Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;10(5):e35061. doi: 10.2196/35061

Table 1.

Context and outcome characteristics for pediatric studies.

Study characteristics Number of studies by publication Totala

Journal articles Conference abstracts
Subtotal, n 7 6 13
Principal study type, n (%)

Single cohort 3 (43) 4 (67) 7 (54)

Before-after 4 (57) 2 (33) 6 (46)
Setting, n (%)

Hospital wideb 0 (0) 2 (33) 2 (15)

Emergency department 4 (57) 1 (17) 5 (38)

Intensive care unit 2 (29) 0 (0) 2 (15)

Inpatient units 1 (14) 3 (50) 4 (31)
Number of participants, n (%)

≤100 1 (14) 2 (33) 3 (23)

101-10,000 1 (14) 2 (33) 3 (23)

10,001-100,000 2 (29) 1 (17) 3 (23)

>100,000 2 (29) 0 (0) 2 (15)

Unspecified 1 (14) 1 (17) 2 (15)
Funding, n (%)

Yes (noncommercial) 2 (29) 0 (0) 2 (15)

No 2 (29) 0 (0) 2 (15)

Unspecified 3 (43) 6 (100) 9 (69)
Outcomes, n (%)

Patient outcomes


Sepsis identification 5 (71) 4 (67) 9 (69)



Gold standard definitionc




Goldstein et al [12] 2 (29) 0 (0) 2 (15)




American Academy of Pediatrics Sepsis Collaborative tool [85] 1 (14) 0 (0) 1 (8)




Clinician discretion 3 (43) 2 (33) 5 (38)




Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes definition [86] 1 (14) 0 (0) 1 (8)




International Classification of Diseases codes 1 (14) 0 (0) 1 (8)




Not specified 1 (14) 2 (33) 3 (23)


Other 4 (57) 1 (17) 5 (38)

Sepsis treatment or management, n (%)


Timeliness of alert or intervention 3 (43) 1 (17) 4 (31)


Other 6 (86) 1 (17) 7 (54)

Usability, n (%)


Satisfaction 0 (0) 1 (17) 1 (8)

aThe percentages were calculated from the number of pediatric studies (n=13). As some studies reported multiple outcomes for each category, there were more than 13 outcomes in some categories, and therefore, the percentages add to more than 100%.

bIf the study setting was not explicitly stated, it was assumed to be hospital wide.

cSome studies have used multiple definitions of sepsis as part of their gold standard.