicone oil prior to the procedure. The percentage of processes in which a staining agent (MembraneBlue-Dual, D.O.R.C. International, Zuidland, The Netherlands or Brillant Peel, Fluoron GmbH, Ulm, Germany) was used is indicated. Grading of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) was performed according to the updated Retina Society Classification (1991) (1). The P value was calculated using Mann-Whitney test for age and Chi-square test for sex, lens, blue dye, and primary and revision PPV.

PPV, pars plana vitrectomy; Hx, history; RD, retinal detachment; PVR, proliferative vitreoretinopathy.